SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm having a strange behaviour with Slackware 10.1 and sata drives used with software raid. If I boot with a 10.0 cd and create a raid volume, the system begin to resync it with a 'normal speed' (more than 30MB/sec). If I make the same thing with a 10.1 cd, the resync is much slower, less than 3MB/sec. During normal operation hard disks are slow and the CPU show an high 'system time use' during disk access.
There was no difference using bare.i and sata.i kernel. I would exclude the software raid as a reason, because even a test with badblocks on a physical disk gave similar results.
I have the same problem on two different motherboards, both of them with intel chipset: a Tyan S5102 with Intel 875P, and a more recent Asus P4P800-F with i82865PE+ICH5. Regarding Tyan MB, I have not tried promise raid controller yet, but this is not an option, because it would not resolve the problem on the other motherboard.
High system CPU time would suggest a wrong IDE setup (Pio mode instead of UDMA), I tried to adjust something with hdparm, with no effect.
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04, Mint 13, RHES 5.5, RHES 6
Posts: 146
Rep:
Re: Slack10.1 slow sata raid
Quote:
Originally posted by DPY
If I boot with a 10.0 cd and create a raid volume, the system begin to resync it with a 'normal speed' (more than 30Mb/sec). If I make the same thing with a 10.1 cd, the resync is much slower, less than 3MB/sec.
Do you mean what you think you mean, or did you miss type? 30Mb/sec vs 3MB/sec is not apples to apples more like apples to oranges. Bits and Bytes
A bit (lowercase b) is a single character of data (0 zero or 1 one). A byte uppercase B) is eight characters of data. Therefore, eight bits make a byte. So if you didn't misstype your explanation your speeds may not be as different as you think.
It was only a typo (now corrected), both values must be intended in MEGABYTES (MB).
If you do a cat /proc/mdstat in a system with software raid, you can see its status: if one of the volumes is resynching, the system show the resynch speed, using [Mega|Kilo]bytes, not [Mega|Kilo]bits.
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04, Mint 13, RHES 5.5, RHES 6
Posts: 146
Rep:
Re: It was only a typo
Quote:
Originally posted by DPY It was only a typo (now corrected), both values must be intended in MEGABYTES (MB).
If you do a cat /proc/mdstat in a system with software raid, you can see its status: if one of the volumes is resynching, the system show the resynch speed, using [Mega|Kilo]bytes, not [Mega|Kilo]bits.
Thats fine, I was just trying to clarify for you and others who may not have know is all. Didn't want you to beat your brains in for no reason.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.