LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2005, 03:12 PM   #1
gherikill
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 15
Linux Firefox Slower than Windows Firefox on same machine


I have noticed that Firefox on linux renders things much slower than on the same machine in Windows Xp sp2. PIII 600 MHZ 640 MB RAM, Voodoo 3 card.

Anyone else have this problem?
 
Old 05-17-2005, 03:36 PM   #2
mebrelith
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Torreón, Coahuila, México
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 342
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 30
What distro?
 
Old 05-17-2005, 04:13 PM   #3
oldforce
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Turkey, Istanbul
Distribution: Novel Suse Professional 9.3
Posts: 86

Rep: Reputation: 15
suse 9.3

i have the same problem..
opera and firefox loads slower than their windows versions.
what is he reason..
i have p4 2.4 512mb ram geforce mx440
 
Old 05-17-2005, 04:36 PM   #4
mebrelith
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Torreón, Coahuila, México
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 342
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 30
Its a matter of distros guys. Most distros are compiled for i386 pcs and therefore dont get all the power out of any processor. My Firefox runs faster, feels more stable and works better in my Linux box (Gentoo) then in any Windoze PC Ive seen it.
 
Old 05-17-2005, 05:14 PM   #5
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 4,732
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 456Reputation: 456Reputation: 456Reputation: 456Reputation: 456
To get Firefox to load quicker you can use prelink.
"prelink is a program which modifies ELF shared libraries and ELF dynamically linked binaries, so that the time which dynamic linker needs for their relocation at startup significantly decreases and also due to fewer relocations the run-time memory consumption decreases too (especially number of unshareable pages). Such prelinking information is only used if all its dependant libraries have not changed since prelinking, otherwise programs are relocated normally."
http://www.maconlinux.net/linux-man-...prelink.8.html

After prelinking Firefox loads faster than Konqueror or Opera.

On my Debian system Firefox loads faster than it did on WinME.

There are ways you can tweak the speed up Firefox itself.
"Speed up Firefox"
http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/index.php?showtopic=2875
 
Old 05-17-2005, 05:19 PM   #6
Moloko
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 729

Rep: Reputation: 30
It's very important to have a kernel compiled for your processor type. Running an i386 kernel on a AMD or Pentium is a waste. These kernels are installed by default by most distributions.

Having software compiled for the processor type is less important.
 
Old 05-18-2005, 09:39 AM   #7
gherikill
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 56

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I'm not talking about load time, I'm talking about page renedering speed. I'm using SUse 9.3 but Firefox is compiled i586.

Just out of interest. Are windows xp binaries compiled for processor arch of the system or are they all i386.
 
Old 05-18-2005, 10:10 AM   #8
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 4,732
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 456Reputation: 456Reputation: 456Reputation: 456Reputation: 456
I think it depends entirely on how your system and kernel are compiled. And how Firefox is compiled as well. The number of extensions and the theme you use can change the way Firefox works as well.

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517 Firefox/1.0.4 (Debian package 1.0.4-2)

kernel 2.6.11 i686 GNU/Linux

Anthlon 1.8Mhz,1GB DDRram 400mhz, cable broadband 3MB
With the above, pages load faster on Linux than they do using WinME, same machine dualboot separate harddrives.

I have tested pages loading with IE6,Opera8, Galeon, Mozilla, Konqueror, Epiphany and Firefox; and Firefox beats them all. I do have it tweaked quite a bit and only use 16 extensions.
 
Old 05-20-2005, 08:58 AM   #9
gherikill
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 56

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
ttt
 
Old 12-09-2007, 09:47 AM   #10
jago25_98
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 30
This will improve when Firefox3 goes stable.

The problem started about 2.0.0... something I think.

In the mean time I've noticed that gnome's epiphany-browser is a bit quicker, even though it still uses the problematic gecko backend. Faster than swiftfox but with less functionality it seems.

As for optimised compilation, that's great but it may well be addressing the symptoms rather than the cause. Still a good idea for now and the future though. It's made me realise I need to optimise this 386 compiled setup here.

edit:: Changing to 686 kernel from 386 isn't supposed to help nowadays - the kernel now detects this stuff automagically

Last edited by jago25_98; 12-09-2007 at 10:02 AM.
 
Old 12-09-2007, 11:40 AM   #11
shadowsnipes
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,441

Rep: Reputation: 70
Using Swiftfox might at least give you the the impression the pages are loading faster. Or you can try Swiftweasel.

I actually have a machine where firefox seems to be slower on linux than windows as well. I think it is primarily because my graphics card isn't well supported in linux and the CPU is old (PII) so too much work gets put on my old CPU.

Last edited by shadowsnipes; 12-11-2007 at 01:04 PM. Reason: I meant swiftweasel not iceweasel - probably why iceweasel changed its name
 
Old 02-20-2008, 08:42 AM   #12
tomfoth
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Virtual XP beats the host.

I'm Running firefox in fedora 8 (x86_64) with a quad core and 4G RAM. On top on that I'm running XP x86_64 in vmware. Firefox loads and renders MUCH quicker on the virtual machine that on the host.

So much so, I use a virtual XP machine for web browsing. Isn't that a little odd?

--------------------
There are 2 kinds of people: Those that understand octal and those that don't

Last edited by tomfoth; 02-20-2008 at 08:44 AM.
 
Old 02-20-2008, 12:23 PM   #13
jago25_98
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 30
..and this is before we get to the slowness of Flash.

This is madness. It shouldn't be like this.

I wonder if perhaps I'm doing something differently to the people who do the coding.
 
Old 02-20-2008, 12:49 PM   #14
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 2,521
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 208Reputation: 208Reputation: 208
the reason is the full java system and add on plugins they take a litlle time to to start the program and get it going when you run a browser it uses many programs and linux runs them as needed then they run stable and smooth. the thing is stable and smooth I use firefox seamonkey and opera opera blows them all away. but firefox downlod is faster. opera 9.25 with flash9 makes youtube real nice. pluss the speed dial on the open page. cofigure your kernel for i686 and compile and install have fun and fast.
 
Old 02-20-2008, 02:13 PM   #15
shadowsnipes
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,441

Rep: Reputation: 70
For some people I noticed that pages render more slowly because their firewall is blocking general use ports that a site may try to use. This is most apparent, for instance, when trying to watch a video on YouTube. So, if you find pages are loading slowly, tail your firewall logs at the same time. That way you can see if there is any relation.

In general, however, I find that Firefox actually opens quicker and is a little peppier than its Windows counterpart. This comparison is done using a shared profile between Windows and Linux, so there isn't a difference in addons. The plugins are different, though.

I agree that flash seems to work a little better on Windows than Linux.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Konqueror Slower than Firefox TigerLinux Linux - Software 3 11-24-2005 01:08 AM
firefox on windows and firefox on linux boxerboy Fedora 7 08-13-2005 06:49 PM
Xandros and Firefox is slower then the second coming... coopns Linux - Newbie 6 03-31-2005 08:22 AM
Symlinking Firefox Extensions from Windows to Firefox? apachedude Linux - Software 11 11-26-2004 05:00 AM
firefox running slow as hell ! (loading ppages slower than my 56k) qwijibow Linux - Software 6 08-24-2004 09:25 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration