SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have just finished installing Slackware 12.2. This was a "clean" install from scratch. Just about everything went well...
...LILO complains about not being able to find root=/dev/root.
Hrm, that's odd. Is there actually a /dev/root symlink present?
If so, what's the target, and is it really the / filesystem?
I've just upgraded to 12.2 from 12.1. As always, I followed the instructions in UPGRADE.TXT and CHANGES_AND_HINTS.TXT, and it was a piece of cake.
It's not mentioned in the release highlights, but 12.2 upgrades to Tcl/Tk 8.5 from 8.4, that was a nice surprise (Yeah ok, who uses Tcl these days, right? At least there are the aMSN users ).
Hi.
Another stupid question:
I run -current for couple of months.
If i simply change today mirrors slackpkg from -current to 12.2 i stay with 12.2 now?
-current now is 12.2 -> so simply to change my mirrors config file to 12.2 will
keep me on 12.2?
I run -current for couple of months.
If i simply change today mirrors slackpkg from -current to 12.2 i stay with 12.2 now?
-current now is 12.2 -> so simply to change my mirrors config file to 12.2 will
keep me on 12.2?
Correct.
If you want to continue the adventure of following -current, leave your mirror as is. If you want to stay with the -stable version and just update security fixes, change your mirror to 12.2
Last edited by niels.horn; 12-12-2008 at 03:35 PM.
Reason: typo...
Well, maybe I'm a bit of a special case, but I feel like I have an obligation to run -current on my main "rely on" system (which is my laptop), and I think the rest of the team is pretty much the same way. The benefit (for everyone) is that when something *does* stop working, there's some *real* incentive to get it fixed :-)
I also run -Current on all of my machines (two desktops, one laptop) and nothing to worry about (well, once, only at the beginning of -Current development where new things are introduced for the first time. After that, most of the updates are completely fine on my system).
In fact, my laptop is based on Slackware 10.1 and up to now i have been following -Current on that laptop and works just fine.
the strange thing i had noticed that a lot of problems had appeared when slackware 12.2 had released
i don't know why ??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
isn't it tested perfectly ???
Distribution: Slackware64 14.2 and current, SlackwareARM current
Posts: 1,645
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmed gamal
the strange thing i had noticed that a lot of problems had appeared when slackware 12.2 had released
i don't know why ??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!
isn't it tested perfectly ???
(1) You seem to indicate that the errors come from Slackware 12.2 release. It may be just a coincidence, for example everyone looks closer if something strange happens when booting. Or some errors are discussed that are present in the vanilla code. Or the kernel developers changed something and these changes don't fit Slackware users habits. Fill in some other reasons for this ...... Maybe reread the posts and look what errors happened because of bad package integration, I guess you will not find many of them if any.
(2) Is your last question meant to be serious? What do you consider perfect? I think nearly *nothing* can be done perfectly. "Thorougly tested" would be what I hope for No offense intended, but the word "perfect" triggers my gyrus humoris
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.