SBo scripts not building on current (read 1st post, pls)

ponce · 10-19-2022, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marav

Agreed
But, only xdg-desktop-portal-gtk is listed as dependency

BTW, and FWIW, I tested a full flatpak build from scratch on current together with all of its dependencies and everything went fine...

pchristy · 10-20-2022, 01:58 AM

Oops! Yes, I meant xdg-desktop-portal-gtk (missed the -gtk off when posting, sorry!)

And it aborted when building claiming I didn't have "libpipewire-0.2 >= 0.2.6". -Current uses libpipewire-0.3, so I'm assuming it doesn't like the major version bump for some reason.

It isn't working for me. Is there anything I can check to help tracing the issue?

All the other dependencies have built OK.

--
Pete

ponce · 10-20-2022, 02:23 AM

can you post a link to the log from running the SlackBuild (on pastebin.com, termbin.com or equivalent)?

pchristy · 10-20-2022, 03:18 AM

It doesn't even get that far - it fails at the configuration stage:

Code:

<snip>
checking for shared library run path origin... done
checking for CFPreferencesCopyAppValue... no
checking for CFLocaleCopyCurrent... no
checking for GNU gettext in libc... yes
checking whether to use NLS... yes
checking where the gettext function comes from... libc
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.24... yes
checking for bwrap... /usr/bin/bwrap
checking for BASE... yes
checking for PIPEWIRE... no
configure: error: Package requirements (libpipewire-0.2 >= 0.2.6) were not met:

No package 'libpipewire-0.2' found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables PIPEWIRE_CFLAGS
and PIPEWIRE_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

Also:

Code:

 locate libpipewire
/usr/lib64/libpipewire-0.3.so
/usr/lib64/libpipewire-0.3.so.0
/usr/lib64/libpipewire-0.3.so.0.359.0
<snip>

Does this help?

--
Pete

marav · 10-20-2022, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ponce

BTW, and FWIW, I tested a full flatpak build from scratch on current together with all of its dependencies and everything went fine...

Same here ...
And pipewire is not listed as dependency:

Code:

# objdump -x /usr/libexec/xdg-desktop-portal-gtk | grep NEEDED
  NEEDED               libgtk-3.so.0
  NEEDED               libgdk-3.so.0
  NEEDED               libz.so.1
  NEEDED               libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libpango-1.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libharfbuzz.so.0
  NEEDED               libatk-1.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libcairo-gobject.so.2
  NEEDED               libcairo.so.2
  NEEDED               libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libgio-2.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libgobject-2.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libglib-2.0.so.0
  NEEDED               libc.so.6

And I don't have these checks:

Code:

checking for bwrap... /usr/bin/bwrap
checking for BASE... yes

@pchristy
It will be usefull to have the full output of the build process

pchristy · 10-20-2022, 04:16 AM

Aaarrgh! I am an idiot!

I had inadvertently downloaded xdg-desktop-portal instead of xdg-desktop-portal-gtk! I really must get some new glasses!

Many apologies for the "noise"! Everything is now building correctly!

--
Pete

amikoyan · 10-21-2022, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pchristy

Aaarrgh! I am an idiot!

I had inadvertently downloaded xdg-desktop-portal instead of xdg-desktop-portal-gtk! I really must get some new glasses!

Many apologies for the "noise"! Everything is now building correctly!

--
Pete

If it makes you feel better, I had to look several times to see the "-gtk" bit, and I'm wearing my glasses!

pchristy · 10-22-2022, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amikoyan

If it makes you feel better, I had to look several times to see the "-gtk" bit, and I'm wearing my glasses!

Thanks for that!

Actually, I may have found something else that doesn't build anymore!

The reason I wanted FlatPak was because of the trouble i was having getting the latest release of OBS-studio to build. I thought I'd try the FlatPak version, but still ended up in dependency hell!

Trying to build the latest SBo version of OBS-studio on current fails when trying to build the chromium dependency. Not sure why it needs that for my application, as I'm only using it to digitise VHS cassettes. I'm not sat in front of my capture machine at the moment, but I'll try and post the build log later...

--
Pete

ponce · 10-22-2022, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pchristy

Thanks for that!

Actually, I may have found something else that doesn't build anymore!

The reason I wanted FlatPak was because of the trouble i was having getting the latest release of OBS-studio to build. I thought I'd try the FlatPak version, but still ended up in dependency hell!

Trying to build the latest SBo version of OBS-studio on current fails when trying to build the chromium dependency. Not sure why it needs that for my application, as I'm only using it to digitise VHS cassettes. I'm not sat in front of my capture machine at the moment, but I'll try and post the build log later...

--
Pete

Hi Pete,

FWIW (I'm not sure what's happening there) obs-studio builds fine on current here...

pchristy · 10-22-2022, 05:17 AM

Hi Matteo,

Just tried building it again - from scratch, using the 15.0 SBo 64-bit build downloads. I can't find a build log for the cef chromium dependency, which is what is built first and fails, but I've attached the text from where the error first appears. The relevant bit (repeated many times) seems to be:

Code:

In file included from /tmp/SBo/cef_binary_87.1.14+ga29e9a3+chromium-87.0.4280.141_linux64_minimal/include/cef_server.h:42,
                 from /tmp/SBo/cef_binary_87.1.14+ga29e9a3+chromium-87.0.4280.141_linux64_minimal/libcef_dll/cpptoc/server_handler_cpptoc.h:24,
                 from /tmp/SBo/cef_binary_87.1.14+ga29e9a3+chromium-87.0.4280.141_linux64_minimal/libcef_dll/cpptoc/server_handler_cpptoc.cc:15:
In member function ‘void CefRefCount::AddRef() const’,
    inlined from ‘void CefCppToCRefCounted<ClassName, BaseName, StructName>::AddRef() const [with ClassName = CefServerHandlerCppToC; BaseName = CefServerHandler; StructName = _cef_server_handler_t]’ at /tmp/SBo/cef_binary_87.1.14+ga29e9a3+chromium-87.0.4280.141_linux64_minimal/libcef_dll/cpptoc/cpptoc_ref_counted.h:80:22,
    inlined from ‘scoped_refptr<T>::scoped_refptr(const scoped_refptr<T>&) [with T = CefServer]’ at /tmp/SBo/cef_binary_87.1.14+ga29e9a3+chromium-87.0.4280.141_linux64_minimal/include/base/cef_ref_counted.h:304:19,
    inlined from ‘static CefRefPtr<BaseName> CefCToCppRefCounted<ClassName, BaseName, StructName>::Wrap(StructName*) [with ClassName = CefServerCToCpp; BaseName = CefServer; StructName = _cef_server_t]’ at /tmp/SBo/cef_binary_87.1.14+ga29e9a3+chromium-87.0.4280.141_linux64_minimal/libcef_dll/ctocpp/ctocpp_ref_counted.h:128:10:
/tmp/SBo/cef_binary_87.1.14+ga29e9a3+chromium-87.0.4280.141_linux64_minimal/include/cef_base.h:98:49: error: array subscript 38 is outside array bounds of ‘void [32]’ [-Werror=array-bounds]
   98 |   void AddRef() const { base::AtomicRefCountInc(&ref_count_); }
      |                                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~

Interpreting this is a bit above my pay grade!

--
Pete

cwizardone · 10-22-2022, 08:22 AM

Alienbob does have a package for that.

Quote:

Tue Oct 18 20:10:01 UTC 2022
obs-studio: updated to 28.0.3 (Slackware 15.0).
Depends on libfdk-aac, jack2, mbedtls, vlc, x264. It's a good idea to replace
Slackware's ffmpeg with my 'restricted' version or else recompile the
Slackware package to enable the AAC encoder.
Packages for -current were already added a week ago.

https://us.slackware.nl/people/alien/slackbuilds/

pchristy · 10-22-2022, 10:15 AM

Er, not sure if that's a reply to my OBS-studio issue or not, but I already recompiled Slackware's ffmpeg as soon as 5.1.2 was released to incorporate AAC.

--
Pete

USUARIONUEVO · 10-22-2022, 11:57 AM

Hi , python3-kiwisolver not build here on -current

Probably need switch to wheel installs.

++++++++++++++

python-pcapy 1.0.9 its not compatible with python2

for python 2 need 0.11.4

we need different build for this package.

python2-pcapy with 0.11.4

and can remain python-pcapy with 1.0.9 but remove python2 build process on this slackbuild.

Easy test

pip2 install pcapy

I have one package using python2 pcapy and 1.0.9 its not valid.

Thanks.

Probably a best way is on slackbuilds , push a python3-pcapy or python2-pcapy , but we need different versions.

pchristy · 10-22-2022, 01:10 PM

@cwizardone: Sorry about my previous post. I was reading it on my 'phone, and could barely make out what you were referring to!

Thanks for the pointer to Eric's build! Downloading it now, and will try and install in the morning (its evening here, and the family have just arrived!).

--
Pete

ponce · 10-22-2022, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO

Hi , python3-kiwisolver not build here on -current

Probably need switch to wheel installs.

please try these modifications and let me know

https://cgit.ponce.cc/slackbuilds/co...on3-kiwisolver

Quote:

Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO

python-pcapy 1.0.9 its not compatible with python2

for python 2 need 0.11.4

we need different build for this package.

python2-pcapy with 0.11.4

and can remain python-pcapy with 1.0.9 but remove python2 build process on this slackbuild.

Easy test

pip2 install pcapy

I have one package using python2 pcapy and 1.0.9 its not valid.

Thanks.

Probably a best way is on slackbuilds , push a python3-pcapy or python2-pcapy , but we need different versions.

could you please get in touch with fourtysixandtwo (that suggested the change)?

BTW there's nothing on SBo using python2-pcapy so IMHO an acceptable "solution" could be also to remove support for python2 from the script...