Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-28-2012, 04:11 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623
Rep:
|
strange backup problem using Acronis True Image Home 2011
hi
I'm using Acronis True Image Home 2011 to backup my Debian machines and have a really strange problem.
I've 1,1 GB Squeeze (EXT4) *.tib image, if I restore it from NAS and make some changes like online updates, change desktop etc.
and try to backup into NAS again using Acronis, then the image file increases to more than 3GB!
Even if I delete lot of files and the image file should be lower.
I didn't have these problems with EXT3.
This happens quite often and cannot find any solution.
Last edited by cccc; 01-28-2012 at 04:35 PM.
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 04:43 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099
|
Hi there,
Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc
I'm using Acronis True Image Home 2011 ...
|
so am I, for my Windows (2000 and XP) and Linux machines (Ubuntu and Mint).
Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc
I've 1,1 GB Squeeze (EXT4) *.tib image, if I restore it from NAS and make some changes like online updates, change desktop etc. and try to backup into NAS again using Acronis, then the image file increases to more than 3GB!
|
That sounds weird, but I don't fully understand what you really do, and I've never had a problem like that. Could you explain that a bit more clearly?
[X] Doc CPU
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 06:23 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc CPU
That sounds weird, but I don't fully understand what you really do, and I've never had a problem like that. Could you explain that a bit more clearly?
[X] Doc CPU
|
I've Squeeze setuped on a PC.
I've done a backup of the whole hard disk using Acronis over LAN to a NAS.
*tib image file is 1,1 GB.
I've restored it from NAS on the same PC.
I've done online updates and I've created an image file with Acronis again.
Now is the *tib image file larger than 3GB.
BTW I've already tried with different NAS and LAN, but still the same problem.
|
|
|
01-29-2012, 07:22 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099
|
Hi there,
Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc
I've Squeeze setuped on a PC.
I've done a backup of the whole hard disk using Acronis over LAN to a NAS.
*tib image file is 1,1 GB.
I've restored it from NAS on the same PC.
I've done online updates and I've created an image file with Acronis again.
Now is the *tib image file larger than 3GB.
|
alright, now I understand what you mean.
And maybe that's perfectly normal, but your information isn't enough to be sure.
Look at the used capacity on that partition before making the image. I guess it's somewhere along 1.5 .. 2GB.
Look at the used capacity after you ran the updates: Is it considerably more?
The key to the explanation is probably data reduction and compression. By default, Acronis uses two methods to reduce the size of the image file: - It only backs up the blocks that are actually used, and ignores unused space. That's why the image isn't as large as the partition being imaged.
- It creates a compressed image. Typically, you save about 30..50% space that way. However, the actual compression ratio varies very much depending of the data itself.
With that knowledge, it looks as though after the update there's a lot more space used on your partition than before. It's still an awful lot - considering a typical compression ratio, that would be a net growth of 3..4GB. Impressing, but not impossible. Maybe lots of temporary files left over?
[X] Doc CPU
|
|
|
01-29-2012, 08:37 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Here is the disk capacity before any changes, recovered from a 1,19 GB tib image file:
Code:
$ df -mT
Dateisystem Typ 1M‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1 ext4 11250 2408 8270 23% /
tmpfs tmpfs 1009 0 1009 0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs 1004 1 1004 1% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 1009 1 1009 1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda7 ext4 1876 80 1701 5% /home
/dev/sda6 ext4 942 17 878 2% /tmp
/dev/sda5 ext4 2811 368 2300 14% /var
and here after updates:
Code:
$ df -mT
Dateisystem Typ 1M‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1 ext4 11250 2430 8247 23% /
tmpfs tmpfs 1009 0 1009 0% /lib/init/rw
udev tmpfs 1004 1 1004 1% /dev
tmpfs tmpfs 1009 1 1009 1% /dev/shm
/dev/sda7 ext4 1876 80 1701 5% /home
/dev/sda6 ext4 942 17 878 2% /tmp
/dev/sda5 ext4 2811 379 2290 15% /var
Now, if I do an Acronis image, then increases to 3GB!
|
|
|
01-30-2012, 04:21 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Distribution: Mint, Debian, Gentoo, Win 2k/XP
Posts: 1,099
|
Hi there,
Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc
Here is the disk capacity before any changes, recovered from a 1,19 GB tib image file:
|
I guess we're talking about the root file system on /dev/sda1.
Code:
Dateisystem Typ 1M‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1 ext4 11250 2408 8270 23% /
So that's 2408 blocks of 1MB size, about 2.4GB. If you get a 1.2GB image file, you have a pretty good compression ratio, but that's plausible.
Code:
Dateisystem Typ 1M‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sda1 ext4 11250 2430 8247 23% /
Now there's 22 blocks more, which is negligible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cccc
Now, if I do an Acronis image, then increases to 3GB!
|
That's weird - it would mean the compressed image file is 50% larger than the uncompressed data. Now I don't have a clue any more. :-(
[X] Doc CPU
|
|
|
01-30-2012, 07:10 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yep, that's really weird and still cannot find any solution.
|
|
|
03-04-2012, 12:08 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian Squeeze / Wheezy
Posts: 1,623
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Perhaps, this problem occurs after converting Ext3 to Ext4.
I've done a fresh Squeeze installation with Ext4 and it works well now.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|