2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
StarOffice isn't awful, but I threw it on the one bloated Windows box we have left and it's decided to take over the world. MS Office is still on there, but unless you specifically open it first, any document you attempt to open goes to SO as a default and there's no way to change it. It's also changed the icons for every old Windows doc to the SO icon whether or not the doc's ever been opened in SO. OpenOffice definitely gets my vote. It's not Borg-ish like Star (is SO competeing with MS by attempting to out-Borg them?). At least by the time we got Linux loaded up on this computer, I had enough knowledge to not let SO touch this one with a 40-foot pole.
OpenOffice.org.
I don't think that with an up-to-date computer the size of a program really matters, nor the resources it takes as there should be plenty. OO.o just has anything someone who's migrating from MS needs. (Including the functionality of opening their files and saving into that fileformat)
as for as my concern i have used openoffice.org it is comparitvely more user frieldly for a new user then MS office,but in performance it is slow
thanx
I have Ubuntu at home, and XP at work, but in both places use OOo. It's sometimes slower, the 2.0. beta halts, but recover nicely. I had for 5 years MS Office, and moving from MS Office to OOo was quite easy, and handy, not only that resemble the windows and commands, but also because it's FREEEEEEE, and most of all, exports everything in Adobe, so now, I have friends who call me for making .pdf files, thinking that I have it. It's impossible not to recognize the superiority of MS, but think about something: maybe 100.000 peoples are working to improve something, which may became the new standard, like .odt, .ods.... Maybe, in future will have .odt from MS.
I really like GNOME office, it's fast and wonderful, however, for my needs which include M$ compatability and multiple languages support OO2 is usually better.
However, since we are at the Linux world, I am a Newbie & the Linux S-ware is free, I would go for Open Office Org (I have not tried any other yet...).
Note:
One of My most NEEDED features is to be able to drag&drop files from:
MS Office < - > Open Office Org
... unfortunately, most of the world is still using Windows & most of the world's files were created in the MS Office program...
... so we need to be able to work with those files...
At the same time, I believe there is lots of improvement in Open Office Org...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.