LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 04-24-2016, 12:17 PM   #856
Strykar
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware64, OpenBSD, Debian, Arch
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nille_kungen View Post
Do we need grub2 as default boot loader?
Isn't it enough that it's shipped and you can use it if you want.
I use grub2 but i don't mind that it's not default, i used elilo earlier.
It's certainly enough and that's what every slacker uses if they need grub. We've reached a point where the developer is abandoning the project stating "NOTE: I have finished development of LILO at December 2015 because of some limitations (e.g. with BTFS, GPT, RAID). If someone want to develop this nice software further, please let me know ...". If this isn't giving Pat at least some pause for thought, I guess we're okay.
 
Old 04-24-2016, 12:34 PM   #857
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,102

Rep: Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strykar View Post
It's certainly enough and that's what every slacker uses if they need grub. We've reached a point where the developer is abandoning the project stating "NOTE: I have finished development of LILO at December 2015 because of some limitations (e.g. with BTFS, GPT, RAID). If someone want to develop this nice software further, please let me know ...". If this isn't giving Pat at least some pause for thought, I guess we're okay.
https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...7/#post5459873
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-24-2016, 01:46 PM   #858
Strykar
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware64, OpenBSD, Debian, Arch
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponce View Post
Consider my LILO development question uninformed and now answered, thank you.
 
Old 04-25-2016, 02:23 AM   #859
Strykar
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2008
Distribution: Slackware64, OpenBSD, Debian, Arch
Posts: 42

Rep: Reputation: 6
How about including radvd as IPv6 is enabled in both kernels?
https://slackbuilds.org/repository/14.1/network/radvd/ which has a dependency on https://slackbuilds.org/repository/1...lopment/check/

Last edited by Strykar; 04-25-2016 at 02:25 AM.
 
Old 04-26-2016, 02:49 AM   #860
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strykar View Post
Consider my LILO development question uninformed and now answered, thank you.
Unless /boot partitions on BIOS systems change from any of the known formats to something else unknown then we have little to worry about with LILO, and I doubt that will happen.
 
Old 04-26-2016, 04:13 AM   #861
atelszewski.versades
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Unless /boot partitions on BIOS systems change from any of the known formats to something else unknown then we have little to worry about with LILO, and I doubt that will happen.
That time might come sooner than you think I was able to make LILO to fail to load the kernel on my NUC machine.
I don't remember the exact details, but it was something about the amount of the memory assigned to graphics via BIOS.
If the memory amount was too high, LILO simply wasn't able to boot the kernel.

It's not that big deal for the moment, since the graphics memory in BIOS can be set to something low and then the OS enlarges it as it needs.
Anyway, at that moment I switched to syslinux, since LILO was marked EOL already.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-26-2016, 08:37 AM   #862
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
I already switched to Grub myself. I've used SysLinux/ExtLinux but I didn't like it personally.
 
Old 04-26-2016, 08:43 AM   #863
atelszewski.versades
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
I already switched to Grub myself. I've used SysLinux/ExtLinux but I didn't like it personally.
I don't like Grub, but not personally :^)

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
 
Old 04-26-2016, 08:53 AM   #864
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,059

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by atelszewski.versades View Post
That time might come sooner than you think I was able to make LILO to fail to load the kernel on my NUC machine.
I don't remember the exact details, but it was something about the amount of the memory assigned to graphics via BIOS.
If the memory amount was too high, LILO simply wasn't able to boot the kernel.
Is it the bug for which Sl4ck3ver provided a patch in this thread? I ask because it has been fixed:
Code:
Sun Apr 24 03:44:25 UTC 2016
✀---
a/lilo-24.2-i586-2.txz:  Rebuilt.
   Patched usable memory bug.  Thanks to Sl4ck3ver.
Anyway Slackware provides lilo, elilo, grub and syslinux so we have enough software to be able to boot most machines.

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 04-26-2016 at 09:02 AM. Reason: Last sentence rephrased
 
Old 04-26-2016, 09:35 AM   #865
atelszewski
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 948

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier View Post
Is it the bug for which Sl4ck3ver provided a patch in this thread?
I don't think so, since if I recall correctly, I even haven't arrived at kernel message.
Sorry, I don't remember now.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
 
Old 04-26-2016, 10:06 AM   #866
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,109

Rep: Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284
Firefox-46

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo.../releasenotes/
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-26-2016, 11:05 AM   #867
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,102

Rep: Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177
Isn't it better to stick to an esr release (45.0.x) for 14.2 and leave the new ones for the next development cycle?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-26-2016, 11:17 AM   #868
atelszewski
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 948

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ponce View Post
Isn't it better to stick to an esr release (45.0.x) for 14.2 and leave the new ones for the next development cycle?
I'm in.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
 
Old 04-26-2016, 11:22 AM   #869
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,109

Rep: Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponce View Post
Isn't it better to stick to an esr release (45.0.x) for 14.2 and leave the new ones for the next development cycle?
Fine by me, but, IIRC, Firefox-45.x in -current is not a ESR release.
 
Old 04-26-2016, 11:32 AM   #870
atelszewski
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 948

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by cwizardone View Post
Fine by me, but, IIRC, Firefox-45.x in -current is not a ESR release.
Probably is.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] how to show the current time at the top in the current shell Always ? rohitchauhan Linux - General 5 04-09-2014 03:05 PM
Slackware ARM (current) epic mistake: the current Android kernels are kicked out! Darth Vader Slackware 16 08-25-2013 04:36 PM
[SOLVED] setup fails on most current Slackware-current March 26, 2012 AlleyTrotter Slackware 15 04-09-2012 06:05 AM
Observation of Feb -current vs March -current Hangaber Slackware 14 03-12-2010 08:26 AM
cvs diff the most current and second last current version powah Linux - Software 1 03-30-2006 01:02 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration