LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-29-2011, 09:37 PM   #46
SqdnGuns
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Distribution: Slackware64® Current & Arch
Posts: 1,092

Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174

24...............as of right now.
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 04-29-2011, 09:37 PM   #47
escaflown
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 239

Rep: Reputation: 31
194, 219,126, 339
 
Old 04-29-2011, 09:39 PM   #48
ysg
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 (64-bit on desktop, 32-bit on netbook)
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 0
Only 16 packages for me.

This is for my 13.37 desktop. I pretty much have things how I want them at this point. But I would be interested in seeing the full list and how popular each package is. Might find a gem or two I didn't know about.
 
Old 04-29-2011, 09:39 PM   #49
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by unclejed613 View Post
anybode know how to export the package list to an sbopkg queue?
Queue > Add; then Save

or something like

sbopkg -p | rev | cut --complement -d- -f1-3 | rev | head -n-1 > $QUEUEDIR/all.sqf

Either of those will likely need editing if you need them specially ordered or need them with options, but it'll grab the names, anyway.
 
Old 04-29-2011, 09:41 PM   #50
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by escaflown View Post
194, 219,126, 339
Wow. I didn't know SBo even had almost two hundred billion packages.
 
Old 04-29-2011, 10:30 PM   #51
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,669

Rep: Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786Reputation: 1786
Got 77 packages
 
Old 04-29-2011, 10:59 PM   #52
escaflown
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 239

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by slakmagik View Post
Wow. I didn't know SBo even had almost two hundred billion packages.
I have 4 slack boxes: it's the count for each box.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 12:04 AM   #53
bosth
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 304

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 127Reputation: 127
I just ran all the submissions through the processor and here's how it stands at the moment:
Code:
=== Machines ===
  total:  125
  32-bit: 68
  64-bit: 57

=== Packages ===
  Total number of unique packages:  1709
  Total number of package installs: 9306
  Average number of packages per machine: 74
Moving to the top packages by number of installs, there's a nice three-way tie at the top between lame, libsigc++ and unrar. I'm a little surprised that two of the four most popular packages are compression (well, uncompression) utilities. Less surprising is the number of codecs in the top 20.
Code:
    1. lame (64)                                                                                                         
    2. libsigc++ (64)
    3. unrar (64)                                                                                                        
    4. p7zip (58)
    5. lua (56)                                                                                                          
    6. glibmm (54)
    7. x264 (54)
    8. faac (51)                                                                                                         
    9. cairomm (50)                                                                                                      
   10. faad2 (49)                                                                                                        
   11. pangomm (49)
   12. gtkmm (48)
   13. scons (48)                                                                                                        
   14. flash-player-plugin (46)                                                                                          
   15. libdvdcss (46)                                                                                                    
   16. libmp4v2 (45)                                                                                                     
   17. xvidcore (45)                                                                                                     
   18. imlib2 (42)                                                                                                       
   19. webcore-fonts (42)                                                                                                
   20. speex (41)
I noticed a few other things. A lot of people are clearly customising their SlackBuilds to use a newer version than the 'official' script (see calibre for example). A few people have added the _SBo tag to non SBo scripts (what's extra.fonts?). And someone out there has installed DevIL without a version number (DevIL--x86_64-3).

Code:
=== calibre =======================                                                                                      
installs: 8                                                                                                              
versions                                                                                                                 
  0.5.14: 1 (12%)
  0.7.18: 1 (12%)
  0.7.30: 1 (12%)
  0.7.36: 1 (12%)
  0.7.4: 1 (12%)
  0.7.46: 1 (12%)
  0.7.48: 2 (25%)
architecture
  i486: 4 (50%)
  x86_64: 4 (50%)
I'm attaching the current stats from all 125 submissions. I'm sure more will keep coming and I'll post again in a few days.
Attached Files
File Type: txt packagelist.txt (35.1 KB, 34 views)
File Type: txt packagestats.txt (207.7 KB, 27 views)

Last edited by bosth; 04-30-2011 at 12:07 AM.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 12:05 AM   #54
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,976

Rep: Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552Reputation: 1552
I did it again off my server. only 1.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 02:52 AM   #55
josiah
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 72

Rep: Reputation: 42
101, though I should really pare that down a little. I suppose it evens out, though, since there are one or two that have my own $TAG because I changed the SlackBuild too much.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 02:54 AM   #56
diwljina
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 111

Rep: Reputation: 8
126 packages were recorded. :-)
 
Old 04-30-2011, 02:55 AM   #57
josiah
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 72

Rep: Reputation: 42
Whoops, never mind, I left the SBo $TAG on the main one I was thinking of (Mixxx). In any case, Sauerbraten is about to be uninstalled, and I am about to decide that Wesnoth is taking too much of my time to stay. And NetworkManager needs to go, too. Maybe someday I'll prefer it over Wicd, but not yet.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 04:16 AM   #58
Mark Pettit
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 619

Rep: Reputation: 299Reputation: 299Reputation: 299
324 packages were recorded.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 04:29 AM   #59
Ramurd
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Distribution: Slackwarelinux
Posts: 703

Rep: Reputation: 111Reputation: 111
Submitted my 6 :-)
Have the tendency to build my own slackbuild scripts from my own template; I hate it that SBo puts everything in /tmp; clobbers that dir up too much for my taste... I like to have /tmp as clean as possible.
 
Old 04-30-2011, 04:37 AM   #60
Mark Pettit
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2008
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 619

Rep: Reputation: 299Reputation: 299Reputation: 299
@Ramurd - on traditional Unix boxes (eg Solaris, AT&T SVR4, etc) /tmp does not survive a reboot. Thus after a clean boot, /tmp is empty. I've always wondered why Linux has never done this. Easy to remedy of course - merely add a few lines of 'rm /tmp/*' and
'rm /tmp/.*' to one of the early startup scripts.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dell survey nirmaltom General 2 03-15-2007 03:08 PM
Linux Survey FastestHamster General 4 08-05-2006 01:11 AM
Computers and You: A Survey theCSapprentice General 23 11-09-2005 11:58 AM
Please take this quick survey Baryonic Being General 6 01-29-2005 10:01 PM
Gnome survey phatbastard Slackware 28 11-16-2004 11:11 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration