DebianThis forum is for the discussion of Debian Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
So I am settled on Debian (Sid) as my main Linux Distro. One issue I am having, though, is finding a good DE.
KDE - Aesthetically nice, but too bloated.
Gnome 3 - Interesting idea and I'm excited to see where its going to go, but not ready for everyday use.
XFCE - Lean and fast DE, but ugly as heck. Tried theming but its difficult and I am by no means a designer. Looks isn't everything, but coding in an ugly environment distracts me.
Any other suggestions to check out? Basically, I'm looking for a DE that looks somewhat nice, while being lean. I also like where opening downloaded files from Chrome "just works." An example of that is when I tried fluxbox, I would have to open a terminal and manually open the file from there. I like when KDE/Gnome knows automatically how to open the file directly from the browser.
XFCE - Lean and fast DE, but ugly as heck. Tried theming but its difficult and I am by no means a designer. Looks isn't everything, but coding in an ugly environment distracts me.
I'm a little baffled by this remark. With a little work xfce can be made to look identical to a gnome 2.3 system, without the gnome bloat. Granted, the GUI tools for doing so aren't there, but it's not what I would call difficult, just a little harder.
XFCE is good, but there's a weird thing with XFCE 4.8 where if you use Compiz Fusion, you can't change the window decoration (maybe it was just me). That said, it runs very well.
I have to disagree with the OP - Gnome 3.2 is ready for everyday use, as I use it every day and it's not let me down yet.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
I use Gnome 3.2 as my workhorse and love it. I also use LXDE, XFCE, E17 (have used E16), Fluxbox, and MATE. I haven't found any of these to be difficult to use.
I dislike KDE but that's just me, I'm sure it is a good DE but it's just not to my liking.
I guess I'm just picky. I'm experimenting with Openbox right now and it seems to work pretty good.
I tried theming XFCE but I found it difficult because panels and windows were themed differently. Maybe I just haven't found the right themes yet.
As far as Gnome 3.2, I do like it, but I find it annoying having to open the shell to do anything. I would just prefer to have the quick list of apps on the left side of the desktop so I don't have to open the activities first. Obviously its not a huge deal, its only the flick of the mouse or an extra press of the keyboard, but it's those little things that make or break it for me. I'm trying to escape from the Windows world, not transfer to another just like it.
If you like desktop icons and a little eye candy, I suggest staying with XFCE. Although some things cannot be changed, such as the background colour of the file manager, window appearance can be tweeked quite nicely. Adding shadows to the windows gives them a three-dimensional look, especially pop-up boxes.
If you care more for function than form, I suggest continuing to experiment with Openbox. Provided one has enough knowledge, which I do not, literally anything can be done with it. I have created two themes that look better than anything I have seen on bloated, full-fledged DEs.
So far OpenBox has been very cool to play with. I plan to keep experimenting with it and hopefully will get it the way I like. Thanks for all the help!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.