LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE
User Name
Password
SUSE / openSUSE This Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2005, 09:21 AM   #1
sargon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
ATI Driver uninstall


I installed ATI's new (proprietary) driver over the weekend, and I have yet to get it to work properly (and I followed SuSE's instructions to the letter numerous times). I attempted to revert back to the Xorg drivers, but X refused to start.

I did this:

init 3

modprobe -r fglrx

modprobe radeonfb

I copied my backups of XF86Config to /etc/X11, and deleted the xorg.conf which ATI's driver needs.

Then rebooted.

ATI's proprietary driver still shows up.

What am I missing? How do I revert back to the original driver?

Thanks in advance.
 
Old 01-27-2005, 01:43 PM   #2
Haraldsh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian 2.6.9 Sarge
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
Have you looked in XF86Conf-4?
There should be a line in Device which sez fglrx, change it to ati, radeon or whatever the old driver was.
Notice; that you are not uinstalling the driver but telling X to use something else.
 
Old 01-27-2005, 01:58 PM   #3
sargon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
That was one of the first things I tried, since I made a backup of the XF86Configs before I installed the new driver. But it didn't work---screen was unreadable. I then ran modprobe -r fglrx and modprobe radeon and tried to start X again (with the original XF86Config), but the screen was still garbled.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 10:44 AM   #4
Haraldsh
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Distribution: Debian 2.6.9 Sarge
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
Try to remove the driver by using apt-get remove fglrx-driver.

I've now removed (with some help from a skilled Debian user) the fglrx driver.
It's too bad that ATI haven't released a general driver which is not a binary.
Even though I tried the ATI driver and made it work somehow, it made more trouble than it was worth.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 10:56 AM   #5
sargon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
I tried that, and still had problems (apt for SuSE rocks). I ended up re-installing SuSE, as I trashed the kernel attempting to get rid of all traces of ATI's driver.

I agree with you---the ATI driver is more trouble than it is worth. I tried (for four days) to get it to work, and it never did work properly.

Thanks.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 03:46 PM   #6
zhitch
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Distribution: LFS
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: 15
geez...its working fairly well for me..using Xorg 6.8.1 and an R300 ! had it up in 15 minutes..and that includes the download time and reboot time. You are using the Suse RPM and the Suse kernel module RPM right? if ya didn`t know they got it in supplimentary in the 9.2 dir. only bug I see is Sax2 doesn`t think its got 3D..but glxgears is about 2800 fps and fgl_glxgears is about 580 fps..and the Sax2 bug is in the readme so at least Suse is aware..oh did ya try removing the package from add/remove software in YAST?...you didn`t mention uninstalling the RPM...and that would be one of the first things I`d try if not already done

Last edited by zhitch; 01-31-2005 at 03:52 PM.
 
Old 01-31-2005, 03:57 PM   #7
sargon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Distribution: SuSE
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Yep. I downloaded and installed the day after they were posted. Never could get them to work, no matter what.

It could be that I have a laptop (RV350). All I know is that after an entire weekend of fighting it (two twelve-hour sessions) and two more days after work fighting it (two four-hour sessions), X still used the Mesa driver. I gave up. But X didn't work too well after removing the ATI driver, so I had to re-install the ATI driver and configure X to use the Xorg radeon driver instead of ATI's driver. X still did strange things, thus the battle trying to rid the system of all the ATI stuff.

Only after a complete re-install of SuSE is everything back to normal.

I won't try any ATI drivers in the future, at least on a laptop....
 
Old 01-31-2005, 04:02 PM   #8
zhitch
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Distribution: LFS
Posts: 28

Rep: Reputation: 15
I don`t blame ya there...sounds like more fun than getiing run over by a bus I`ll have to recommend to my freinds to stay away from the new one if they use a mobile chip
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ati driver a bit unstable but no different than nvidia..ati benchmark inside. spade Slackware 1 10-06-2004 12:13 AM
ATI driver: ATI 9600XT failed dependencies igmcdermott Linux - Software 2 08-06-2004 09:26 AM
ATI driver: ATI 9600XT failed dependencies igmcdermott Linux - Software 1 08-06-2004 02:26 AM
ATI driver: ATI 9600XT failed dependencies igmcdermott Linux - Software 1 08-06-2004 02:24 AM
ATI Radeon 9200 SE TV-OUT without ATI Driver? carboncopy Slackware 6 07-11-2004 08:30 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > SUSE / openSUSE

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration