GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Worked in telecom for years, electronic surveillance has pretty much always been part of the phone network. Manufacturers are required to provide capabilities for lines to be traced and tapped.
Granted this extends that concept a lot; and isn't some of that our fault for helping develop great new collaborative programming or cluster computing technologies?
Why is this surprising? I've heard that VA Staties are the worst for people like me who aren't registered in that state.
Maybe they figured it out to be a boondoggle, strictly for the benefit of a few well-connected gadget peddlers. Perhaps the problem was partly that they're supposed to contribute some of their own money to pay for it, even if it's "forfeiture money."
It is already possible to get a court-ordered wiretap very easily. But it's not often done, because now you have to commit staff time to listening, transcribing, and so on. (The "Siri"-like technologies that promise to "let a computer do it" have not been very successful.) An obviously very-expensive machine to tap every phone is, of course, "illegal as hell," but it is also just a waste of time and money from a law-enforcement point of view.
Right now, as I said in another thread, we are infatuated with the notion of eavesdropping on everything, and there are plenty of hawkers who are bilking Uncle Sugar to the tune of billions of dollars. The people who (literally ...) have their boots on the ground just might see things differently.
Interestingly, now that there is an iota of real public push-back to the notion of turning policemen into stormtroopers, quite a few members of the police forces are stepping up to push-back on the idea, also. Apparently it was initially forced upon them by Homeland Security and the military contractors, who not only paid for it all (at our expense), but also compelled them to accept it. Whereas the officers who actually have to police the city have a very different set of priorities in mind.
War, we must never overlook, is insanely profitable.
... which the industrialists care nothing about. Their children are quite safe.
There's billions of dollars a day to be made from war ... and, now, from "homeland security" (sic). A nation that won't provide health care for its own citizens, won't maintain its own roadways and bridges, won't support college education for a new generation, and so on and on and on, willpay for "War Without End, Amen" ... abroad, and now, at home.
This, of course, is nothing new. Rome, in its declining years, built "Roman Roads to Nowhere" to support its own version of military contractors. We have very-old manuscripts, carved on clay tablets, which bemoan the lawyers. And so on. Human nature is very ... human.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.