Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
05-29-2006, 06:05 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Rep:
|
Very small slackware installation
Hello friends,
I am using Slackware for very long time now. I would like to install a Slackware on a 512 mb usb drive. I need all the command line tools, but not a GUI. If someone can suggest me will slackware accomodate on such a small space with a swap partition, or which other slackware based distros will help. I will be much grateful.
With warm regards,
Vivek.
|
|
|
05-29-2006, 06:31 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London, England
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,460
Rep:
|
Take a look at Slax?
|
|
|
05-29-2006, 07:22 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: The grassy knoll
Distribution: Slackware,Debian
Posts: 192
Rep:
|
Believe it or not, I have Slackware-current installed on 350mb of space on a crappy old 120mhz laptop someone gave me.
And a 100mb of swap.
I have most of A packages, some stuff from AP, apache, mysql and php, and the minimal N packages to get me Interneted. And the minimum of Emacs. php/mysql stuff is a litte sluggish but other than that everything runs quite well.
du -h output
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 354M 296M 39M 89% /
Last edited by vls; 05-29-2006 at 07:49 AM.
|
|
|
05-29-2006, 07:35 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Northern VA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, OS X
Posts: 782
Rep:
|
Or, Zipslack.
I believe there are quite a few mini-linuxes out there that may fit on that small of a slice...some of those are slackware-based. Google should help you.
|
|
|
05-29-2006, 07:49 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: The grassy knoll
Distribution: Slackware,Debian
Posts: 192
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by unixfool
Or, Zipslack.
|
Zipslack on a Zipdrive is how I got it on the laptop (no CD).
|
|
|
05-29-2006, 09:09 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Siberia
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
|
I also have a small Slackware machine (256M). It's easy to make a great service machine for maintenance and managements tasks with the way the Slackware installation is scripted. If you use the right mode you can select each and every package you want.
512M is enough for a nice desktop machine
Like oneandoneis2 said, Slax is also a great choice. It has distros from around 50M and up and is very, very nice.
|
|
|
05-29-2006, 11:14 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 173
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivekjoshi
Hello friends,
If someone can suggest me will slackware accomodate on such a small space with a swap partition
|
If you have 256Mb of RAM I think that swap partition is useless, unless you make something heavy on memory, like mySQL. I have 256Mb + GUI (iceWM) and only 20Mbytes of swap is used BUT 70Mbytes are cached. So in reality, I have 50 Mbytes free. Try with small swap, I have 100Mbytes I wish I made it smaller!
ZipSlack is superb, well, it is slackware!
|
|
|
05-29-2006, 01:46 PM
|
#8
|
Amigo developer
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,928
|
If all you want is CLI, use ZipSlack, or at least follow the packages list for it to create you own. Or, now you use the package list from the rescue image on CD2 which is zipslack minus the sound packages.
I have built a special distro for running from USB with a nice GTK-1.2 GUI and around 20 desktop apps -all in 240MB and without leaving out any documents or programs that leave it non-POSIX.
Actually, RUNT Linux is what you are asking for. It's untainted Zipslack plus extra networking tools. Trouble is that to use it from USB you'll always have to boot with an initrd -either boot-floppy or CD or syslinux on the drive. And it uses umsdos, so it may be slower and less robust. And, it'll trash your drive after awhile. But you'll feel right at home.
|
|
|
05-30-2006, 01:31 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks a lot,
Hello friends,
Thanks a lot for your suggestions. I am very much looking forwared to install zipslack on my small drive. And I am also going to try slackware without the X. I hope I succeed. I will get back to your and tell you what happened.
With warm regards,
Vivek.
|
|
|
05-30-2006, 06:27 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519
Rep:
|
I run zipslack. Zipslack stock install is really 120 meg once you put it on an ext2 file system instead of fat32.
You get a ton of stuff in ziplsack that I personally deleted. I got zipslack down to 65 meg on ext2. I added in X11, x11-misc fonts and x11 100dpi fonts. I then added blackbox becaue I wanted gui. I'm still under 200 meg.
firefox put me just over 205 meg.
Last edited by Old_Fogie; 06-10-2006 at 04:50 PM.
|
|
|
05-30-2006, 08:15 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 32
Rep:
|
Ive just done a basic install of slack on a machine that will be my fileserver, however ive decided to build from the ground up, so installed most of a and a few from ap.
Just over 150 meg with the 2.6 kernel in testing
|
|
|
06-01-2006, 02:01 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaYoS
Ive just done a basic install of slack on a machine that will be my fileserver, however ive decided to build from the ground up, so installed most of a and a few from ap.
Just over 150 meg with the 2.6 kernel in testing
|
very nice! put it in ram put it in ram if you can! that badboy will fly.
|
|
|
06-02-2006, 07:02 AM
|
#13
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi friends, I put zipslack on a VMware win98 machine. It runs fast, and that too on a VMware. But it dosen't give any gcc or libraries, not even the make util. My purpose is to get things started on a USB pen drive. And to make that pen drive as a plug and play server that can be highly portable with various kernels in it. I also tried RUNT linux. But it wouldn't boot. I tried to tweak bios but failed. The bios does support USB booting. I also tried Slackware 10 with a and ap sections and with networking. But it went over 600 MB and again it wouldn't boot. I am now trying some different settings on my bios and I will be back and tell you what happened.
Your mails have been a great help to me. Thanks a lot everyone.
With warm regards,
Vivek J. Joshi.
|
|
|
06-02-2006, 01:09 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519
Rep:
|
zip slack has a lot of stuff in it too that can be removed to be honest. i got it down to 60 meg on one machine. but your right, thinks like make,gcc are not in there. you just get your handy cd you got the first one, and install those packs from "l"
Last edited by Old_Fogie; 06-10-2006 at 04:30 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|