LXer: MXLinux is the most downloaded Linux desktop distribution, and now I know why
Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,493
Rep:
Whilst I don't use it much myself, I have been recommending it for many months/years(?); a far better fit for most newcomers than the *buntus & their clones.
I've been "playing" with it since MX18. I must say that it is more than user friendly. It's ridiculous easy to install and encrypt.
It uses the real Debian (Buster) repositories, but extended with MX repositories. The added MX feature I like best (and use often) is the snapshotting (to installable ISO). Brilliant!
I still use it on an old laptop (KDE Plasma version).
I have one major concern: the upgrade path. MX18 --> MX19 required a reinstall. Upgrade was explicitly mentioned as impossible. So what about next upgrade...?
I played with MX19 with sid (unstable) repositories. It's possible, but it breaks a lot and requires a lot of correction. Some of the MX utilities end up broken. Was fun to try though...
I agree with fatmac that it's much better than all the *buntus and their derivates.
So, thumbs up for MX
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,493
Rep:
Normally, it is just the usual upgrade procedure, but I believe there were major software differences between those two versions, & as you found out, it was easier to re install the O/S, which is easy enough, & you can re use your old /home directories, just enable that option when re installing.
Nice! How did you achieve it? I'm guessing apt somehow. I have it running on a laptop, but it's needs are few. I will probably switch it to FreeBSD soon, however.
Flatpak. Guys claim it works. But it didn't. IMO too many functions out of box - and not good enough tested. Not good enough because there are too many of them.
Flatpak. Guys claim it works. But it didn't. IMO too many functions out of box - and not good enough tested. Not good enough because there are too many of them.
Ah, good to know. I don't use them, as I have been skeptical, myself.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.