SUSE / openSUSE This Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
|
10-27-2005, 08:01 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: China
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 15
Rep:
|
Copy files from partition to partition too slow, SATA hard disk.What should I do£¿
I have 3 partitions in linux, all reiser format.
Copy small file is ok. Copy big files from partition to partiton, like 1.4G dvdrip movie :
It's about 11 MB/s at beginning , soon the speed slow down , the slowest speed is about 3.4 MB/s, most of time the copy speed is 5 Mb/s .
This speed is very slow. What should I do ?
My hard disk is 80G 7200rpm sata.
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 08:08 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199
Rep: 
|
Hello!
The slow speed results from copying from partition to partition on a single disk.
Greetings
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 08:12 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: China
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 15
Original Poster
Rep:
|
but much slower than do copy in windows.
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 08:15 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: China
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 15
Original Poster
Rep:
|
copy 1.4G in linux Suse10.0, about 3 mins.
in windows, less than 1:20.
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 08:40 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware-current 64bit
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
on SATA SuSE 9.3 (XFS) copying 3.4 GB on the same disk between two partitions took 2:50
It would depend on FS, controler (SIl is worse than nVidia), other disk intensive processes
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 11:13 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: China
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 15
Original Poster
Rep:
|
su
RLee:/home/lee # hdparm -Tt /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 2060 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1029.94 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 42 MB in 3.04 seconds = 13.81 MB/sec
how about yours?
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 12:29 PM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware-current 64bit
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 3508 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1753.39 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.00 seconds = 56.66 MB/sec
This is not really informative test
|
|
|
10-27-2005, 08:56 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: China
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 15
Original Poster
Rep:
|
.......................
oops...........
did you do some settings after you install suse?
|
|
|
10-28-2005, 08:53 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: China
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 15
Original Poster
Rep:
|
RLee:/home/lee # hdparm -d1 /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
HDIO_GET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
hmmmm.......somebody help me pls.........
|
|
|
10-28-2005, 08:59 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware-current 64bit
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
I have not changed anything specific.
I have Seagate 120MB (Hitachi worked as well until disk died) SATA connected to nvidia SATA controler (there are some problems with SIl because of design), XFS file system and option noatime set in fstab. Disk is divided into /, /boot, /home, and swap (obviously). There is a problem with your hardware I am afraid. Though it is possible that something happened with your SuSE installation. I have seen worse (and better results) than mine, but yours is "unhealthy". I would try some disk diagnostics.
|
|
|
10-28-2005, 09:01 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware-current 64bit
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
Quote:
hdparm -d1 /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
HDIO_GET_DMA failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
|
This is normal, benign error: SATA is not fully recognized as DMA capable. Forget about this error.
|
|
|
10-28-2005, 11:30 AM
|
#12
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: China
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 15
Original Poster
Rep:
|
my disk is healthy. I am quite sure.
|
|
|
10-28-2005, 11:56 AM
|
#13
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Norway
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS
Posts: 641
Rep:
|
Hi,
Have you tried playing with the other hdparm parameters to check if you have 32-bit access to the disk etc?
Make sure to check out your harddrives physical capabilities before changing the settings, as tweaking too much can lead to dataloss or worse!
As an example, I increased harddrive performance on my system by adding this to the startup-scripts : /usr/sbin/hdparm -c3 -m16 /dev/hda
-Y1
Last edited by Yalla-One; 10-28-2005 at 11:57 AM.
|
|
|
10-28-2005, 11:57 AM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware-current 64bit
Posts: 465
Rep:
|
DMA settings do not apply to SATA.
|
|
|
10-28-2005, 01:10 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Herzliyya, Israel
Distribution: SuSE 10.1; Testing Distros
Posts: 1,832
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ryanlee
my disk is healthy. I am quite sure.
|
Your disk is just fine. It depends on disk itself. I have ATA and S-ATA:
Code:
slackware:/home/slackerlx# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 1796 MB in 2.00 seconds = 896.34 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 158 MB in 3.02 seconds = 52.24 MB/sec
slackware:/home/slackerlx# hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1896 MB in 2.00 seconds = 948.14 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 166 MB in 3.01 seconds = 55.18 MB/sec
slackware:/home/slackerlx#
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|