SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Due to a recent slackware64-current update, I am no longer able to use bold and/or italic fonts in xfce4-terminal. No matter what I select, I only get the "regular" variant.
For what it's worth, I am still able to pick bold and/or italic fonts in gVim.
Hoping this change hits -current soon. I actively want to set a bold font for everything. There's already a separate option to render SGR bold as a bold font, and I have that disabled because I already have SGR bold mapped to brighter colors.
Maybe you could edit your ttf bold font with fontforge, setting the bold font to normal font in font infos, then save it to a new font file, install it in your ~/.fonts directory and choose it...
I don't understand why the upstream maintainer can't just leave well enough alone and let the user decide how to render the font. Besides, a complete implementation would filter out bold and italic fonts from the font picker. That would be a lot less surprising to the user than having the choice be quietly overridden. Maybe I should get in touch.
For now, I switched to a different font I found suitably readable in non-bold.
That's a good point, though in this instance the rendering of the bold SGR attribute is an option. So that's analogous to a web browser letting the user pick the default font and having an option about whether or not websites are allowed to deviate from the default, but then still preventing the user from letting the default font be bold. While still allowing the user to pick a bold font, just quietly ignoring the bold weight.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.