LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE
User Name
Password
SUSE / openSUSE This Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-17-2006, 06:01 AM   #31
Weedman
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15

the next suse version better be better than the original 10.0.

it fully sucked. and didnt work very well (if at all) on my pcs.

imho, it fully sucks!

it better be better!
-weed
 
Old 02-17-2006, 06:05 AM   #32
onjoo
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Suse 10, Suse-factory , RHEL4, SLES9, SLED10
Posts: 380

Rep: Reputation: 30
UPDATE :

Announcement of Beta4 is planned for saturday afternoon (UTC).
 
Old 02-17-2006, 06:28 AM   #33
RedShirt
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Distribution: Sabayon 3.5Loop2
Posts: 1,150

Rep: Reputation: 45
That is a really odd release time... I don't get it. I assumet his is from a mailing list, did they give details about why or an approximate time?
 
Old 02-20-2006, 04:54 AM   #34
TigerLinux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04
Posts: 1,731

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Alpha 4 was released, but unstable, i think at least need RC1 to get a better try.
 
Old 02-20-2006, 04:58 AM   #35
reddazz
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLinux
Alpha 4 was released, but unstable, i think at least need RC1 to get a better try.
Did you mean beta4?
 
Old 02-20-2006, 06:05 AM   #36
TigerLinux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04
Posts: 1,731

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
sorry, beta 4.
 
Old 02-20-2006, 11:35 AM   #37
RedShirt
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Distribution: Sabayon 3.5Loop2
Posts: 1,150

Rep: Reputation: 45
Wow... beta 4 sucks pretty bad. 10 attempts of various kinds to install. Not one made it in past drive format...where they all failed, no matter which settings I used. Beta 4 is more like... I dunno, worthless development build pre-alpha. Though it could be 64bit on SATA only. But it is far from a late beta.
 
Old 02-20-2006, 11:42 AM   #38
TigerLinux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04
Posts: 1,731

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Wait for final release, 10.0 is good enough.
I upgraded my notebook to 80 GB HDD, i will install Suse 10.0 this week.
 
Old 02-20-2006, 11:53 AM   #39
onjoo
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Suse 10, Suse-factory , RHEL4, SLES9, SLED10
Posts: 380

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedShirt
Wow... beta 4 sucks pretty bad. 10 attempts of various kinds to install. Not one made it in past drive format...where they all failed, no matter which settings I used. Beta 4 is more like... I dunno, worthless development build pre-alpha. Though it could be 64bit on SATA only. But it is far from a late beta.
Maybe you now understand what I was trying to say.

It still sounds weird to implement new stuff at the end of test period. Development releases are development releases, but this little thing is something else. Its quite hard to start real testing, if you can't even install it on hd.

BTW, because of the major bugs, another extra beta has been added to the roadmap and an entry for RC has been removed.
 
Old 02-20-2006, 04:39 PM   #40
RedShirt
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Distribution: Sabayon 3.5Loop2
Posts: 1,150

Rep: Reputation: 45
Well that pushes this fairly squarely into April now, then doesn't it? At least given all likelihood.

And I know what you meant, I didn't know the installer they were talking about was this one, I thought for sure they would leave the install disc one alone, and just upgrade YAST. Apparently not. Very odd stage to go this far. And there there is the xgl and compiz, which I hear is actually quite stable, aside from not currently working with ATI and Matrox cards... Ho...boy.

Not that I feel upgrades shouldn't be done, but... most of this should never have come out of internal testing at this stage. They really should drop the installer for now and just release it with 10.2 in like September/November, after proper development and testing.
 
Old 02-20-2006, 06:27 PM   #41
TigerLinux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04
Posts: 1,731

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
can we upgrade the 10.0 to the newer kernel, KDE etc., as used by 10.1 ?
using YAST?
 
Old 02-20-2006, 07:04 PM   #42
RedShirt
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Distribution: Sabayon 3.5Loop2
Posts: 1,150

Rep: Reputation: 45
No, not exactly. Quite simply, you can get a KOTD, or compile your own kernel, as usual. The version for 10.1 is probably a KOTD from a few days ago.
 
Old 02-21-2006, 01:24 AM   #43
onjoo
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Suse 10, Suse-factory , RHEL4, SLES9, SLED10
Posts: 380

Rep: Reputation: 30
I have no idea what will happen to KOTD in the future, but with suse 10.1. they have decided to drop all non-GPL kernel modules, so it isn't going to be a easy update.
 
Old 02-21-2006, 05:28 AM   #44
TigerLinux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04
Posts: 1,731

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I just installed my notebook with SUSE 10.0, works fine, very happy!
 
Old 02-21-2006, 05:58 AM   #45
onjoo
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Finland
Distribution: Suse 10, Suse-factory , RHEL4, SLES9, SLED10
Posts: 380

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLinux
I just installed my notebook with SUSE 10.0, works fine, very happy!
I have been using suse 10 on laptop and also on old PII as LAMP-server without problems.
It maybe isn't as fast as the competitors but it is very stable and everything has been working without any pain.

Recent Suse 10.1. beta4 on the other hand is something completely different.
After many big changes in last weeks, I will probably wait for summer before installing 10.1 or maybe even leave it alone and update with Suse 10.2. alphas.
 
  


Reply

Tags
suse



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suse 10.1 alpha 2 powerlifter450 SUSE / openSUSE 9 11-01-2005 11:25 AM
Suse 10.0 Alpha 1 (10.0.42) 1kyle SUSE / openSUSE 7 10-03-2005 10:08 AM
Open SUSE 10.0 Alpha 1 now available for download 1kyle SUSE / openSUSE 1 10-01-2005 01:22 PM
Install SuSE 8.1 on Alpha Server 5/500 schlandower Linux - General 0 10-24-2004 09:56 AM
SuSe 8.1 for Alpha mtbikerj Linux - Software 0 09-04-2003 07:35 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration