SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Being that it's almost as lightweight as FVWM-2 (and thus a lot lighter than recent XFCE versions), and Slackware has always been rather lightweight and heavily used on servers, it kind of makes sense it be here, yet I don't see anyone talking about including it. Is it because no one else wants it or what?
Thanks, Mike
P.S. OT, but I hope Pat includes the 3.9 or 3.10 kernel on release, dm cache and/or bcache looks insanely useful!
Thank you for your packages, Ponce, and I intend to install them one of these days and give it a try; I understand that the Salix LXDE package also works out of the box (or nearly so).
However, my question was whether Pat and company will ever officially include LXDE in a future release. I realize there are arguably too many WM's in Slackware, and I wonder how many people still use TWM, but LXDE, from the screenshots, seems to keep the simplicity of Slack and seems like it would be a good fit.
I would like Openbox in there, but there is quite a lot of *box in there already...
Frankly, if the choice was not already benevolently dictated, my vote would be against it - for a technical reason: Lxde is under development and has come a long way over a short time. Since it will not be updated regularly as part of the Slackware project, I think this package belongs in the hands of the community. The frequently updated SlackBuilds make Slackware my distribution of choice partly because it allows for a cutting edge system. Same for Razor QT.
I apologize for throwing in an off-topic post here. But this is not quite true, I believe. For example: the ClamAV Slackbuild is two releases behind already. Another example is udevil; the Slackbuild is way behind.
On the other hand, people like ALienbob and Ponce provide much more up to date Slackbuilds many times. For example: Libreoffice 4.0.3 is already available on "taper.alienbase.nl" a few days after it was released.
Slackbuilds are updated only if the people in charge of them update them. Often most aren't updated as frequently as we'd like, like ClamAV, but the scripts are editable to work with updated versions with minor adjustments. Otherwise, just download, build from source, and archive your source in /usr/src so you can uninstall or rebuild if needed.
My two cents: We have a Qt based DE (KDE), a GTK based DE (XFCE), some *boxes and things like FVWM and WindowMaker. IMHO, if there should be an addition to make Slackware more complete for the enduser it should be either a tiling WM (i3 would be nice), Enlightenment (to have a third toolkit, EFL, and because it is very lightweight and nice looking) or both.
[...]
However, my question was whether Pat and company will ever officially include LXDE in a future release. I realize there are arguably too many WM's in Slackware, and I wonder how many people still use TWM, but LXDE, from the screenshots, seems to keep the simplicity of Slack and seems like it would be a good fit.
[...]
I'm using TWM on an old Toshiba Qosmio laptop....really resource friendly and a lot of fun!
Originally posted by rkfb
I'm using TWM on an old Toshiba Qosmio laptop....really resource friendly and a lot of fun!
I'm using TWM on a desktop that is set up as a dedicated Mythtv backend. The only X app the thing runs is mythtv-setup, and TWM makes it easy to run it when necessary without keeping a mouse on the machine.
My two cents: We have a Qt based DE (KDE), a GTK based DE (XFCE), some *boxes and things like FVWM and WindowMaker. IMHO, if there should be an addition to make Slackware more complete for the enduser it should be either a tiling WM (i3 would be nice), Enlightenment (to have a third toolkit, EFL, and because it is very lightweight and nice looking) or both.
+100 for the idea about inclusion of a tiling wm. It may start to live in testing/ whereas abandoned Blackbox wm (8 years since last update) shall be sent to the pasture.
Some poll what tiling wm would fit best to Slackware ? In sense of project's maturity and to introduce minimum of new dependencies as possible ?
Candidates that come on my mind are dwm, i3 or ratpoison.
xmonad is very mature and stable but has massive dependencies in haskell's compiler ghc & libraries.
awesome is nice but changes its api frequently and depends on bleeding edge parts of xcb libraries.
subtle (use personally) is handy and relatively stable, but cann't say its development is continuous one can rely on.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.