LXer: Millions of Android users 'deceived' by flashlight app that shares location with advertisers
Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
LXer: Millions of Android users 'deceived' by flashlight app that shares location with advertisers
Published at LXer:
Brightest Flashlight Free, available in the Google Play store, has been downloaded over 50 million times, but a complaint from the FTC reveals that the seemingly innocent app transmits “precise location” data to third-party advertisers alongside a unique device identifier.
EVERY application asks for every permission under the sun. Why doesn't google stop this? Pffsst nsa, what about google and the cell phone carriers and crooks?
This is one reason I don't load up my phone with lots of apps and why I always read the permission requests.
If in doubt, I leave it out until I can learn more about it.
I also keep my GPS turned off unless I want to use it, as when I take a bike ride and want to track it with Move! Bike Computer, which appears to be quite well-behaved, then I turn it off when I'm done.
(I took a lot at one bike tracking app that wanted access to my contacts, for Pete's sake! There could have been no honorable reason for that.)
Every application that installed so far on my phone has told me specifically which rights it needs on the phone before the actual installation. If I see a flashlight application that wants to have rights that aren't needed by this type of application I won't install it.
Simple as that, why does it seem that common sense is deactivated by so many people once they touch their phone?
I don't blame Google for that and I do not blame the developers (they could have done a better job, though).
I do blame the users for installing an app that needs rights that are in no way related to its functions. People, start using your brain!
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
I blame Google completely for this kind of thing. There is no earthly reason not to let a user decide what permissions an application has at install time or even run time. Just giving the options "allow access to all my personal data" or "don't install" is silly and is conditioning users into saying "yes" to everything.
It's one of the reasons why I am in two minds whether to bother with Android when I next buy a phone -- my old Symbian device seems perfectly able to give this kind of functionality so it makes me think Google want developers to do this.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.