LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2012, 04:11 PM   #1
cccc
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623

Rep: Reputation: 51
strange backup problem using Acronis True Image Home 2011


hi

I'm using Acronis True Image Home 2011 to backup my Debian machines and have a really strange problem.
I've 1,1 GB Squeeze (EXT4) *.tib image, if I restore it from NAS and make some changes like online updates, change desktop etc.
and try to backup into NAS again using Acronis, then the image file increases to more than 3GB!
Even if I delete lot of files and the image file should be lower.
I didn't have these problems with EXT3.
This happens quite often and cannot find any solution.

Last edited by cccc; 01-28-2012 at 04:35 PM.
 
Old 01-28-2012, 04:43 PM   #2
Doc CPU
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099

Rep: Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc View Post
I'm using Acronis True Image Home 2011 ...
so am I, for my Windows (2000 and XP) and Linux machines (Ubuntu and Mint).

Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc View Post
I've 1,1 GB Squeeze (EXT4) *.tib image, if I restore it from NAS and make some changes like online updates, change desktop etc. and try to backup into NAS again using Acronis, then the image file increases to more than 3GB!
That sounds weird, but I don't fully understand what you really do, and I've never had a problem like that. Could you explain that a bit more clearly?

[X] Doc CPU
 
Old 01-28-2012, 06:23 PM   #3
cccc
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc CPU View Post

That sounds weird, but I don't fully understand what you really do, and I've never had a problem like that. Could you explain that a bit more clearly?

[X] Doc CPU
I've Squeeze setuped on a PC.
I've done a backup of the whole hard disk using Acronis over LAN to a NAS.
*tib image file is 1,1 GB.
I've restored it from NAS on the same PC.
I've done online updates and I've created an image file with Acronis again.
Now is the *tib image file larger than 3GB.

BTW I've already tried with different NAS and LAN, but still the same problem.
 
Old 01-29-2012, 07:22 AM   #4
Doc CPU
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099

Rep: Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc View Post
I've Squeeze setuped on a PC.
I've done a backup of the whole hard disk using Acronis over LAN to a NAS.
*tib image file is 1,1 GB.
I've restored it from NAS on the same PC.
I've done online updates and I've created an image file with Acronis again.
Now is the *tib image file larger than 3GB.
alright, now I understand what you mean.
And maybe that's perfectly normal, but your information isn't enough to be sure.

Look at the used capacity on that partition before making the image. I guess it's somewhere along 1.5 .. 2GB.
Look at the used capacity after you ran the updates: Is it considerably more?

The key to the explanation is probably data reduction and compression. By default, Acronis uses two methods to reduce the size of the image file:
  • It only backs up the blocks that are actually used, and ignores unused space. That's why the image isn't as large as the partition being imaged.
  • It creates a compressed image. Typically, you save about 30..50% space that way. However, the actual compression ratio varies very much depending of the data itself.

With that knowledge, it looks as though after the update there's a lot more space used on your partition than before. It's still an awful lot - considering a typical compression ratio, that would be a net growth of 3..4GB. Impressing, but not impossible. Maybe lots of temporary files left over?

[X] Doc CPU
 
Old 01-29-2012, 08:37 PM   #5
cccc
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 51
Here is the disk capacity before any changes, recovered from a 1,19 GB tib image file:
Code:
$ df -mT
Dateisystem   Typ    1M‐Blöcke   Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1     ext4       11250      2408      8270  23% /
tmpfs        tmpfs        1009         0      1009   0% /lib/init/rw
udev         tmpfs        1004         1      1004   1% /dev
tmpfs        tmpfs        1009         1      1009   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda7     ext4        1876        80      1701   5% /home
/dev/sda6     ext4         942        17       878   2% /tmp
/dev/sda5     ext4        2811       368      2300  14% /var
and here after updates:
Code:
$ df -mT
Dateisystem   Typ    1M‐Blöcke   Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1     ext4       11250      2430      8247  23% /
tmpfs        tmpfs        1009         0      1009   0% /lib/init/rw
udev         tmpfs        1004         1      1004   1% /dev
tmpfs        tmpfs        1009         1      1009   1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda7     ext4        1876        80      1701   5% /home
/dev/sda6     ext4         942        17       878   2% /tmp
/dev/sda5     ext4        2811       379      2290  15% /var
Now, if I do an Acronis image, then increases to 3GB!
 
Old 01-30-2012, 04:21 AM   #6
Doc CPU
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099

Rep: Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344Reputation: 344
Hi there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc View Post
Here is the disk capacity before any changes, recovered from a 1,19 GB tib image file:
I guess we're talking about the root file system on /dev/sda1.

Code:
Dateisystem   Typ    1M‐Blöcke   Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1     ext4       11250      2408      8270  23% /
So that's 2408 blocks of 1MB size, about 2.4GB. If you get a 1.2GB image file, you have a pretty good compression ratio, but that's plausible.

Code:
Dateisystem   Typ    1M‐Blöcke   Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1     ext4       11250      2430      8247  23% /
Now there's 22 blocks more, which is negligible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc View Post
Now, if I do an Acronis image, then increases to 3GB!
That's weird - it would mean the compressed image file is 50% larger than the uncompressed data. Now I don't have a clue any more. :-(

[X] Doc CPU
 
Old 01-30-2012, 07:10 PM   #7
cccc
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 51
Yep, that's really weird and still cannot find any solution.
 
Old 03-04-2012, 12:08 PM   #8
cccc
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 51
Perhaps, this problem occurs after converting Ext3 to Ext4.
I've done a fresh Squeeze installation with Ext4 and it works well now.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Acronis True Image Rewrote Master Boot Record winger Linux - General 23 11-07-2009 09:00 PM
Acronis True Image ? cccc Linux - Software 1 11-29-2008 10:10 AM
Installing Acronis True Image - SnapAPI problem PlymWS SUSE / openSUSE 1 03-26-2008 02:09 AM
A backup utility like Acronis true image Ineed2muchHelp Linux - Software 3 11-27-2006 12:22 AM
Ghost 9 or Acronis True Image 8? nathanv117 SUSE / openSUSE 0 01-09-2005 08:11 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration