LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-21-2006, 11:09 AM   #1
paddy
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Suedpfalz
Distribution: kubuntu
Posts: 114

Rep: Reputation: 15
partition size


I'm afraid I might not be the first person to ask. I'd like to know what partition table you would recommend for a 40G harddrive (notebook). On my home system I currently have
2G swap (1G should be enough)
/ 10G (!)
/home rest

my main question is how big should the / partition be. I only use 2G out of 10. and as I'll mainly be doing word and image processing and some internet stuff, no games, I suppose 5G should be sufficient. or is that cutting my own throat?
also, is there anything notebook-specific I should know?

help appreciated. thanks, pat
 
Old 03-21-2006, 11:09 AM   #2
paddy
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Suedpfalz
Distribution: kubuntu
Posts: 114

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
btw, I want to install kubuntu
 
Old 03-21-2006, 11:42 AM   #3
Dragineez
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Annapolis
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 41
Keep It Simple Stupid

It's a surprizingly effective philosophy. If you intend to use the entire drive for your install, then I see no reason to have / and /home in separate partitions. I'm sure there will be many purists who will argue the point, but I honestly don't see the logic in your case.

/boot 50mb
/swap 500mb (depending on RAM)
/ everything else

Use LVM, that way you can shrink the partition later if you feel you need to.
 
Old 03-21-2006, 02:16 PM   #4
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 17,809

Rep: Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743Reputation: 743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragineez
It's a surprizingly effective philosophy. If you intend to use the entire drive for your install, then I see no reason to have / and /home in separate partitions. I'm sure there will be many purists who will argue the point, but I honestly don't see the logic in your case.

/boot 50mb
/swap 500mb (depending on RAM)
/ everything else

Use LVM, that way you can shrink the partition later if you feel you need to.
Concur....
In fact, you don't even need the separate partition for /boot.
KISS---don't create complexity unless to solve a problem.
 
Old 03-21-2006, 02:40 PM   #5
Dragineez
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Annapolis
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 41
Doh!

Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany
In fact, you don't even need the separate partition for /boot.
DOH! You're right - having a bit of a blonde moment.
 
Old 03-21-2006, 04:11 PM   #6
paddy
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Suedpfalz
Distribution: kubuntu
Posts: 114

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
fine. didn't even think of creating an extra boot partition. but why wouldn't I want an extra system partition? don't you think I might want to install a different distro or something at some point or something? or is that too much windows mentality?
thanks anyway
 
Old 03-21-2006, 05:15 PM   #7
mikejac69
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Lyon, France
Posts: 53

Rep: Reputation: 15
Just to add my two (€) , I would always advise having a seperate /home partition simply as I have Borked things a few times too many and it is great to have all my files sage and sound, and know I can re-format / without losing anything! Also I keep all my config files in /home so I can just copy them back over straight away. Must get around to writing a script to do that for me, but not killed system in months now...

As for Root, I have Edubuntu installed on my schools computers and they only have 6 Go Hdds so yes, 5 Go / space would be fine in my opinion, if you change your mind with games and stuff, mine mostly install under /home anyway!

Last edited by mikejac69; 03-21-2006 at 05:17 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Size in superblock is different from the physical size of the partition cyberfishee Linux - Hardware 18 09-11-2016 08:48 AM
Added second harddrive as a partition, but now the partition size is wrong.. mlsbraves Linux - General 5 08-17-2005 08:10 PM
file system size larger than fysical size:superblock or partition table corrupt klizon Linux - General 0 06-18-2004 04:18 PM
Total partition size - User partition size is not equals to Free partition size navaneethanj Linux - General 5 06-14-2004 12:55 PM
fdisk partition size differs from mounted partition size jimieee Linux - General 3 10-15-2003 03:10 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration