LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2022, 08:58 AM   #241
avian
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2014
Posts: 184

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmgf View Post
One suggestion:

btop-1.2.3:

https://github.com/aristocratos/btop

work fine on current.
Gotta say that looks pretty cool. Was about to install and was surprised there wasnt even a slackbuild for it.
 
Old 02-19-2022, 09:50 AM   #242
gmgf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2012
Location: Bergerac, France
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,217

Rep: Reputation: 1006Reputation: 1006Reputation: 1006Reputation: 1006Reputation: 1006Reputation: 1006Reputation: 1006Reputation: 1006
Quote:
Originally Posted by avian View Post
Gotta say that looks pretty cool. Was about to install and was surprised there wasnt even a slackbuild for it.
yes it is cool, it run in console or in one xterm

Last edited by gmgf; 03-29-2024 at 02:25 PM.
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-19-2022, 10:48 AM   #243
nobodino
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Near Bordeaux in France
Distribution: slackware, slackware from scratch, LFS, slackware [arm], linux Mint...
Posts: 1,564

Rep: Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892Reputation: 892
"simple-scan" as it's name: simple and efficient
 
Old 02-20-2022, 01:29 AM   #244
Lockywolf
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 683

Rep: Reputation: 253Reputation: 253Reputation: 253
The ibus-autostart, provided in "source/x/ibus" is not correct for the current build of ibus.

It has:
Code:
ibus-daemon -drx --panel=/usr/libLIBDIRSUFFIX/kimpanel-ibus-panel
Whereas:
Code:
ibus>locate -eb kimpanel-ibus-panel
/usr/lib64/libexec/kimpanel-ibus-panel
The "libexec" part is missing.
 
Old 02-20-2022, 02:14 AM   #245
SCerovec
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Cp6uja
Distribution: Slackware on x86 and arm
Posts: 2,471
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980Reputation: 980
Could we have fstransform as part of Slackware?

There is, so far, a working SlackBuild (without a maintainer) and the program transforms a filesystem in situ from one format into the other.

More info on the linked thread.
 
Old 02-20-2022, 04:32 AM   #246
zaphar
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 37

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What's already stated in this post:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post6070280
This would allow i586 machines to actually use i586 GTK programs. Firefox introduced a limitation against CPUs without SSE2 support, so this prevented a usable Firefox for these processors with Slackware 14.2 sometime in 2018. The performance is limited by today standards, but is still usable with a JavaScript limiter plugin and a few tabs open. GTK has pulled Rust in with the newer version included in 15.0, so this problem now permeates into many applications.
 
Old 02-20-2022, 02:33 PM   #247
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,508

Rep: Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328
How about adding the MPV media player?

The reason for this request is that MPV behaves way better than MPlayer on boxes with Chihuahua CPUs.

From my own experiences, on boxes having dual cores with 10-15W TDP CPUs like Intel Celeron J1800 or AMD E3000, the 1080p videos encoded with HEVC (or H265) are way too much for MPlayer to handle, resulting in high cpu usage and framing like hell. Basically, the videos are unwatchable.

Yet, the MPV plays them quite fine even on those boxes and with a visible lower CPU load.

Because of those visible superior performances on low power (certainly also on old) CPUs, I believe that adding it as an alternative to MPlayer would be very nice.

And in the end, how we have over 10 text editors, some bigger, some smaller, I think is nothing wrong on having yet another media player, specially when it works better.

Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 02-20-2022 at 04:33 PM.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-20-2022, 03:14 PM   #248
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,059

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
How about adding the MPV media player?
I concur. And IMO mpv is way better that vlc, even if it doesn't have a GUI. It can even display videos in a tty (outside of X and Wayland), and play directly you youtube videos, using yt-dlp if it finds it. BTW, yt-dlp and pipe-viewer would be nice additions too. Hint: these are included in Slint.

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 02-20-2022 at 03:15 PM.
 
Old 02-20-2022, 11:26 PM   #249
wirelessmc
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego County
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 183

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
IF I remember right, Slackware does not support anymore the installations with separate /usr , so it' just your own fault that you use it in unsupported ways. Please be kind to accept that you are the one to blame. After all, the cars aren't supposed to fly, the airplanes aren't supposed to run in highways.

However, there is a way to use a separate /usr partition: to mount it in an initrd, modifying the init script from it. I use this way on several computers, where for putting the elephant in a kitchen, I use a compressed squashfs for /usr .

In my humble opinion, the real issue it that our stock initrd is as customizable like is a wood log and they think that nobody ever will need to modify it.
Can someone tell me the when/why Slackware divested itself from supporting separate /usr partitions? I've been building my installations this way for decades now and have to see any issues. That's not to say I won't eventually get burned now that it is no longer supported.
 
Old 02-21-2022, 12:06 AM   #250
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,508

Rep: Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328Reputation: 3328
Quote:
Originally Posted by wirelessmc View Post
Can someone tell me the when/why Slackware divested itself from supporting separate /usr partitions? I've been building my installations this way for decades now and have to see any issues. That's not to say I won't eventually get burned now that it is no longer supported.
This started long years ago, when the UDEV and other tools used on boot started to use things like GLIB, libparted, libatasmart, etc.

Honestly, I think that the situation would be even worst in future regarding this, because today all the major distributions uses since long time an "unified layout" where the /bin, /sbin, /lib{,64} are just symlinks to the /usr counterparts, then the developers usually makes their programs with (and within) this particular layout.

I believe that we will be lucky if Slackware 16.0 would not adopt this layout too, for compatibility with the bigger distros.

I for one, for the systems where I have the /usr in a separate squashfs file (to minimize to space occupied by Slackware), I use a custom "mkinitrd" package, which I keep in sync with the official one, BUT which ships a modified /init script, which does the mounting of /usr near of its final stage.

This solution I strongly suggest also for you, because is the most convenient and consistent way, until Slackware would make really customizable its initrd - with plugins or ability to run custom scripts. Or, even better, just stop using a separate /usr at all, if you can.

Because I seriously doubt that Slackware will ever do (again) a consistent /usr split in the future. After all, is too much work for so less gain.

Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 02-21-2022 at 12:49 AM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-21-2022, 12:43 AM   #251
Ilgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0, Slackwarearm 14.2
Posts: 1,157

Rep: Reputation: 237Reputation: 237Reputation: 237
Quote:
Originally Posted by wirelessmc View Post
Can someone tell me the when/why Slackware divested itself from supporting separate /usr partitions? I've been building my installations this way for decades now and have to see any issues. That's not to say I won't eventually get burned now that it is no longer supported.
The only problem I encountered was libcryptsetup, which is now kept under /usr. Unlike the libcryptsetup of 14.2, this one depends on two external libraries that also live uder /usr, so one must move them all to /lib to make it work. In the long run, as LuckyCyborg says, there might be a whole other bunch of software in a similar situation, making a separate /usr impractical. I'm OK with that, in my case I had to separate /usr from / because the latter was out of disk space. But I would like the documentation to reflect such a change.

Last edited by Ilgar; 02-21-2022 at 02:54 AM. Reason: Typo
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 02-21-2022, 03:42 AM   #252
ZhaoLin1457
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,024

Rep: Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213Reputation: 1213
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
How about adding the MPV media player?

The reason for this request is that MPV behaves way better than MPlayer on boxes with Chihuahua CPUs.

From my own experiences, on boxes having dual cores with 10-15W TDP CPUs like Intel Celeron J1800 or AMD E3000, the 1080p videos encoded with HEVC (or H265) are way too much for MPlayer to handle, resulting in high cpu usage and framing like hell. Basically, the videos are unwatchable.

Yet, the MPV plays them quite fine even on those boxes and with a visible lower CPU load.

Because of those visible superior performances on low power (certainly also on old) CPUs, I believe that adding it as an alternative to MPlayer would be very nice.
I confirm that MPV works fine while MPlayer have huge issues with videos encoded with x265 and 1080p resolution, on my mini-PC with Intel Atom x4 z8350, so it's not necessary related only to dual core CPUs.

Last edited by ZhaoLin1457; 02-21-2022 at 04:22 AM.
 
Old 02-21-2022, 05:18 AM   #253
saxa
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Nova Gorica, Salvador
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,213

Rep: Reputation: 297Reputation: 297Reputation: 297
libsecret-0.20.5
https://download.gnome.org/sources/l...-0.20.5.tar.xz

libxml2-2.9.13
https://download.gnome.org/sources/l...-2.9.13.tar.xz
 
Old 02-21-2022, 06:00 AM   #254
Ilgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0, Slackwarearm 14.2
Posts: 1,157

Rep: Reputation: 237Reputation: 237Reputation: 237
Do we have a GUI tool for file search in 15.0? The average Slackware user might be expected to use 'find' in the terminal, but I am sure there are users who would be more comfortable with a GUI tool. 14.2 had kfind as part of KDE, but now it's gone and I don't know what the replacement is, if any.

There was searchmonkey in the SBo repo, but it is also gone. Currently I can see SGsearch in the git repo. Any other suggestions?
 
Old 02-21-2022, 06:41 AM   #255
marav
LQ Sage
 
Registered: Sep 2018
Location: Gironde
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,373

Rep: Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088Reputation: 4088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilgar View Post
Do we have a GUI tool for file search in 15.0? The average Slackware user might be expected to use 'find' in the terminal, but I am sure there are users who would be more comfortable with a GUI tool. 14.2 had kfind as part of KDE, but now it's gone and I don't know what the replacement is, if any.

There was searchmonkey in the SBo repo, but it is also gone. Currently I can see SGsearch in the git repo. Any other suggestions?
krunner is the "all-in-one" search tool for Plasma
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apache 2.4 requests to non-SSL site with "Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1" and no trailing / get redirected to default site owendelong Linux - Server 2 06-22-2021 02:08 PM
[SOLVED] Requests for -current (20151216) rworkman Slackware 3441 12-28-2017 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration