DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The assumption, I believe, is that if people are using Debian over any one of the clones it's because of the philosophy.
I've used Ubuntu, and then switched to Debian, and stuck. Frankly, if I'd look at it another way, personally I see no reason to use Ubuntu instead of Debian. I switched U->D because I couldn't get Apache HTTPD/OpenSSH-Server packages to work. I simply couldn't. I understand that it's The distribution attracting new people at the moment, but I've found it also somewhat means most of it's comunity is new to linux, thus looking for help instead of being able to provide it.
I am personally using Debian because some of their clones are too bloated (for a lack of a better word). I have only tried 1 of them out, but that was enough for me to use the real thing full time. And no I am not trying to draw critisism, that is just my
I think I will just install Firefox from the Mozilla site. Not that I don't want to support IceWeasel as a more "free" project, but for now I want to stick with Firefox (one of my friends doesn't like the name IceWeasel either, says it sounds evil and underhanded, so he's sticking with Konqueror. ).
The problem is, I don't know how to install Firefox 'properly' on my system. I could just run it straight from the desktop, but that's not exactly to my liking. :P Should I just dump the whole folder right into /usr/share? Do I need to put all that firefox stuff in /usr/lib?
I kinda hope they just put Firefox in non-free . . .
If you want it available to all users install it to /usr/local/
It is a spot made for such use and apt does not touch it so you don't have to worry about an upgrade messing things up.
And putting firefox in non-free would have the same problems as main once the freeze hits. They would have to run every patch - including security - through mozilla corp before securing the browser and hope that mozilla does not tell Debian no to a patch.
Last edited by JackieBrown; 10-26-2006 at 09:34 AM.
Does anyone know when the iceweasel packages will start hitting the repositories? I just went looking for it, and it isn't even in experimental yet.
Is Firefox simply going to be switched over to Iceweasel when Etch is released? I'm not a developer or a member of the project, just a user, but that kind of seems like it wouldn't follow the development guidelines if that were the case.
Is Firefox simply going to be switched over to Iceweasel when Etch is released?
Probably, since thats what they did with Thunderbird/Icedove in Etch a couple of days ago. I did a dist-upgrade and it simply deleted Thunderbird and installed Icedove and left a thunderbird->icedove symlink.
It kept and is still using my ~/.mozilla-thunderbird folder though.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.