Which virtualisation technology do you use on your Slack?
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: What virtualisation technology do you use?
Which virtualisation technology do you use on your Slack?
Having read the article criticising the quality of vbox driver code, I got curious which virtualisation software you use on your Slackware machine.
I've been running VirtualBox for the last 3-4 years. I used to have all sorts of problems with it, but now I can't really complain. Having said that, I don't think I've tried any other for ages.
As I said, personally I haven't had any problems with it, but perhaps there are better solutions out there
Thanks. They say that the VMware code is better (and I know that the 3D driver is actually faster than Virtualboxes driver), but I am not a good enough programmer to judge the quality of that driver's code.
As stated above, works without a problem here.
I am quite happy with virtualbox (using since 1.5), but cautious when upgrading, rather trying not to upgrade so often, only if newer kernel forces me to. When i was looking into virtualization software, windows performance in qemu was slow - i mean, how windows were redrawn at screen and menus etc - booting was fine, but interacting with GUI laggy.
Is it possible to boot Virtualbox VDI images with qemu?
Distribution: slackware64 13.37 and -current, Dragonfly BSD
Posts: 1,810
Rep:
I voted the VirtualBox as that's my main package but I occasionally use all three of the top three as Qemu lets my emulate other hardware and Vmware has certain little fancy facilities. In saying that Vmware has stopped working since I upgraded it and needs fixing. I use VirtualBox very often every single day and find it a life saver for certain things.
On Slackware 13.0 and 13.1 I used Xen and I must say that its performance for Slackware hosts (or domU as they are called in Xen-speak) was impressive. It is not a trivial job to install, but unless I am mistaken Xen is finally integrated in the vanilla kernel.
I never tried vmware.
Virtualbox is great but a bit slow.
Qemu is versatile and nicely documented, but I found it too slow for my resources.
On the desktop I use VirtualBox. I like its ease of use and setup as well as its performance. At work we use kvm/qemu for our servers, and turns out to be a good combination. Qemu by itself is too slow compared to VBox.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.