LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


View Poll Results: What's your favorite non-*nix OS?
Microsoft Windows (any version: NT, CE, 9x, Win16, etc.) 33 43.42%
Apple Mac OS 9 11.84%
IBM OS/2 (e.g., OS/2 Warp 4.x) 2 2.63%
BeOS 8 10.53%
DOS (MS-DOS, DR-DOS, FreeDOS, etc.) 11 14.47%
PalmOS 6 7.89%
IBM OS/360 0 0%
QNX 1 1.32%
That cool OS I just wrote in QBasic (don't laugh, please) 2 2.63%
other 4 5.26%
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2003, 12:23 PM   #31
speter
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Edison, NJ
Distribution: Fedora, Mac OS X
Posts: 313

Rep: Reputation: 30

Quote:
Originally posted by Gill Bates
i thought it was nix based?
Nope. POSIX compliant, but not *nix based.

The multithreading makes it a very zippy system, even on older machines.

Steve
 
Old 10-19-2003, 11:19 PM   #32
agiacalone
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Distribution: Linux Mint, Arch
Posts: 49

Rep: Reputation: 15
Personally, I voted for PalmOS for the same reasons that flapjackboy posted. My other thought was to vote for the Windows OS', but I mainly use those out of necessity, not because I actually WANT to.

Also...what about OpenVMS? I don't actually use it (or even like it), but I know a lot of people that do swear by it.

Last edited by agiacalone; 10-19-2003 at 11:21 PM.
 
Old 10-19-2003, 11:27 PM   #33
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233

Rep: Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406
Quote:
Originally posted by XavierP
And OSX is Unix based
yeah... but <= macos 9.0 isn't unix based, is it?
 
Old 10-20-2003, 12:09 AM   #34
Robert0380
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,280

Rep: Reputation: 47
DOS hands down

kidding


Windows 2000, sometimes XP never 98/Me
 
Old 10-20-2003, 12:20 AM   #35
Megamieuwsel
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Haarlem , the Netherlands
Distribution: VectorLinux SOHO 5.1
Posts: 470

Rep: Reputation: 35
DOS ;best for games.
And before the windows-fanboys start yelling at me :
Take a good hard look at your screen when you start up that Uber-cool game , you're addicted to.
"DOS4GW-protected mode"
That's right : DOS.
Games need direct access to the hardware , not the shell.
 
Old 10-20-2003, 01:41 AM   #36
zekko
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware, debian
Posts: 76

Rep: Reputation: 15
Ahh, I voted Windows, but I only use it for playing games.

And I know of Wine, but it doesn't seem to work as well
 
Old 10-20-2003, 08:38 AM   #37
MrSmee
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Plano, TX
Distribution: Slack
Posts: 84

Rep: Reputation: 15
I guess I'm too old to really "like" windows for the same reason that I really like Linux, I'm still stuck thinking the only time you have any real control is when you've got a STABLE command line to work with....... (for the record, I ran DOS 6.22 up until Win2000 was available)

Smee
 
Old 10-20-2003, 09:11 AM   #38
Nechos
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Italy
Distribution: Ubuntu 13.10
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 30
DOS

well, i'm still on dual boot with win98se wich "the best of the worst" - i like it a lot more than xp or any other win "os" - i know where to find every single file, and i've learned to solve every problem (there's always format c: if everything else fails My Documents is on D: drive )

p.s. yes, format c: is dos, and i think i'll vote for dos, since it was great 8 years ago when i used norton commander more often than win explorer - i was spending almost all of my time in dos...95% of he games were for dos - those for windows were minesweeper ans stuff like that...

Last edited by Nechos; 10-20-2003 at 09:14 AM.
 
Old 10-20-2003, 03:46 PM   #39
Kroppus
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Norway
Distribution: Debian UNSTABLE + latest 2.6.kernel
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 30
*grins*
I'm runing WindowsXP, Windows 1.0 (i finally got it working), Debian, FreDOS and whatever Live-Distro i have just downed.

Freedos or XP is my second choice.
*is still trying to get Duke Nukem 3d to work on FreeDOS*
 
Old 10-20-2003, 04:02 PM   #40
snerfu
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian/GNU
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
OpenBEOS. openbeos.org
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which *nix is best as a desktop? koby *BSD 16 04-02-2005 07:16 PM
What is *nix interface bodh Linux - Newbie 2 10-26-2004 05:24 PM
*NIX aspects nub47 Linux - Newbie 1 09-28-2003 12:06 PM
*nix Rollout ezra143 LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 1 09-20-2003 07:49 AM
any old *nix Guru's out there? rockhopper Linux - General 0 07-17-2002 06:35 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration