LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2006, 11:02 AM   #1
Greg Buchholz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Kennewick, WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
upgrading KDE from 9.1


I'm running a Slackware 9.1 system here (well, it started out that way), and I decided to upgrade KDE a little. So I grabbed...

kdelibs-3.5.1-i486-1
kdebase-3.5.1-i486-1
qt-3.3.5-i486-1

...from slackware-current and ran upgradepkg. So far, so good. But when I try to run something like konqueror, I get messages complaining about...

Could not find start_launcher: /opt/kde/lib/kde3/klauncher.so: undefined symbol: start_launcher
kdeinit: Communication error with launcher. Exiting!
---------------------------------
It looks like dcopserver is already running. If you are sure
that it is not already running, remove /home/greg/.DCOPserver_greg__0
and start dcopserver again.
---------------------------------


...and konqueror doesn't start. If I try k3b, I get messages like...


k3b: Symbol `_ZTI18KUniqueApplication' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTI9KComboBox' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTIN6KParts14DockMainWindowE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTI11KMainWindow' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTIN6KParts8PartBaseE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
Could not find start_launcher: /opt/kde/lib/kde3/klauncher.so: undefined symbol: start_launcher
kdeinit: Communication error with launcher. Exiting!


...but at least it starts after brining up lots of little dialog boxes complaining about malformed URLs. But it doesn't work. So I must have something missing or out of sync, but I'm not sure which part that is. FWIW, here's the output of 'ldd /opt/kde/lib/kde3/klauncher.so'

linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libkdeinit_klauncher.so => /opt/kde/lib/libkdeinit_klauncher.so (0xb7fc2000)
libkio.so.4 => /opt/kde/lib/libkio.so.4 (0xb7c78000)
libkdeui.so.4 => /opt/kde/lib/libkdeui.so.4 (0xb7992000)
libkdesu.so.4 => /opt/kde/lib/libkdesu.so.4 (0xb7978000)
libkwalletclient.so.1 => /opt/kde/lib/libkwalletclient.so.1 (0xb7966000)
libkdecore.so.4 => /opt/kde/lib/libkdecore.so.4 (0xb7719000)
libDCOP.so.4 => /opt/kde/lib/libDCOP.so.4 (0xb76e4000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0xb76b6000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib/tls/libutil.so.1 (0xb76b2000)
libart_lgpl_2.so.2 => /usr/lib/./libart_lgpl_2.so.2 (0xb769b000)
libidn.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libidn.so.11 (0xb766b000)
libkdefx.so.4 => /opt/kde/lib/libkdefx.so.4 (0xb7640000)
libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/lib/qt/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0xb6f5b000)
libmng.so.1 => /usr/lib/./libmng.so.1 (0xb6f01000)
libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/./libjpeg.so.62 (0xb6ee4000)
libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/./libGL.so.1 (0xb6e71000)
libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0xb6e5b000)
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0xb6e57000)
libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0xb6e4d000)
libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0xb6e4b000)
libXft.so.2 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2 (0xb6e39000)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xb6e12000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/./libfreetype.so.6 (0xb6dae000)
libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/./libexpat.so.0 (0xb6d8f000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb6d8a000)
libpng.so.3 => /usr/lib/./libpng.so.3 (0xb6d60000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0xb6d52000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb6c8b000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xb6c82000)
libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xb6c6b000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0xb6c58000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0xb6c50000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/./libz.so.1 (0xb6c43000)
libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/./libstdc++.so.5 (0xb6b92000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb6b6f000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb6a40000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/./libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6a36000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb6956000)
libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0xb6903000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)

Any hints on what I should try next?

Thanks,

Greg Buchholz

(P.S. I don't use KDE as my desktop, I just want to run programs like k3b.)
 
Old 06-12-2006, 11:27 AM   #2
320mb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577

Rep: Reputation: 48
slack 9.1 runs kde 3.14......that's a huge jump to 3.5x
you'll need to read the changelogs that pat has posted to see what packages/libraries will need to be upgraded so 3.5x will work properly!!
 
Old 06-12-2006, 12:08 PM   #3
Greg Buchholz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Kennewick, WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
removepkg

Looks like I just needed to remove the old KDE package. Now konqueror works fine. But k3b still reports...

k3b: Symbol `_ZTI18KUniqueApplication' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTI9KComboBox' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTIN6KParts14DockMainWindowE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTI11KMainWindow' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking
k3b: Symbol `_ZTIN6KParts8PartBaseE' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking

...I wonder where this comes from.
 
Old 06-12-2006, 12:25 PM   #4
Greg Buchholz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Kennewick, WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Just warning

And even those messages from k3b must just be warning, since I just successfully burned a DVD.
 
Old 06-12-2006, 08:28 PM   #5
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
Why not just upgrade to Slack v10.2? You'll automatically get a KDE upgrade, plus numerous other upgrades as well.
 
Old 06-13-2006, 01:45 PM   #6
Greg Buchholz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Kennewick, WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Easier

Because it is easier to just upgrade KDE libs than the rest of my system.
 
Old 06-13-2006, 01:54 PM   #7
drkstr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle, WA: USA
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 1,191

Rep: Reputation: 45
I had to upgrade the following packages from Slackware-current to get KDE 3.5 working good on my Slackware 10.2.

x/*
kde/*
l/glibc
d/gcc
d/gcc-g++
l/libpng
a/acl (new package)

Quote:
Looks like I just needed to remove the old KDE package.
make sure you use 'upgradepkg' and not 'installpkg'. This prevents conflicting versions of multiple installs.

regards,
...drkstr
 
Old 06-13-2006, 11:12 PM   #8
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Boise, ID
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Buchholz
Because it is easier to just upgrade KDE libs than the rest of my system.
True, it's easier to upgrade just one aspect of your system, just as it's easier to paint one wall rather than the entire room. It's your system and whatever choice you make is entirely up to you, but I'd point out that v9.1 was released in Sept 2003, and many improvements in both the kernel and the distro itself have happened in the past 3 years. Perhaps a full upgrade would not be beneficial for your particular situation, but the only point I was trying to make was that spending a little extra time to bring everything up to date rather than just the DE wouldn't be a bad thing. Your call though, good luck with whichever route you choose to take.
 
Old 06-14-2006, 11:11 AM   #9
Greg Buchholz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Kennewick, WA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Yeah.

I just do all of my upgrading incrementally, instead of all at once. So going to something like 10.2 would be a step backwards for me in terms of kernel, glibc, (and now) KDE, etc.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help! Upgrading from KDE 3.4 to 3.5 primalwarez Slackware 4 01-15-2006 12:51 PM
Upgrading KDE carlosinfl Fedora 1 05-18-2004 05:47 AM
Upgrading KDE mrd Linux - Software 8 04-09-2004 06:17 AM
upgrading kde? madchmst82 Linux - Software 1 09-26-2003 07:00 PM
Upgrading from KDE 2.1.1 to 3.1.1 Linus VanPelt Linux - Software 6 03-30-2003 12:31 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration