[SOLVED] What is the softpf future of SlackwareARM post-14.2?
Slackware - ARMThis forum is for the discussion of Slackware ARM.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Are there any considerations for a hard float port with -march=armv6 following the successfull rollout of the -march=armv7-a port?
No - In the same way as the armv5 is legacy, as is the armv6. It's just one of those unfortunate things where the RPI foundation chose an older CPU that all distributions had skipped over.
The *-current hard float port is unfortunately (due to -march=armv7-a) not compatible with Rapsberry Pi 1/B/B+
Amen to that! It's not unfortunate as much as it's a blessing. Slackware ARM 14.2 is still available for the RPi 1 and runs as flawlessly as ever. Like all computer hardware becomes eventually, the RPi 1 is getting old and is supplanted by more advanced technology. It was good for a few years while the RPi Foundation kept dangling the carrot by releasing variations and upgraded +versions (etc.) and keeping the community interested enough to keep throwing money at it. As Mozes states, the technology that was employed, which was subject to an imposed $35 limit, meant that the RPi 1 was pretty much in a class of its own. It served its purpose and as time and technology moved on and became more affordable, better and brighter things came over the horizon.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.