GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
General and post count
I am seriously considering setting up General so that posts will not increment a members post count. Before doing this I would like to see what everyone thinks. Are you for or against this? I am interested in hearing reasons on either side. Thanks.
I am for this in fact which I stated in another poll that a member has started.
I don't think making it retro-active is necessary but if put in place, it would start the day you put this rule in place.
I think it would cut down on the totally nosense type threads and it would not confuse the members who do look at a members post count to determine how knowledgeable they are, etc. I can truly say if we have post counts, it should only be counted on behalf if they contributed to an actual constructive post or thread. Not that there aren't any constructive threads in General but I can't see many arguing that most here are just silly most of the time.
I am for this. With threads around that cover such diverse non-Linux and non-help oriented topics as Koalas, I don't see that these should be counted on one's post-couter. I see General as a place to get to know the other members better, and to discuss random rubbish, and as such shouldn't count. Did that make sense? It's too early here: 02:30am.
Yeah, me too... gotta weigh in on the side of no-karma-for-chatter. In order to not disenfranchise thousands of the contributing community I would really like to see there be a start date on it though. There are plenty of users that bash away at XFree problems and kernel compiles and Snort rulesets that would be more then a little miffed to see their post count drop.
Yep - I'm happy for this to be implemented (even retro-actively) - hopefully improve the quality of some of the threads in General - recently, some of them have took a nose dive......... the sooner the better
I don't really see the point in a post count at all. It doesn't matter to me if a person answering my question has 20,000 posts or 20 as long as their post is helpful.
IMHO, you could just do away with the post count altogether(or just put it in the user's profile).
I have an even better idea, in my opinion: Eliminate the display of post count completely and replace it with a voting system. If a forum participant has found someone's advise to be particularly insightful and useful, they can vote for the person's competence. Of course, if the person gives a canned response that is technically incorrect, not applicable to the mentioned situation, or not well thought in general, the participant can vote against the person's competence.
I know this will probably take some coding, but I think this is the solution everyone's really been searching for.
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
I don't think the post count or titles should be displayed, except possibly in a user's profile. They're essentially meaninless and seem to be abused. The only titles displayed should be, IMHO, moderator, contributor, and root. Nothing else really means anything, and if people are really posting to increase their post count, then they will no longer have a reason to post meaningless drivel.