Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It's easy for people to pick at Windows for being prone to virus and malware attacks. It's almost a given belief that if you're running a PC with a Windows operating system, you're much more susceptible to attacks than users with other operating systems. But let's quickly look at the reasons for this. First, it isn't really Microsoft's fault. It isn't that Windows is technically inferior, it's that the majority of the world runs on Windows. This fact alone is very attractive for any virus coder or exploiter. As a virus writer, you'd want to attack the majority, not the minority.
Linux is virus free (as I am aware), not virus proof. The reason there are no circulating Linux viruses is because when one is found, it is usually copied to a disk and examined by hackers that work on Linux in that area. So within a couple of days, they would have a fix out and no one is able to be effected by it anymore. That is why it is virus free (as we know, but could be wrong). Unlike with windows, any viruses (that aren't paid off by virus scanner companies) are never quarantined by windows and they don't have the good track record of reverse engineering the viruses as the Linux/ FOSS communities do.
It's not invincible people, just protected by a shield that is strong than windows' shield.
Last edited by texasone; 02-21-2009 at 12:04 PM.
Reason: spelling error
I had difficulties accessing the linked-to article, which is useless anyway… Here's a link to the real interesting article: http://www.geekzone.co.nz/foobar/6229
Don't be your usual Linux zealot. What this person explains is real, is simple, and both the risk and the cure are so obvious I just can't believe that nothing has been done to date!
Yes this is true. But you're not the kind of user who'll get the virus.
The problem is that 99% of new users (think netbooks, Dell, Ubuntu…) will be clueless and use Gnome or KDE. And there's nothing wrong with that: those are familiar environments, where most things can easily be found and most tasks can easily be done. They could get the virus!
Ahh, well, ok then, I have to agree. Users who have no clue what they are doing or using or anything (much less know anything related to security) ... yes they will be the first to get a virus.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.