GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
(insert long thread about merits and demerits of window managers, culminating in vituperous* rants and acid eventually locking the thread)
I think Redhat 7.2 generally was pretty awful - it crashed on first bootup! 7.3 came out very quickly afterwards, and was far more reliable. It was after installing that that I considered looking at other distros which can only have been good.
By far the worst thing I've come across is Nautilus. I'm with Franklin on how it made me hate gnome, it started before I knew I could get rid of it, and just left a bad taste in my mouth. I'd try it again now if flux didn't exist (who'da thunk these tabs were worth something? Damn I am sure thick sometimes )
I know you can run Gnome w/o Nautilus, but at that point you may as well use fluxbox. Its faster and without desktop icons, whats the benefit of gnome.
I'm an icon kind of guy (I guess that makes me iconic ) and my ideal desktop/wm would be flux with icons and a fast filemanager - although I'm getting quite attatched to MC. This was mentioned in another thread somewhere but I havn't gotten arround to trying the suggested options. I think is was the screenshot thread.
Location: Rome, Italy ; Novi Sad, Srbija; Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu / ITOS2008
Posts: 1,207
Rep:
There are two (good) methods to put icons on flux.
One is to use ROX, other to use fbDesk, you can get it at fluxbox.org. There, you got your perfect WM with icons
I also can't wait to try E 0.17. Supposed to be great.
HTH
-NSKL
Well, I have found that qtella and the entire gnutella p2p network is crap. I mean, after waiting 10 minutes to get a connection, search for something, then out of 1000 results only 1 will download without an error.
Perhaps I am just too stoopid to get it configured correctly???
Originally posted by NSKL There are two (good) methods to put icons on flux.
One is to use ROX, other to use fbDesk, you can get it at fluxbox.org. There, you got your perfect WM with icons
I also can't wait to try E 0.17. Supposed to be great.
HTH
-NSKL
Originally posted by bulliver Well, I have found that qtella and the entire gnutella p2p network is crap. I mean, after waiting 10 minutes to get a connection, search for something, then out of 1000 results only 1 will download without an error.
Perhaps I am just too stoopid to get it configured correctly???
Oh yeah...KDE rocks!
I completely second that whole reply. Gnutella sure seems to suck big time! I found DCGui SOOOO much better! Glad I found it too, I was sick of dual booting just for P2P!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.