LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


View Poll Results: Do You Support Redhats Actions?
Yes, I fully support Red hats actions and i would chip in to the fund 25 67.57%
Yes i support Redhats actions, but i would not chip in to the fund 12 32.43%
No, I do not support Redhat, I think SCO are right in their actions 0 0%
No i do not support Redhats actions, but i do not support SCO Either 0 0%
I Support Windows, hurrra! 0 0%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2003, 07:52 AM   #1
antken
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Posts: 368

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Redhats Actions on SCO


Hello all,

as you may or may not be aware, on monday the 4th of august 2003 Redhat launched a lawsuit against SCO's claim of stolen code in the linux kernel. Basically a put up or shutup, SuSE has recently voiced their support for Redhats's actions, Quoting part of a story from vnu.net:
'SuSE pointed out that SCO had already been stopped in Germany, a reference to a restraining court order made in May requiring SCO's German subsidiary to make its evidence public or retract its claims. It chose the latter.'

Redhat also announced the creation of a fund to provide assistance to other open souce developers that may be faced with similar claims. Redhat themselves put $1 million into this fund to give it a kick start.

My Query is this:

Please answer honestly, Do you support Redhat in their actions, or are you opposed to it?
also, If you support Redhats actions, would you consider 'chipping in' and putting maybe $1 into Redhats Fund?

if you feel the need to post a comment, Please keep it on topic, and no flame wars please



thank you
 
Old 08-07-2003, 12:17 PM   #2
sickboylives
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ohio, USA
Distribution: Slackware 11.0, FreeBSD 6.2
Posts: 98

Rep: Reputation: 15
I support Red Hat's course of action fully. In my view, SCO's trying to "Redmond" it's way around - threatening, blustering, and bluffing, with the hopes that it will end up profiting. Their claims are unfounded as of today, since they've not shown a single piece of evidence.

I guess I'm one of those "show me the money" guys.

It does not help SCO's stance that they have already been smacked down in court once, withdrawing their claims. Guess they didn't read Redmond's history well - never back down willingly, make the federal government TELL you to back down, and even then insist you're right.

SCO's full of it. I hope they end up going bankrupt.
 
Old 08-07-2003, 12:48 PM   #3
trickykid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,149

Rep: Reputation: 269Reputation: 269Reputation: 269
moved: more suitable in the General forum where we have other threads dicussing the whole SCO mess... Regards.
 
Old 08-07-2003, 05:03 PM   #4
nakkaya
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Turkey&USA
Distribution: Emacs and linux is its device driver(Slackware,redhat)
Posts: 1,398

Rep: Reputation: 45
imo we should chip on the found till this day redhat let me download their software use their tools(up2date ,rhn) free for years i have done all my project on free software and i am very satisfied with it i never used it because its free.because its best without emacs gcc i would be dead so i will chip on the found. when i calculate how much i save compared to the chip.
 
Old 08-07-2003, 09:05 PM   #5
BajaNick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: So. Cal.
Distribution: Slack 11
Posts: 1,737

Rep: Reputation: 46
Yes
 
Old 08-07-2003, 09:07 PM   #6
sbilstein
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: south florida
Distribution: red hat 8.0
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 15
Redhat is a good company with good support and awesome up2date (optional unlike microsoft). I really support them and i'd like to donate. SCO is trying to charge the government too, and i doubt that will fly to well.
 
Old 08-20-2003, 11:48 AM   #7
Robert G. Hays
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, Ga., USA
Distribution: Gentoo, Mandrake, ~others
Posts: 157

Rep: Reputation: 30
& I'll lchip in As Soon As I (literally!) have a dollar or 3 to spare. (really, REALLY rugged right this instant -- maybe before the end of the month, I hope!)

GO, REDHAT!

(M$ logo: 'what game do you want to Try to play today', SCO (apparently) logo: '& if you don't like theirs, Pay Us!')
 
Old 08-20-2003, 01:56 PM   #8
Skyline
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian/other
Posts: 2,104

Rep: Reputation: 45
The key to causing SCO problems is to attack it from several different angles at the same time - Red Hat needed to do this.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SCO vs Novell - SCO claims ownership to UNIX Ephracis General 5 10-02-2004 02:55 PM
SCO what a naughty SCO demmylls General 15 12-05-2003 09:19 AM
Grub with Multi-drives/Multi Redhats zuele Linux - Software 1 11-13-2003 04:59 PM
caldera, SCO, SCo group? qanopus General 7 08-25-2003 10:36 AM
get redhats butchered gui's off my damn system! jon_k Linux - Software 1 08-16-2003 01:19 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration