LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-28-2012, 08:38 AM   #1
rng
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,198

Rep: Reputation: 47
Which is the best debian-testing based rolling-release distro?


I have some experience of working in linux and I can use the command line also. I want to move to debian testing since it has largest number of applications available, it is rolling release (so that I do not lead to reinstall every now and then) and it has updates which are intermediate between very old/stable and very new/untested. On this I intend to install LXDE desktop. There are a number of debian-testing based distributions available, such as anti-X, linux mint debian edition (LMDE) and crunchbang linux. Which one should I choose? Or should I directly install debian-testing? Any suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Old 11-28-2012, 01:54 PM   #2
wpeckham
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Continental USA
Distribution: Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, DSL, Puppy, CentOS, Knoppix, Mint-DE, Sparky, VSIDO, tinycore, Q4OS,Manjaro
Posts: 5,638

Rep: Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697Reputation: 2697
Best?

Best anything is a question loaded for failure. Best for what?

It is difficult to beat the Debian distro. If all you want is a rolling, Debian based, desktop distribution there are several options. Only select one if you have tested and tried it and are sure it does the things YOU want. Loading a bot directly from Debian is a better answer for me, but I tend to more server level 'stuff'.
 
Old 11-28-2012, 02:19 PM   #3
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
I recommend Debian Unstable/Sid for "rolling release Debian." No need to use a derivative distro in my opinion; LXDE is very well supported by the parent distro.
 
Old 11-29-2012, 06:16 AM   #4
fatmac
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,496

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Basically, I would say Debian, because all the derivatives are based on it, so Debian is naturally going to be the first released.
 
Old 11-29-2012, 07:12 AM   #5
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Hiding somewhere on planet Earth.
Distribution: No distribution. OpenBSD operating system
Posts: 1,711
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635Reputation: 635
Debian Testing is not a rolling release. Additions and changes are made until about half a year before it becomes the next Stable release. (Where it is now.) After that point, nothing is added. The purpose is to work out any bugs before it is released as Stable. The reason Debian is a stable system, is because it is not a rolling release. (New packages and new versions of existing packages added immediately. Bugs and all.)

Quote:
updates which are intermediate between very old/stable and very new/untested
Interesting idea. A system is either stable or it is not stable. "Intermediate" means only a little unstable. Debian is the wrong place to look for such a thing.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-29-2012, 08:41 AM   #6
rng
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,198

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
Quote:
Debian Testing is not a rolling release.
I think it is cyclically-rolling release as you explain and from the refs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling...Debian-related

Anyway, I got myself debian-testing-lxde iso and tried to install it on an external usb drive (sdb). I was shocked when it installed grub2 on sda. I thought it would install grub2 on mbr of sdb and there was no prior notice or confirmation asked.

Also, although I was installing from CD, it tried to setup network so as to arrange for packages from the net. I could not configure the network properly, so I ended up with only the base system installed (not lxde desktop).

Most likely these problems are due to my ignorance/inexperience in this area but please help me sort these out. Thanks for your help.
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:01 AM   #7
rng
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,198

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
I managed to sort out both above problems and I now have LXDE desktop on debian testing. But I wanted to have a true rolling-release distro so that there would be no need to reinstall but only upgrade to maintain the system. Should I go in for Linux mint debian edition (LMDE) which is truly rolling-release (http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2010/12/29...dition-review/) or can my make my present setup a rolling-release one? After all, LMDE is also based on debian testing (according to above review). Your comments will be very helpful. Thanks.
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:12 AM   #8
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753

Rep: Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935
With any and all 'rolling release' distros/versions there is a chance of breakage. I would not be installing a rolling release distro just to avoid reinstalling....its quite possible that you'll have to do more reinstalling with a rolling release if/when something breaks. Or spend just as much time as you would reinstalling, if not more, asking forums 'how do I fix XXXXX' when an update/upgrade breaks something.

LMDE used to use debian testing repos, now its got its own repos. I'd use debian testing over LMDE.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-30-2012, 01:19 AM   #9
rng
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,198

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
I wanted to clarify one point. Can one changes the /etc/apt/sources.list file at any time in a debian based distro and update/upgrade? Can I change from debian testing to unstable repositories at any time? Will it cause problems?
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:38 AM   #10
descendant_command
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,876

Rep: Reputation: 643Reputation: 643Reputation: 643Reputation: 643Reputation: 643Reputation: 643
Yes you can, and maybe it will, depends on what packages you have installed and your definition of "problems".

Last edited by descendant_command; 11-30-2012 at 01:39 AM.
 
Old 11-30-2012, 01:50 AM   #11
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637
LMDE is NOT a rolling release and is even less so now than Debian Testing because of how it has its own repository setup. If you want a true rollong release from Debian you will never find it. Sid (unstable) is the closest thing to a true rolling release from Debian as you will ever get but when Testing goes into freeze Sid also slows down.
 
Old 11-30-2012, 07:50 AM   #12
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by rng View Post
I managed to sort out both above problems and I now have LXDE desktop on debian testing. But I wanted to have a true rolling-release distro so that there would be no need to reinstall but only upgrade to maintain the system. Should I go in for Linux mint debian edition (LMDE) which is truly rolling-release (http://www.linuxbsdos.com/2010/12/29...dition-review/) or can my make my present setup a rolling-release one? After all, LMDE is also based on debian testing (according to above review). Your comments will be very helpful. Thanks.
Debian Testing is the Alpha/Beta/Release Candidate for the next Stable release, I don't really consider it a "rolling release" and it has the greatest risk of breakage of the Debian repos in my opinion/experience. (Although right now it is really quite stable due to the pending Stable release; after that, packages will come flooding in from Unstable and things get weird for a while.)

My personal preference is Stable. There is also no "need to reinstall but only upgrade to maintain the system" with Stable, because upgrading to the next Stable when it comes out does not require a reinstall. This is true of almost all distros, which is why I've never really bought into the "rolling release" concept personally.
 
Old 11-30-2012, 12:07 PM   #13
rng
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,198

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
Thanks everyone for your suggestions. Considering everything, I have decided to stick with debian for now. As I mentioned above, there was a problem during the installation. I have basic install + lxde desktop. However, I think not all packages from cdrom were installed. The /etc/apt/sources.list file has only one line:
Quote:
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Wheezy_ - Official Snapshot i386 lxde-CD Binary-1 20121126-03:42]/ wheezy main
How can I know whether all packages from cdrom were installed and how can I install all remaining packages?

Also, I think I would need to change the source.list to following, before I can install anything from the internet:
Quote:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free

deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates main contrib non-free
I will then probably need to run "apt-get update" and "apt-get upgrade" commands.

Please advise.
 
Old 11-30-2012, 12:11 PM   #14
snowday
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,667

Rep: Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411Reputation: 1411
^--- No, you never mix stable and testing repos.

If you don't have an active internet connection when you install then the debian installer will assume you want to use local CD-ROM, that's why your sources.list looks like that.

Here is a debian source list generator you might find helpful: http://debgen.simplylinux.ch/
 
Old 11-30-2012, 12:19 PM   #15
k3lt01
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900

Rep: Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637Reputation: 637
That's pretty much the standard sources list when you install of a CD, if you installed of a dvd the cd would be dvd. If you had used a dvd instead of a cd you would have installed the full system without having to connect to the internet. The cd pretty much just provides the basic Desktop Environment.

Anyway just adjust your sources.list and run
Code:
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
in that order, then install any new packages you want to install.

Snowpine is spot on don't mix stable with anything else unless it is backports for stable.

Last edited by k3lt01; 11-30-2012 at 12:21 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] What Precisely is a Rolling Distro or Release? theKbStockpiler Linux - General 12 04-09-2012 07:56 PM
Non rolling release source based distros? bowbalitic Linux - Newbie 11 10-11-2010 03:03 AM
Rolling release distro with actual installer? danbuter Linux - General 5 04-13-2010 09:01 PM
A rolling release Distro.... firewiz87 Linux - Distributions 36 11-23-2009 11:28 PM
I want to use the cinch installer for a new distro based on debian testing. mdmarmer cAos 0 08-08-2009 11:56 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration