2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
|
View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
|
|
Gnome
|
  
|
491 |
30.92% |
|
KDE
|
  
|
925 |
58.25% |
|
GNUstep
|
  
|
17 |
1.07% |
|
XFCE
|
  
|
154 |
9.70% |
|
Ximian
|
  
|
1 |
0.06% |
01-11-2005, 10:11 PM
|
#106
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Distribution: Debian, Gentoo, OpenBSD, Slackware
Posts: 32
Rep:
|
KDE can be somewhat bloated, though you thankfully can ditch most of the crap. My biggest complaint is the graphical design. First off, the default theme is utter crap. For that matter I've yet to find a theme that I really like.
Secondly, I think that most qt programs have poor layouts. For an example, I personally like having text instead of just icons. With something like kwrite I don't like having icons for the save buttons and such. But, wait, you could add text along with, or replacing the icons when you configure the bar. The only problem is the text is so verbose that you'd need to maximize the application to be able to see all the commands.
In the end window managers are what I always go back to. I do like some of the ideas that *STEP has. Now only if they developed at a reasonable pace...
|
|
|
|
01-12-2005, 12:36 AM
|
#107
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Rep: 
|
I have 512 MB RAM. You don't need 1 GB RAM people to have KDE! 
|
|
|
|
01-12-2005, 03:26 AM
|
#108
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Long Island, NY USA
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, Ubuntu Hoary
Posts: 53
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Harishankar
I have 512 MB RAM. You don't need 1 GB RAM people to have KDE!
|
==============================
And you don't need 512MB to run something like xfce4 as your DE. And many wm are so competent its no wonder so many folks don't bother with a DE at all. BUT....., it's all about choice ;-)
|
|
|
|
01-12-2005, 04:21 AM
|
#109
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,142
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ratpoison
==============================
And you don't need 512MB to run something like xfce4 as your DE. And many wm are so competent its no wonder so many folks don't bother with a DE at all. BUT....., it's all about choice ;-)
|
There is a separate category for WMs anyway.
|
|
|
|
01-12-2005, 04:43 AM
|
#110
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Tampere, Finland
Distribution: Debian, Familiar, OS X
Posts: 145
Rep:
|
i have only tried kde and gnome, so i choose from them: gnome. itīs quite similar in philosophy to os x, simple and pretty.
|
|
|
|
01-12-2005, 04:48 AM
|
#111
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: NB,Canada
Distribution: Something alpha or beta, binary or source...
Posts: 2,280
Rep:
|
I've been biting down on it with the memory usage of KDE. I don't know where people get their information, but when I run KDE with eye candy on (on my Duron 800, no powerhouse), it uses about 80mb of RAM. I have 384 mb in my system and it alsmost never uses my itty bitty 256mb swap partition. I have to have quite a few apps open before it consumes enough to do that (which is why I made such a small partition for swap). I don'tknow if this is a source vs binary thing or not, but that's one reason why I continue to use KDE over XFCE4 (which I'd get off my butt and configure if KDE let me down).
|
|
|
|
01-12-2005, 05:00 AM
|
#112
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 46
Rep:
|
kde when i want to use Kate, ude when i don't.
|
|
|
|
01-12-2005, 05:29 AM
|
#113
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Gorredijk, Netherlands
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 400
Rep:
|
Important points for me:
KDE
Fast, customizable.
Webbrowser == File Manager -> Bad Idea, and the fact that changing the default browser is difficult makes this a big dejavu
Konqueror configuration screen -> Yikes. Divide File Manager settings and Browser settings please.
GTK Apps (Firefox, Gaim, Azureus) -> Look horrible and run slow, even with gtkqt-engine whatever (nice attempt but still).
Toolbar configuration (especially in Konqueror) is very clunky. The fact that you can remove items from the bar that can't be put back is very bad.
Lots off I apps I don't need and want
Gnome
Clean look and feel
Auto mount is sweet when it works
GConf -> Big mistake. Where have we seen it before?
Lack of options/preferences -> On purpose but it sucks
Slow... -> the smooth gtk theming engine makes it faster but I couldn't find a decent theme for it
No good dvd/cd burner software.
XFCE4
Clean look and fast
No unnecessary features but also lacks some useful ones.
File manager sucks but can be replaced with Rox-filer pretty good
Customizable menus and I love the desktop right click menu
So KDE is unusable for me. I usually bounce between Gnome and XFCE. I voted XFCE because the new 4.2 has lots of improvement.
Last edited by Haiyadragon; 01-12-2005 at 05:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
01-13-2005, 10:53 AM
|
#114
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 307
Rep:
|
GNOME .... almost voted for XFCE though.
|
|
|
|
01-13-2005, 10:46 PM
|
#115
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2004
Posts: 27
Rep:
|
gnome is the best ........ keyboard shortcuts are cool....
|
|
|
|
01-14-2005, 10:07 AM
|
#116
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Distribution: Mandriva 2007
Posts: 94
Rep:
|
I love KDE
Jeremy
|
|
|
|
01-14-2005, 11:24 AM
|
#117
|
|
Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
I don't know why people complain that KDE is bloated, you are not forced to install all the packages that come with KDE, you can choose individual packages (if your distro permits it, coz I know Slack installs all packages in a group) making your KDE installation very customised. As for memory usage when my main PC was on the blinkers due to a RAM problem, I managed to run KDE on 128 megs of pc2100 ddr ram on an Athlon XP 2000 machine. It was a bit sluggish, coz I usually have a lot of apps running at the same time, but it still worked fine. Frankly I don't see much difference in speed when I am running GNOME or KDE on the same machine, however when I run fluxbox or XFCE, then I notice a difference.
|
|
|
|
01-14-2005, 11:34 AM
|
#118
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu 4.10
Posts: 30
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by OSourceDiplomat
Gnome 2.8 in Ubuntu is so sweet. I'll admit that XFCE has come along way, though.
|
Yup !!! 
|
|
|
|
01-14-2005, 10:59 PM
|
#119
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina
Distribution: Linspire, Mepis, Kanotix, PCLinuxOS
Posts: 6
Rep:
|
I like KDE the best...Its more "Windows" like...
Gnome is good also...Its kinds reminds me of a Mac!
XFCE...I never really used it..but i will give it a try.
|
|
|
|
01-15-2005, 05:02 PM
|
#120
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: RedHat Linux 9
Posts: 14
Rep:
|
Gnome for ever.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|