Slackware - ARM This forum is for the discussion of Slackware ARM. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
09-13-2016, 06:30 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 17
Rep:
|
What is the softpf future of SlackwareARM post-14.2?
What is the soft float (softfp) port future of SlackwareARM moving forward from 14.2?
The *-current hard float port is unfortunately (due to -march=armv7-a) not compatible with Rapsberry Pi 1/B/B+
|
|
|
09-13-2016, 08:15 AM
|
#2
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,676
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k4fr0s
What is the soft float (softfp) port future of SlackwareARM moving forward from 14.2?
The *-current hard float port is unfortunately (due to -march=armv7-a) not compatible with Rapsberry Pi 1/B/B+
|
It's dead but 14.2 will be maintained.
Last edited by drmozes; 09-13-2016 at 08:36 AM.
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
09-13-2016, 08:48 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 17
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the prompt reply drmozes,
Are there any considerations for a hard float port with -march=armv6 following the successfull rollout of the -march=armv7-a port?
|
|
|
09-13-2016, 09:41 AM
|
#4
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,676
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k4fr0s
Thanks for the prompt reply drmozes,
Are there any considerations for a hard float port with -march=armv6 following the successfull rollout of the -march=armv7-a port?
|
No - In the same way as the armv5 is legacy, as is the armv6. It's just one of those unfortunate things where the RPI foundation chose an older CPU that all distributions had skipped over.
|
|
|
09-13-2016, 09:49 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 17
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for the clarification drmozes
|
|
|
09-13-2016, 08:47 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slackʍɐɹǝ
Posts: 1,488
|
I have a couple Pi Zero's I have a project planned for that I'll have to keep on 14.2.
|
|
|
11-25-2016, 02:32 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,512
|
Obsoleted by design? :/
|
|
|
11-25-2016, 04:00 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Middlesbrough, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 264
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by k4fr0s
The *-current hard float port is unfortunately (due to -march=armv7-a) not compatible with Rapsberry Pi 1/B/B+
|
Amen to that! It's not unfortunate as much as it's a blessing. Slackware ARM 14.2 is still available for the RPi 1 and runs as flawlessly as ever. Like all computer hardware becomes eventually, the RPi 1 is getting old and is supplanted by more advanced technology. It was good for a few years while the RPi Foundation kept dangling the carrot by releasing variations and upgraded +versions (etc.) and keeping the community interested enough to keep throwing money at it. As Mozes states, the technology that was employed, which was subject to an imposed $35 limit, meant that the RPi 1 was pretty much in a class of its own. It served its purpose and as time and technology moved on and became more affordable, better and brighter things came over the horizon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCerovec
Obsoleted by design? :/
|
You bet! 
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|