GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Mumbai was the original name of Bombay before Britishers ruled India.
Britishers had renamed Mumbai to Bombay.
After so many years of freedom, the government decided to give Bombay its original name, Mumbai.
Or more accurately the Hindu Nationalist government decided to rename the cities. This didn't happen until the 90s so it wasn't a function of independence which happened nearly 50 years earlier but rather of a certain political party during its brief stint in power.
"Bombay" and "Calcutta" weren't exactly "English" words but more likely the best approximation English speakers could make of the original names.
It's a bit like renaming Peking to be Beijing. It might matter to the local people but not to native English speakers because the names already sounded exotic to our ears.
P.S. I spent 5 weeks in Mumbai right after India and Pakistan decided to test nuclear weapons. I stayed at the Oberoi and ate at the Taj Mahal Hotel so it was weird to see the attacks on those places a couple of years ago.
Last edited by MensaWater; 03-19-2010 at 08:14 AM.
Or more accurately the Hindu Nationalist government decided to rename the cities. This didn't happen until the 90s so it wasn't a function of independence which happened nearly 50 years earlier but rather of a certain political party during its brief stint in power.
You mean the attacks launched by Pakistan on the Taj hotel, yeah one terrorist was caught alive !
He "confessed" and later recanted his confession. It was amusing to me when I was in India that in the paper it seemed everyone that was arrested "confessed" to whatever they were charged with. I joked to my colleagues that if any of us got arrested for anything while there we should immediately confess even if we didn't do it as it was clear that we would be "encouraged" to do so eventually.
I won't bite on your saying "launched by Pakistan" since their government denies being involved.
I won't bite on your saying "launched by Pakistan" since their government denies being involved.
Of course, the Pakistan government also denied the following matters:
1. Being involved in the twin towers attacks
2. Having sheltered Dawood Ibharim
3. Having promoted the terrorist group Al-Quieda
4. Paving way for the terrorists to get in to Kashmir
...
...
Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 03-19-2010 at 11:25 PM.
Good Morning to all the members of LQ
Back after Saturday and Sunday :P
Bought new shoes yesterday, except that nothing new in life. :P
Have a great day ahead
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.