DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Why on earth would you use apt from experimental...?
To solve this you're probably going to have to manually download apt 8.15.x from unstable, remove your current apt using dpkg and then install the unstable one in the same way.
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Original Poster
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caravel
Why on earth would you use apt from experimental...?
To solve this you're probably going to have to manually download apt 8.15.x from unstable, remove your current apt using dpkg and then install the unstable one in the same way.
Well, I installed the thing as it is part of the Gnome3 packages. I have, or had before installing apt, a very nice working install of Gnome Shell.
It is somewhat rough around the edges but is running well enough that, except for this screw up, it would work fine as a production OS.
The main problems I am having are all "picnic" related. The guy on the chair is having his first experience with the experimental repo. Man is he ever hard of learning. Enthusiastic, stubborn and none too bright, if you ask me. I will ding him up side the head next time I see him in the mirror.
I will give that a whack. Thanks a lot.
Edit;
The victim installation is NOT a production OS. I may be slow but am not that stupid.
I installed gnome3 on my Sid installation less than a week ago, for testing purposes only, and it did not upgrade apt - which gnome 3 package pulled in apt?
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Original Poster
Rep:
It was listed by aptitude. Apt-listbugs did not have any thing to say about it so I did it.
Ignorance is bliss. For a very short time.
Still working on it. Don't have much time to get over there. Will be doing some today and may have time to get it straight. May just start over if that doesn't get it.
Could have more problems, have gotten more experience fooling with this so that may be the thing to do. I do like trying to fix things first though as reinstalling is just to MS for me to like.
Besides fixing my screw ups is very educational and helpful in the long run.
I kind of like gnome3. I think I will be going to Xfce probably but I think my wife will prefer GS as a desktop. With the "friperies" extensions it seems quite usable. I am, however, a grumpy geezer with a pretty set way of working that seems to fit with xfce better.
I have a Wheezy install that I am using for DE experimentation. Gnome, open box, lxde and xfce on it. Had e17 but didn't like it at all (probably lack of taste) so removed it. Xfce is about configured to my liking, have to see if I can get it the rest of the way there. Lxde could get there too, someday, need to work with it more.
It was listed by aptitude. Apt-listbugs did not have any thing to say about it so I did it.
aptitude would definitely not have been a dependency of any part of gnome 3 - I seriously doubt aptitude is a dependency of anything in fact (please feel free to correct me if you can show it listed as one on packages.debian.org) as it in itself is a front end for apt - so I'm not sure how it got installed from experimental unless you did something rather "daring" such as:
Code:
aptitude -t experimental full-upgrade
You won't learn much from that apart from what a broken system is like.
Not seeing reports in apt-listbugs is normal, nor is that a reliable means of assessing the bugginess or stability or packages from the experimental repo - for apt-listbugs to be of use, someone needs to report the bugs - if they report a critical bug 20 minutes after you installed...? Experimental packages are by their nature very volatile so any bugs in one particular version may not even be found until it enters unstable or even testing.
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Original Poster
Rep:
I am not sure how this came about. I keep, for a short time, a copy of the result of commands for reference and do not see any that should have (like the full-upgrade) caused this.
It happened, I will be keeping my copies longer, I will be doing more backups also.
Distribution: Debian Testing, Stable, Sid and Manjaro, Mageia 3, LMDE
Posts: 2,628
Original Poster
Rep:
Back up and running. It was not looking as good as it was but it was up. Must have screwed other things at the same time.
Ran in another install. It looks better than before.
Never really fooled with dpkg commands beyond --conrigure and reconfigure. Real handy. Need to mess with that more when things are working right instead of broken.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.