GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
There is less than 24 hours left to vote in the 2015 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards. Click here to go to the polls. Vote now and make sure your voice is heard!
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, Slackware Current AMD64, various VMs
The base iPad is "... small, reliable, convenient to use and inexpensive." (compared to computers back then).
Of course that makes it useless for a lot of things some of us like to do with computers.
The raspberry Pi is, apparently, "... small, reliable, convenient to use and inexpensive." if you know what you're doing.
My home PC is "... reliable, convenient to use and inexpensive." for gaming, virtualisation, consuming media and many other things though only because I find Debian easy to use most of the time.
I could pick up a laptop for ~$500 with Windows 7 preinstalled and that would fit the criteria also.
I'd say we're there and we have choice.
Browsing through a blast from my own past, I was reading Steve Wozniak's
Well, them people of the Orchard-worshipping persuasion went with the wrong Steve. I know in your use of 'we', you might be thinking of 'you and me' rather than 'them', but that's part of the answer.
Originally Posted by sundialsvcs
Where did we go so wrong?
And, in a surprisingly technical answer (for a distinctly general question, in 'General'), I think that you could go for 'multitasking'. And GUIs.
Pre-multitasking and pre-GUI, computers could be less capable (less processor, less ram) and still get the job done, because 'the job' was so much less difficult. For a while, 640k was enough for most reasonable single-user requirements, nowadays 640M would be regarded as on the light side. And we are comparing 4 - 8 MHz Z80s and 8086s against 4 GHz Quad core 64 bit monsters.
So, why did we go down this path? Well, to generalise, the idea has been to make things easier for the people at the expense of making them harder for the computers. That trade-off couldn't have been contemplated, at least not to that extent, back in the day because even a VAX 11/750 (1 MIPS!) or a PDP 11/44 wasn't that much faster than a contemporary PC (a few times as fast, not 1000 times as fast). But, these days, we can make that trade-off, so what should we do? It certainly makes my life easier being able to have several programs running and minimise and maximise depending on what is highest on my agenda (that particular millisecond), but maybe having a Raspberry Pi and being more focussed would be better for the karma, I don't know.
It could certainly be better for the 'being able to haul my digital life around with me' aspect, but then a mobile 'phone, potentially, does that, and is way powerful compared top the 'back-in-the-day' PCs. In fact, the big disadvantage of a mobile phone is in the Input and Output area: whatever the other restrictions, I'm not going to be writing anything the length of War and Peace on a touchscreen keyboard. And I'm certainly not going to be taking a printer everywhere, either. But, in principle, a mobile phone is small, reliable(-ish) and certainly can be inexpensive(-ish) compared to computers of the time - while the latest HTC-mega-phone (?) has a noticeable price tag attached, you can buy a phone at the less desirable end of the market quite cheaply (although not a current iPhone, obviously - maybe Woz has an opinion on that). And the phone does a lot of stuff that a computer from back didn't do, obviously - take photos, and even, in extremis, make phone calls, which is nice, potentially.
You can certainly argue that the average Office 'Droid would have had more difficulty adapting to computers, had we not gone down the GUI route. Now, would this have been such a bad thing...