SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Do you guys know if the new 2.5 Kernel works with Slackware 9. My computer isnt really a "production" computer,so im willing to take the risk. Also, does the guide at the top of the forum still apply to the 2.5 kernel.
I'm running kernel 2.5.66 right now on Slack 9 and it works like a charm. All you need to update is remove the supplied modutils and install the latest version of Rusty Russells' module-init-tools from here:
Warning: 2.5 is an unstable kernel which is under development. If your not familiar or somewhat new with Linux, I'd suggest just sticking with the latest stable kernel which is 2.4.20.
I know its unstable, but ive always had good luck with Beta things. I was a beta tester for a couple versions of Windows, and apart from the occasional bug, it ran pretty good. I am a newbie, but I figured that it would be a good way to learn. Im going to custom compile my kernel anyway, so wouldnt it be the same with the 2.5 as it is with the 2.4?
Originally posted by contrasutra I know its unstable, but ive always had good luck with Beta things. I was a beta tester for a couple versions of Windows, and apart from the occasional bug, it ran pretty good. I am a newbie, but I figured that it would be a good way to learn. Im going to custom compile my kernel anyway, so wouldnt it be the same with the 2.5 as it is with the 2.4?
Well, as far as stability is concerned, 2.5.x is now pretty solid, and it's certainly more stable than any beta of Windows. However, there is always a risk with unstable kernels of nasty things like data corruption, so use it at your own risk. I'd recommend not keeping any valueable data on a 2.5.x without backing it up somewhere safe first.
That said, if you want to try out 2.5.x, go right ahead. It's stable enough now for mass-testing, and the kernel team needs your help in widespread testing of the new development kernel.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.