LXer: Linus Torvalds Calls NVIDIA The Worst Company Ever
Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
LXer: Linus Torvalds Calls NVIDIA The Worst Company Ever
Published at LXer:
Linus Torvalds, the creator of the Linux kernel, has called out NVIDIA for their poor graphics drivers in a public presentation. In the talk he called NVIDIA "the single worst company we have ever dealt with" and ended his green comments with "NVIDIA: F*** YOU!"..
A bit of point missing going on here I feel. Firstly, as pointed out, Linus' issue isn't with end user experience where the end user doesn't mind about binary blobs. His issue is how Nvidia's lack of co-operation directly impacts the kernel and X.org development.
Also, the whole 2% market share thing is yet again a red herring. Don't think that just because we're mainly talking about GPUs that we're only talking about home desktop. How about this?
Given that, I think it's worth keeping the pressure up on Nvidia as much as we can as a community and as individuals. (For me, their facebook page seemed a good place to start.)
His issue is how Nvidia's lack of co-operation directly impacts the kernel and X.org development.
If the kernel and X.org devs didn't break the API with every new version it wouldn't be a problem. Same thing happens with AMD/ATI, new Xorg or kernel come out and poof fglrx doesn't work. And who gets blamed? Not the kernel or Xorg devs but AMD.
Even using the 'free' radeon driver I lost X for half the day when this last version of Xorg hit Debian sid. The fix? For some strange reason I had to install xserver-xorg-video-ati even though xserver-xorg-video-radeon had been working for the past two years with no problems.
OH look X broke let's blame nvidia/amd/intel etc.
Anyone that has been running Linux for a number of years will understand what I am talking about.
If the kernel and X.org devs didn't break the API with every new version it wouldn't be a problem. Same thing happens with AMD/ATI, new Xorg or kernel come out and poof fglrx doesn't work. And who gets blamed? Not the kernel or Xorg devs but AMD.
Even using the 'free' radeon driver I lost X for half the day when this last version of Xorg hit Debian sid. The fix? For some strange reason I had to install xserver-xorg-video-ati even though xserver-xorg-video-radeon had been working for the past two years with no problems.
OH look X broke let's blame nvidia/amd/intel etc.
Anyone that has been running Linux for a number of years will understand what I am talking about.
Perhaps, however nobody is forcing you to run the latest bleeding edge version of the kernel or Xorg.
I'm running Slackware 13.1 with kernel 2.6.33.x (2 years old...) and don't have any complaints, and will make sure that my target upgrade will work with the fglrx drivers *before* upgrading my distro (if I upgrade at all).
Part of the problem you describe has to do with this never ending upgrade treadmill some users seem to be on, and for no reason at all really (understandable if you're using a rolling realease distro like Arch, though).
EDIT: many distros (such as Debian *cough*) mess around with the packages they make, a lot more than they probably should. Distros like Slackware give you the software the upstream developers intended you to have.
I've experienced a lot fewer problems that turn out to be distro-specific since I started using Slackware. I don't want to start a distro war here, just pointing out my own observations...
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.