LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-12-2008, 01:09 PM   #61
rworkman
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,559

Rep: Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhubsith View Post
I have just finished installing Slackware 12.2. This was a "clean" install from scratch. Just about everything went well...
...LILO complains about not being able to find root=/dev/root.
Hrm, that's odd. Is there actually a /dev/root symlink present?
If so, what's the target, and is it really the / filesystem?
 
Old 12-12-2008, 01:45 PM   #62
dhubsith
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 72

Rep: Reputation: 25
Quote:
Originally Posted by rworkman View Post
Hrm, that's odd. Is there actually a /dev/root symlink present?
If so, what's the target, and is it really the / filesystem?
No symlink. But something else looks strange.... at Kinfocenter/Storage Devices I see:

Device: /dev/hda1 Type: reiserfs Size: N/A Mount Point: / Free: 0 B Full%: N/A
Device: /dev/root Type: ? Size: 8.0GB Mount Point: / Free: 5.9 GB Full%: 26.5%

So somehow both /dev/hda1 and /dev/root are claiming mount point /.

In fstab I have /dev/hda1 but not /dev/root.

Very strange.
 
Old 12-12-2008, 02:13 PM   #63
chess
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware and OpenBSD
Posts: 740

Rep: Reputation: 190Reputation: 190
Yes, this new /dev/root has been discussed here on LQ recently:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...evroot-688189/
 
Old 12-12-2008, 03:12 PM   #64
Ilgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0, Slackwarearm 14.2
Posts: 1,157

Rep: Reputation: 237Reputation: 237Reputation: 237
I've just upgraded to 12.2 from 12.1. As always, I followed the instructions in UPGRADE.TXT and CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT, and it was a piece of cake.

It's not mentioned in the release highlights, but 12.2 upgrades to Tcl/Tk 8.5 from 8.4, that was a nice surprise (Yeah ok, who uses Tcl these days, right? At least there are the aMSN users ).
 
Old 12-12-2008, 03:20 PM   #65
diver
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Posts: 24

Rep: Reputation: 15
Hi.
Another stupid question:
I run -current for couple of months.
If i simply change today mirrors slackpkg from -current to 12.2 i stay with 12.2 now?
-current now is 12.2 -> so simply to change my mirrors config file to 12.2 will
keep me on 12.2?

Is it wright ?

Last edited by diver; 12-12-2008 at 03:24 PM.
 
Old 12-12-2008, 03:34 PM   #66
niels.horn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,004

Rep: Reputation: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by diver View Post
Another stupid question:
There are no stupid questions!
Quote:
Originally Posted by diver View Post
I run -current for couple of months.
If i simply change today mirrors slackpkg from -current to 12.2 i stay with 12.2 now?
-current now is 12.2 -> so simply to change my mirrors config file to 12.2 will
keep me on 12.2?
Correct.
If you want to continue the adventure of following -current, leave your mirror as is. If you want to stay with the -stable version and just update security fixes, change your mirror to 12.2

Last edited by niels.horn; 12-12-2008 at 03:35 PM. Reason: typo...
 
Old 12-12-2008, 05:37 PM   #67
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,661

Rep: Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784
Quote:
Originally Posted by rworkman View Post
Well, maybe I'm a bit of a special case, but I feel like I have an obligation to run -current on my main "rely on" system (which is my laptop), and I think the rest of the team is pretty much the same way. The benefit (for everyone) is that when something *does* stop working, there's some *real* incentive to get it fixed :-)
I also run -Current on all of my machines (two desktops, one laptop) and nothing to worry about (well, once, only at the beginning of -Current development where new things are introduced for the first time. After that, most of the updates are completely fine on my system).

In fact, my laptop is based on Slackware 10.1 and up to now i have been following -Current on that laptop and works just fine.
 
Old 12-12-2008, 08:24 PM   #68
rworkman
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,559

Rep: Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by niels.horn View Post
There are no stupid questions!
There are just lots of inquisitive idiots. ;-)

* No, that wasn't at all directed at anyone who asked a question in this thread -- it just reminded me of a "demotivational poster" at ThinkGeek.com
 
Old 12-13-2008, 07:21 AM   #69
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,298
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Finally took the plunge (on my laptop). Water's fine. No signs of piranhas or sharks yet.
 
Old 12-13-2008, 11:14 AM   #70
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Void, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 7,342

Rep: Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
Finally took the plunge (on my laptop). Water's fine. No signs of piranhas or sharks yet.
Yeah, finished my second install of 12.2 last night. Absolute perfection, no bugs evident.
 
Old 12-13-2008, 12:47 PM   #71
quietguy47
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Everett
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 805

Rep: Reputation: 35
does anyone have a breakdown of what is on which disk?
 
Old 12-13-2008, 01:00 PM   #72
SpelledJ
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, AL
Distribution: Slackware64-13.1, 12.1
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 20
The Slackware torrents page has a breakdown of which package series is on each CD.

http://slackware.com/getslack/torrents.php
 
Old 12-16-2008, 09:33 AM   #73
quietguy47
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Everett
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 805

Rep: Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpelledJ View Post
The Slackware torrents page has a breakdown of which package series is on each CD.

http://slackware.com/getslack/torrents.php
Thank you.
 
Old 12-16-2008, 03:53 PM   #74
ahmed gamal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Egypt
Distribution: slackware + XP
Posts: 591

Rep: Reputation: 30
the strange thing i had noticed that a lot of problems had appeared when slackware 12.2 had released
i don't know why ??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
isn't it tested perfectly ???
 
Old 12-16-2008, 04:35 PM   #75
titopoquito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Lower Rhine region, Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 14.2 and current, SlackwareARM current
Posts: 1,645

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmed gamal View Post
the strange thing i had noticed that a lot of problems had appeared when slackware 12.2 had released
i don't know why ??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
isn't it tested perfectly ???
(1) You seem to indicate that the errors come from Slackware 12.2 release. It may be just a coincidence, for example everyone looks closer if something strange happens when booting. Or some errors are discussed that are present in the vanilla code. Or the kernel developers changed something and these changes don't fit Slackware users habits. Fill in some other reasons for this ...... Maybe reread the posts and look what errors happened because of bad package integration, I guess you will not find many of them if any.

(2) Is your last question meant to be serious? What do you consider perfect? I think nearly *nothing* can be done perfectly. "Thorougly tested" would be what I hope for No offense intended, but the word "perfect" triggers my gyrus humoris
 
  


Reply

Tags
torrent



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Firebird 2.1 officially released LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-08-2008 06:20 PM
LXer: New Features In OpenOffice.org (Officially Released Now) LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-27-2008 07:50 PM
LXer: MonoDevelop 1.0 officially released LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-18-2008 08:00 PM
Slackware 12.0 is officially released Alien Bob Slackware 54 07-13-2007 03:32 PM
2.4.0 kernel has officially been released jeremy Linux - General 2 03-28-2005 04:16 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration