strange backup problem using Acronis True Image Home 2011
DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
strange backup problem using Acronis True Image Home 2011
hi
I'm using Acronis True Image Home 2011 to backup my Debian machines and have a really strange problem.
I've 1,1 GB Squeeze (EXT4) *.tib image, if I restore it from NAS and make some changes like online updates, change desktop etc.
and try to backup into NAS again using Acronis, then the image file increases to more than 3GB!
Even if I delete lot of files and the image file should be lower.
I didn't have these problems with EXT3.
This happens quite often and cannot find any solution.
so am I, for my Windows (2000 and XP) and Linux machines (Ubuntu and Mint).
Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc
I've 1,1 GB Squeeze (EXT4) *.tib image, if I restore it from NAS and make some changes like online updates, change desktop etc. and try to backup into NAS again using Acronis, then the image file increases to more than 3GB!
That sounds weird, but I don't fully understand what you really do, and I've never had a problem like that. Could you explain that a bit more clearly?
That sounds weird, but I don't fully understand what you really do, and I've never had a problem like that. Could you explain that a bit more clearly?
[X] Doc CPU
I've Squeeze setuped on a PC.
I've done a backup of the whole hard disk using Acronis over LAN to a NAS.
*tib image file is 1,1 GB.
I've restored it from NAS on the same PC.
I've done online updates and I've created an image file with Acronis again.
Now is the *tib image file larger than 3GB.
BTW I've already tried with different NAS and LAN, but still the same problem.
I've Squeeze setuped on a PC.
I've done a backup of the whole hard disk using Acronis over LAN to a NAS.
*tib image file is 1,1 GB.
I've restored it from NAS on the same PC.
I've done online updates and I've created an image file with Acronis again.
Now is the *tib image file larger than 3GB.
alright, now I understand what you mean.
And maybe that's perfectly normal, but your information isn't enough to be sure.
Look at the used capacity on that partition before making the image. I guess it's somewhere along 1.5 .. 2GB.
Look at the used capacity after you ran the updates: Is it considerably more?
The key to the explanation is probably data reduction and compression. By default, Acronis uses two methods to reduce the size of the image file:
It only backs up the blocks that are actually used, and ignores unused space. That's why the image isn't as large as the partition being imaged.
It creates a compressed image. Typically, you save about 30..50% space that way. However, the actual compression ratio varies very much depending of the data itself.
With that knowledge, it looks as though after the update there's a lot more space used on your partition than before. It's still an awful lot - considering a typical compression ratio, that would be a net growth of 3..4GB. Impressing, but not impossible. Maybe lots of temporary files left over?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.