LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-30-2017, 03:24 AM   #1
nivieru
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2008
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 14
texlive made it into current


Texlive finally replaced the outdated tetex in the latest current, surely a cause for celebrations!

However, before I replace my own texlive installations, can anyone tell what is included in this package? the source has a readme mentioning that tlmgr isn't included, but I don't know what else is or isn't.

Edit:
Oh, I found it, the prep/texmf_get.sh file in the source directory has all the details

Thanks Patrick, Johannes Schoepfer, and the slackware team for all the hard work,

Niv

Last edited by nivieru; 09-30-2017 at 03:30 AM.
 
Old 09-30-2017, 05:58 AM   #2
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,227

Rep: Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015Reputation: 1015
This is no good, i prefer the old, just a joke
 
Old 09-30-2017, 06:16 AM   #3
Toutatis
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2013
Posts: 412

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I am using the texlive distribution, installed from the texlive iso, somewhere out of the /usr tree. Very easy to install. You have just to edit $PATH to make it work. So I will not change to the slackware packages. But maybe for a new install of slackware, I would take the slackware packages.
But I would suggest some minor changes :
- put the extra 3 other texlive packages in the official slackware distribution (maybe they are too big)
- make the slackbuilds work directly with the texlive official tree
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-30-2017, 06:16 AM   #4
keithpeter
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2015
Location: 52:30N 1:55W
Distribution: Slackware 15.0, OpenBSD 7.4
Posts: 310

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Texlive 2017 base package including tikz and Python 3. Slackware next will be a good platform for doing maths stuff on. Nice to see & thanks all involved.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-30-2017, 07:15 AM   #5
staus
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 155

Rep: Reputation: 10
I always try out various distros by seeing if Lyx will correctly display its help files under tools. The old tetex software worked flawlessly in Slackware, but not after texlive was installed. That was the reason I did not use Robby Workmans texlive about a year ago. It is probably only missing one or two sty files.
 
Old 09-30-2017, 07:25 AM   #6
tramni1980
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Köln, Germany
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2 & -current, DragonFly BSD, OpenBSD
Posts: 819

Rep: Reputation: 55
Congratulations to Slackware team! This was very important! Good job!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-30-2017, 08:19 AM   #7
franzen
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 535

Rep: Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by nivieru View Post
Oh, I found it, the prep/texmf_get.sh file in the source directory has all the details
To see what's included in slackware-texlive, check /usr/share/texmf-dist/texlive.packages.meta

prep/texmf_get.sh provides names of collections-of-tex-packages(but not the content of theses collections) and single tex-packages, it is not visible what (hard)dependecies are pulled additionally. See texlive.tlpdb for all packages/collections/schemes provided by the texlive netarchives.

Johannes
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-30-2017, 10:23 AM   #8
garpu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,572

Rep: Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905
Any Lilypond users? Will this affect lilypond in any way? I know with tetex, we haven't been able to build documentation with the slackbuild. Might we actually have documentation again?
 
Old 09-30-2017, 10:43 AM   #9
franzen
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 535

Rep: Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by garpu View Post
Any Lilypond users? Will this affect lilypond in any way? I know with tetex, we haven't been able to build documentation with the slackbuild. Might we actually have documentation again?
Building the lilypond documentation(not the manpage/info) requires the cm-superfonts, afaik.
These fons need about the same space as the whole texlive-core package, so it's not likely to be added. You will need the texlive fonts-package(which includes cm-super) from SBo to build the documentation.

Johannes
 
Old 09-30-2017, 10:49 AM   #10
BCarey
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: New Mexico
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,639

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Thanks for adding this. It will be a great help.
 
Old 09-30-2017, 11:10 AM   #11
garpu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,572

Rep: Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by franzen View Post
Building the lilypond documentation(not the manpage/info) requires the cm-superfonts, afaik.
These fons need about the same space as the whole texlive-core package, so it's not likely to be added. You will need the texlive fonts-package(which includes cm-super) from SBo to build the documentation.

Johannes
OK, but I shouldn't need anything additional to get lilypond, proper, working? I can live without documentation.
 
Old 09-30-2017, 12:59 PM   #12
franzen
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 535

Rep: Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379Reputation: 379
Quote:
Originally Posted by garpu View Post
OK, but I shouldn't need anything additional to get lilypond, proper, working? I can live without documentation.
I didn't test, but i think you won't need anything more, than what you need now to build
and run lilypond.

Lilypond 2.18 doesn't need texlive or tetex at compile time(without documentation), and not on run time. Someone wrote me that lilypond 2.19-dev requires the gyre-fonts, and some extra fontconfig. The gyre-fonts are in texlive core package, so that's no problem when lilypond 2.20 is released.

Johannes
 
Old 09-30-2017, 11:31 PM   #13
garpu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,572

Rep: Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905Reputation: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by franzen View Post
I didn't test, but i think you won't need anything more, than what you need now to build
and run lilypond.

Lilypond 2.18 doesn't need texlive or tetex at compile time(without documentation), and not on run time. Someone wrote me that lilypond 2.19-dev requires the gyre-fonts, and some extra fontconfig. The gyre-fonts are in texlive core package, so that's no problem when lilypond 2.20 is released.

Johannes
Good to know, thanks! I haven't seen any issues since 2002 with texlive in the mailing list archives.
 
Old 10-01-2017, 01:37 AM   #14
cgorac
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Posts: 146

Rep: Reputation: 87
So as far as I can see now it's not possible to write Cyrillic out of the box? No T2A encoding file, and probably no Cyrillic fonts included.
 
Old 10-01-2017, 03:10 AM   #15
Ilgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0, Slackwarearm 14.2
Posts: 1,157

Rep: Reputation: 237Reputation: 237Reputation: 237
This is very good news. Removing tetex and installing texlive from slackbuilds.org had become a routine post-install operation for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toutatis View Post
But I would suggest some minor changes :
- put the extra 3 other texlive packages in the official slackware distribution (maybe they are too big)
- make the slackbuilds work directly with the texlive official tree
Few people would really need the extra stuff and they take too much space, so it may not be preferable to make the installer ISO considerabley larger for the benefit of a very few. But I completely agree that the extra packages should be available for those who need them. Your second suggestions looks like the best option to me. Instead of 4 out of 4 packages being provided by slackbuilds, it will then be 3 out of 4 --- not much of a change from the current situation.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Texlive in Current? byzkarl Slackware 2 01-17-2016 09:49 AM
update texlive (tlmgr): no texlive.tlpdb tramni1980 Slackware 3 03-30-2011 07:30 AM
Slackware64 -current made public! bsdunix Slackware 289 06-19-2009 12:15 AM
LXer: Slackware64 -current made public! LXer Syndicated Linux News 3 05-21-2009 12:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration