LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Debian
User Name
Password
Debian This forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2005, 04:44 PM   #1
flying-tuxman
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Italy-Mexico
Distribution: Archlinux, Slackware, Slax, DSL, Knoppix-mib
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 15
i686 optimized distro wanted


hi,
I'm looking for a debian-based distro that is optimized for i686 processors and possibly uses fluxbox as main window manager.
anyone has some suggestion?

thanks

tuxman
 
Old 05-03-2005, 05:51 PM   #2
macondo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,016

Rep: Reputation: 49
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...icle&artid=330

Follow the instructions, and install Fluxbox and the kernel-image-686 you want with apt-get, it can't get easier than this.
 
Old 05-03-2005, 07:53 PM   #3
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
that would just give you an i686 kernel... the OP was asking for an i686 distro...


Last edited by win32sux; 05-03-2005 at 08:11 PM.
 
Old 05-03-2005, 08:03 PM   #4
flying-tuxman
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Italy-Mexico
Distribution: Archlinux, Slackware, Slax, DSL, Knoppix-mib
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
yes,
what im looking for is a distro sort of archlinux or vidalinux but debian based.
yoper for instance, is debian sort of compatible, yet its not pure debian.
something thought up for latest pentium users who would not build a system from scratch.

thanks.

sailor
 
Old 05-03-2005, 08:08 PM   #5
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
i've tried searching for an i686 debian-based distro but it seems i've lost my google powers...

i take it you are 100% decided on the debian-based factor, right??

like, you won't settle for anything non-debian??

http://www.crux.nu/

=)


Last edited by win32sux; 05-03-2005 at 08:10 PM.
 
Old 05-03-2005, 09:45 PM   #6
flying-tuxman
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Italy-Mexico
Distribution: Archlinux, Slackware, Slax, DSL, Knoppix-mib
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
well,
I run debian as my main distro on a pentium II box and a pentium IV laptop.
on both computers I have a "testing" partition devoted to new distros (redhat, vectorlinux, yoper, vuidalinux is downloading at the moment for a nightime prime)
on the P-II nothing really runs better than debian.
on the P-IV yoper runs very well, yet is KDE all the way and Im a fluxbox guy.
configuring all fluxbox start scripts its quite a job.
I know there are alternatives out there but debian and apt-get ease of use and stability kinda spoiled me.
if its not out there already, a debian-based core distro with a good installer and optimized for i686 would be really cool.

thanks

sailor
 
Old 05-04-2005, 08:02 AM   #7
macondo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,016

Rep: Reputation: 49
I guess i'm confused. I must not have understood your post correctly. I thought you wanted an easy installation of a Debian based distro, optimized for a processor-type 686 with only Fluxbox.

I run a PII, with Sarge, with the kernel 2.4.27-2-686 and IceWM. Something similar to what I thought you wanted, with the exception of the window manager.

In the article i sent you, you do a mininal install, the installation gives you a 2.4 or 2.6-386 kernel-image by default. Once the base system is installed, you install Fluxbox (this will be the only wm), and install the kernel-image- 686 (2.4 or 2.6), this should take 5 minutes, reboot and when you come back, delete the 386 kernel with 'debfoster' .

This will give you a lean, fast, distro with only the apps, kernel, and window manager you want. Apt-get is simple, no brain surgery, no compilation of the kernel.

OTOH, if you want a Debian clone that installs a 686 kernel by default, and doesn't come with KDE/Gnome by default, i haven't seen one. But who knows, maybe distrowatch.com has one in its database.

regards,

Last edited by macondo; 05-04-2005 at 08:12 AM.
 
Old 05-04-2005, 10:04 AM   #8
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
Quote:
Originally posted by macondo
if you want a Debian clone that installs a 686 kernel by default, and doesn't come with KDE/Gnome by default, i haven't seen one. But who knows, maybe distrowatch.com has one in its database.
it's not that he wants one that installs an i686 kernel by default... he wants a debian-based distro where all the packages are i686... that's not the same thing as having only an i686 kernel... get it??
 
Old 05-04-2005, 10:22 AM   #9
macondo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,016

Rep: Reputation: 49
Gotcha! finally.
 
Old 05-04-2005, 11:19 AM   #10
Dead Parrot
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
Posts: 1,597

Rep: Reputation: 46
Do a Google search for apt-build. I haven't tried it myself, but people say that apt-build can enhance your whole Debian installation to become i686 optimized (if that's what you want). Having run some i686 optimized distros and BSD's, I don't see any noticeable advantage in such optimizations. If it's extra speed you want, optimizing the kernel seems to be the only optimization that's really worth the effort, IMO.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 03:09 AM   #11
flying-tuxman
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Italy-Mexico
Distribution: Archlinux, Slackware, Slax, DSL, Knoppix-mib
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
apt-build is an interesting option albeit I havent tried it myself yet.
together with the i686 kernel should make a very fine combination.
as far as the real utility of optimization, running some highly optimized distros as gentoo and yoper on the same P4 box with debian the difference is noticeable, expecially on some applications under kde, but no dramatically faster.
now, I dont see the point of going the whole nine yards in order to optimize a distro for speed and then use kde or gnome instead of fluxbox, the faster window manager out there.
I seems odd to me than among a zillion of debian-dased distros there isnt one which packs the features I referred to.

sailor
 
Old 05-05-2005, 06:41 AM   #12
m_yates
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Upstate
Distribution: Debian, Mint, Mythbuntu
Posts: 1,176

Rep: Reputation: 54
Has anyone actually tested the speed difference between an i386 distro and a i686 distro? People often say this is "fast" because it is optimized for a certain processor. However, in my experience, I find no difference between say a 686 kernel or a 386 kernel, or mplayer-686 versus mplayer-386. Is it microseconds of speed difference we are referring to? If so, you will never be able to re-coup the time spent compiling "optimized" packages.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 02:42 PM   #13
flying-tuxman
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Italy-Mexico
Distribution: Archlinux, Slackware, Slax, DSL, Knoppix-mib
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
it would be very interesting if someone run this kind of test including a few popular packages optimized or compiled for each processor.
as far as I understand though, optimized distros include in their packages a few speed enhancing tricks like slicing down the packages to the bare minimunm and prelinking.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 05:38 PM   #14
ironwalker
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: 1st hop-NYC/NewJersey shore,north....2nd hop-upstate....3rd hop-texas...4th hop-southdakota(sturgis)...5th hop-san diego.....6th hop-atlantic ocean! Final hop-resting in dreamland dreamwalking and meeting new people from past lives...gd' night.
Distribution: Siduction, the only way to do Debian Unstable
Posts: 506

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Kanotix is i686 distro.
 
Old 05-05-2005, 05:41 PM   #15
timothykaine
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Ursa, Debian, Kanotix
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by ironwalker
Kanotix is i686 distro.
No its not.

Kanotix is an i386 distro with an i586 kernel, like most recent distros.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ArchLinux is optimized for i686... pppaaarrrkkk Linux - Newbie 3 06-30-2005 02:09 PM
What makes it i686 optimized ? kriton12 Slackware 15 03-21-2005 04:07 AM
Debian based i686 distro VertX Debian 6 02-27-2005 07:11 AM
Fedora or other distro optimized for i686 or athlon-xp Apollo77 Linux - Distributions 2 05-25-2004 03:16 PM
Shell Based Distro Wanted Android_808 Linux - Distributions 1 04-23-2004 03:44 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration