2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice AwardsThis forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Desktop Environment of the Year
KDE gets its power by being well designed, modular, flexible, and extremely well integrated. Gnome gets its functionality by writing down UI standards, enforcing them, and dumping stuff that does not follow them. The end result is that Gnome is less functional than it was two years ago; KDE is 10x more functional.
Heck, most of the time when people talk about the things they like about Gnome they are not even talking about Gnome. OpenOffice.org... not a Gnome app; Firefox.. not a Gnome app; Evolution wasn't even an official Gnome app until this last stable release (2.8). Even XFCE has been making more headway than Gnome.
KDE is so flexible:themes,kb shortcuts,icons and smooth(this is why i have downloaded qt-gtk theme so the GNOME(gtk) apps to look just as my kde ones)
BAGHIRA THEME
Originally posted by zvonSully KDE is so flexible:themes,kb shortcuts,icons and smooth(this is why i have downloaded qt-gtk theme so the GNOME(gtk) apps to look just as my kde ones)
BAGHIRA THEME
I vote KDE. I used GNOME for a while, and enjoyed its simplicity, but to my mind KDE is more functional and can be configured to be elegant like GNOME.
Originally posted by Haiyadragon Nothing Gnome doesn't have.
You don't really want to start comparing apples to apples between Gnome and KDE, do you? I can accept the argument of simplicity as an overall design goal; but if you plan of trying to compare the two in terms of feature set, you are going to be sorely disappointed.
Originally posted by s1ider You don't really want to start comparing apples to apples between Gnome and KDE, do you? I can accept the argument of simplicity as an overall design goal; but if you plan of trying to compare the two in terms of feature set, you are going to be sorely disappointed.
I know. I just hate the fact that my favorite apps use the gtk toolkit. I guess that's my only real reason to use Gnome. But I'm working on that (on the switch to KDE).
kde is powerful in terms of the number of Kapps it have, but looks messy, buggy, and overstuffed to me. gnome is more elegant, internally consistent and well organized, but lacking of some important functionality. basically you just cannot have a divine girl with enough iq. i guess kde guys are not good at arts and HCI, but good at programming whereas gnome guys are on the contrary.
at present i vote for xfce4, but expecting gnome guys could make apps faster and better.
Originally posted by staul kde is powerful in terms of the number of Kapps it have, but looks messy, buggy, and overstuffed to me. gnome is more elegant, internally consistent and well organized, but lacking of some important functionality. basically you just cannot have a divine girl with enough iq. i guess kde guys are not good at arts and HCI, but good at programming whereas gnome guys are on the contrary.
at present i vote for xfce4, but expecting gnome guys could make apps faster and better.
Gnome looks better to me but they took some really bad turns. GConf for example is something I cannot live with long term. I wonder if there's someone around that can really appreciate that simplicity crap. Seeing that the newcomers mostly use KDE and all. And the GUI speed is uncomparable. Gnome is sooo slow. Even on Ubuntu, with the spiffiest Gnome ever, it's slower then KDE. I run slack and I really want to like Dropline but it's to slow and "unpolished" to use.
I only wish that KDE folk would seperate Konqueror File manager and Konqueror Webbrowser more. So I can have a fully single screen webbrowser without external webpage calls ending up in my file manager window.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.