LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2006, 12:51 PM   #1
d00bid00b
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 157

Rep: Reputation: 31
Slack10.2 + XFce4 => v-e-r-y s-l-o-w


Hey all


I'm stumped!! My wife's machine is a dual boot win98 and Slackware 10.2, running XFce 4. The machine keeps running really (and really is literally painful to watch) slow - a sent email takes up to a minute to disappear from the screen for example; the mouse pointer sticks and jumps when dragged; menus take ages to appear; windows are refreshing after an age of something happening; etc.
This originally happened when she was running KDE so that is why I switched her to a low resource hog WM like Xfce. Before that, the system was really slow, but I changed the swap size and this seemed to fix the problem temporarily.
She has 250MB of RAM on board and the swap is 533MB, used physical mem was about 31% and used swap 38%. When looking at top, I see that the load average at its worst time was in the region of 4.4, 3.7 and 2.8 but 94.*% of the CPU(s) was idle!!??
I can't see any logical reason for this: she did have firefox open and kmail open with 2 emails, and konsole, but no multimedia, no resource intensive apps, etc.
What am I looking for to fix this and how would I start?

Any help gratefully received.
 
Old 06-20-2006, 01:30 PM   #2
vdemuth
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: West Midlands, UK
Distribution: Slackware 14 (Server),OpenSuse 13.2 (Laptop & Desktop),, OpenSuse 13.2 on the wifes lappy
Posts: 781

Rep: Reputation: 98
Sounds like it might possibly be your hard drive is not set right. Can you check output of hdparm Should look similar to this:- You are looking for using_dma = 1. if not, send back your output



hdparm /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
multcount = 0 (off)
IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit)
unmaskirq = 0 (off)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 256 (on)
geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 58605120, start = 0
 
Old 06-20-2006, 01:56 PM   #3
d00bid00b
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 157

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
hey vdemuth

Thanks for the quick response.

The output of hdparm /dev/hda is:

Quote:
/dev/hda:
multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
unmaskirq = 1 (on)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readfahead = 8 (on)
geometry = 2495/255/63, sectors = 40088160, start = 0
Now what? What does this mean, and is this likely to be the source of the problem. It seems to have cleared up now, but for prevention purposes I'd like to get to the bottom of this if I can.

Cheers
 
Old 06-20-2006, 02:10 PM   #4
Vgui
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 496

Rep: Reputation: 31
I'm wondering if it is something with the graphics then. What about trying another window manager and seeing if the problem persists? I'm wondering if xfce is trying to do some crazy transparency or antialiased fonts that cause the system to slow. I know that any type of graphical magic with only software drivers will cause the CPU to spike severly.

If a new wm still doesn't make a difference, you might have to try tweaking the xorg.conf file, things like color depth, refresh rate, etc.

Also, what are the full specs for the machine? You didn't mention the CPU speed or the video card (if there is one), and more information always helps.

One more thing, what was taking the ~90% CPU in top?
 
Old 06-20-2006, 08:20 PM   #5
theoffset
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Guadalajara, Jal, Mexico
Distribution: Slackware Linux
Posts: 211

Rep: Reputation: 31
I've run both, KDE and Xfce under worse conditions (128Mb in a k6-2 CPU) and they perform at an acceptable speed (no more than 1 second lag for the windows to dissapear)

I don't think this has anything to do with the amount of RAM. I'd be searching for faulty hardware (HD or RAM, maybe some other stuff?) or maybe a misconfigured (read: totally screwed up) xorg.conf file.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting rid of XFCE4-panel...using xfce4 and Ubuntu jagibbs Linux - Software 1 04-06-2006 05:00 AM
xfce4.2 alaios Debian 2 05-20-2005 01:28 PM
Xfce4 Tod_Con Linux - Software 3 10-25-2004 12:11 AM
does anyone know how 2 turn XFce4 off??? johannst Linux - Software 1 01-06-2004 04:17 PM
Xfce4 gamehack Linux - Software 2 12-26-2003 08:41 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration