GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by sewer_monkey
Not if you let ppl use HTML in their posts!
HTML in the forums here most likely will never be enabled.
And yes, I agree with acid, image posting within threads and posts is very tacky, slows down page loading and it would be more of a hassle to edit when members link unwanted, vulgar, offensive, pictures on the site.
So your telling me that say a page with 25 posts of everyones desktop at roughly 100-200K a pop would load just as fast as a page with just a link to each respective desktop pic?
I agree with the mods, if I want to click on a picture of a frog on the phone in someone's back yard, I'll click the link.
Originally posted by trickykid HTML in the forums here most likely will never be enabled.
And yes, I agree with acid, image posting within threads and posts is very tacky, slows down page loading and it would be more of a hassle to edit when members link unwanted, vulgar, offensive, pictures on the site.
here's an idea, how about using this site for what it is.. THE best linux forum on the internet, one with no RTFMing, no clique, and NO GIMMICKS. Instead of continually grinding away on your axe here that it doesn't look like your favourite www.l33t-h4x0rzzzzz.ru forum.
thanks geoffm33, nice to know some people get the big picture here....
not to mention the diehard users that only use command line interfaces with text browsers - how would they see all the pics. it would just stuff them up more, anyhow i prefer functionality over beauty (most cases) in a forum like this, even though i have not been a member for very long and am still new to linux, i quite like this site the way it is.
besides i can never be bothered to follow innane links to pics that i couldn't care less about.
i think the links are fine, no images loading up is the best way to do it. I was a bit disappointed that nobody else posted their weird pictures as well though! i think it's fair to do so since the title of the thread "random image" makes it clear that it's images and that it's not relevant to linux questions as such.
Yes Yes BUT.... I see the forum as being a community and with that, you need some variation though if everyone here says no no no no no then i guess i will post my humor attempts elsewhere.
Personally I've always found it nice to see 6 serious questions followed by with a "Best fridge under 5 cubic feet?" it just keeps things well grounded. No one forces your to click on the thread. It's even in the 'general' section. so basically, there is no room for me to complain, nor is there any room for you to complain.
Hey I'm not complaining, the first one was funny. I agree about general, whenever I see a topic here having much to do with puters or Linux I consider it a personal mission to get off topic as quickly as possible.
As far as uploading images go, I'm in agreement with Kewp for different reasons, I don't really care about appearance, but this site is growing by leaps and bounds and although the community is an important aspect, so is keeping the machine it runs on from hiccuping twice and dying. In January the post count passed 50k, a week ago it passed 100, and from rate it looks like it'll make 150k before August. That rate of increase is scary. This is already one of the most active linux help sites around and I fear what'll happen when it pops 1/2 a million (by the same math, early 2003 without a post slowdown) without a machine upgrade.
Not to harp on this, but there is that who Contributing members thing.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.