DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
They manage with portage. It does the heavy lifting in terms of sorting out the various build dependencies. You are doing everything by hand, so "I do not know how LFS users manage" would have been a more appropriate comment.
That said, they key is time and patience and/or being open to alternative options.
libqt4-qt3support is already installed. Moreover, according to the thread you pointed out, there will be problems even after the configure stage. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...issues-908486/
I think I will stop trying further on this package. Thanks for your help.
Thanks for the Debian's neuro science repository and dcm2niigui link.
Gentoo' portage sounds like Arch linux's yaourt package manager which downloads sources and compiles and install them locally. But manual intervention is needed very often. Filling dependencies by hand reminds me of my short time with slackware. I think Debian is overall the best distribution for a stable, long term use.
Actually it is generally much easier to compile stuff 'manually' on Slackware because the recommended install (full) includes a nice, wide range of development libs, so many apps simply compile without having to hunt down anything. It is one of the reasons Slackware is my favourite distro, it makes stuff like this easy. I certainly favour it to Debian or any of its derivatives.
One thing that I found difficult to handle in Slackware were different releases/versions. I had to be careful that programs were for 13.1 and not 12.2, etc. With Debian-testing, I hope to just keep doing regular updates and there is no need to bother about versions. This is basically an advantage of rolling release distribution.
Another advantage seems to be that most software authors provide a Debian/Ubuntu/Mint version of the software, or rpm versions which also can be used in Debian; Slackware and Arch versions are less often provided.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.