Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Okay it is no secret that Linux has not been able to crack the desktop, either at the home or at the workplace. Not to ignored either is that Windows lost some desktops last year (a little over 3%),but let’s not panic just yet, Windows still owns over 88% of all the desktops according to leading research. Many people might be surprised to learn that I come from a background of Windows, Linux, UNIX and even MAC. In fact, my first IT experience was in a Novell/SCO UNIX environment. Now there are some fundamental issues to why Windows 7 will trump Linux distros like Ubuntu, Fedora and Debian. Therefor, to get those out of the way let’s just spell them out.
[Here's my submission for FUD-of-the-week. It's just too funny. I dare you to top that! -- Sander]
Why do all those arguments (in the actual text) sound just the same as always? Games? MP3? Support? Open source software? What desktop GNU/Linux operating system doesn't give you those? Oh well, I guess the "leading research" took two cases, Windows 7 ad and the worst desktop GNU/Linux OS they could find..
Watching some (video) reviews of Windows 7 doesn't give the same picture. So either the development versions aren't the same that "leading research" uses or there's a lot of ad-money going on behind the scenes.. The PowerShell, which has been available since XP already, did sound good at start, but after three and half months at least the first versions of it were horrible to use, especially compared to the simpleness of bash. And how do all the external programs cope with objects that PowerShell uses (did they ever think some people might use non-PowerShell programs too to achieve something)?
Sounds like an ad to me, not a Linux crusher. But luckily they still got time to get there; if they actually managed to make it that good, it would simply mean other operating systems would soon be better and we all had great time..
To me the article seem sarcastic in a way ... or could it be that it wasn't ? Do they really believe this s**t that they're spouting ? It's hard for me to tell. It's funny actually, I think.
So is it being sarcastic, I want to know, seriously.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.