LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2021, 08:29 PM   #7006
chrisretusn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Philippines
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 2,973

Rep: Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551Reputation: 1551

Quote:
Originally Posted by camerabambai View Post
Why the /etc/slackpkg/mirrors on current has a 14.2 mirror as default?

Code:
# USE MIRRORS.SLACKWARE.COM (DO NOT USE FTP - ONLY HTTP FINDS A NEARBY MIRROR)
https://mirrors.slackware.com/slackw...ckware64-14.2/
#
If you decide to start using -current then you should know you will have to change it. My guess for the reason, is 14.2 is the stable release version thus mirror points to 14.2 because that is the default for the stable release version of Slackware. As it sits right now, if you have slackware-14.2 installed you will hose your system up since the "default" is set to slackware64=14.2 unless you change the mirror.

That said, I don't believe there should be a default mirror set in /etc/slackpkg/mirrors. I think /etc/slackpkg/mirrors should not have a default at all. Let the use pick a mirror as it was in the past.

My
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-06-2021, 10:44 PM   #7007
rworkman
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, Alabama (USA)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,559

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351Reputation: 1351
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisretusn View Post
If you decide to start using -current then you should know you will have to change it. My guess for the reason, is 14.2 is the stable release version thus mirror points to 14.2 because that is the default for the stable release version of Slackware. As it sits right now, if you have slackware-14.2 installed you will hose your system up since the "default" is set to slackware64=14.2 unless you change the mirror.

That said, I don't believe there should be a default mirror set in /etc/slackpkg/mirrors. I think /etc/slackpkg/mirrors should not have a default at all. Let the use pick a mirror as it was in the past.

My
You will get your money's worth in the 15.0.1 release :-)
Code:
commit 5c9d02046732b6b5970b6a209e32daaad44f6f55
Author: Robby Workman <rworkman@slackware.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 2 20:21:21 2021 -0600

    Update mirror files (14.2 -> 15.0)
    
    This also comments out the default mirror.
 
5 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-07-2021, 12:09 AM   #7008
pghvlaans
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2021
Distribution: Slackware64 {15.0,-current}, FreeBSD, stuff on QEMU
Posts: 452

Rep: Reputation: 364Reputation: 364Reputation: 364Reputation: 364
sudo and PAM authentication (x86_64)

It looks as though sudo might be compiling without PAM support for 64-bit systems. This code in the SlackBuild:

Code:
# Choose correct options depending on whether PAM is installed:
if [ -L /lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}/libpam.so.? ]; then
  PAM_OPTIONS="--enable-pam-session --with-pam=yes"
  unset SHADOW_OPTIONS
else
  unset PAM_OPTIONS
  SHADOW_OPTIONS="--disable-pam-session --with-pam=no"
fi
looks for /lib/libpam.so.? on x86_64 because LIBDIRSUFFIX is not set. The PAM libraries are in /lib64, so the options --disable-pam-session and --with-pam=no were passed to .configure when I did the build. Using the patch below resulted in the PAM options being passed instead.

Patch:

Code:
--- sudo.SlackBuild     2021-03-07 14:17:22.894280178 +0900
+++ sudo.SlackBuild     2021-03-07 14:35:35.479313521 +0900
@@ -54,12 +54,16 @@

 if [ "$ARCH" = "i386" ]; then
   SLKCFLAGS="-O2 -march=i386 -mcpu=i686"
+  LIBDIRSUFFIX=""
 elif [ "$ARCH" = "i586" ]; then
   SLKCFLAGS="-O2 -march=i586 -mtune=i686"
+  LIBDIRSUFFIX=""
 elif [ "$ARCH" = "s390" ]; then
   SLKCFLAGS="-O2"
+  LIBDIRSUFFIX=""
 elif [ "$ARCH" = "x86_64" ]; then
   SLKCFLAGS="-O2 -fPIC"
+  LIBDIRSUFFIX="64"
 fi

 cd $TMP
(Sorry in advance if I'm off-base about this.)
 
Old 03-07-2021, 10:22 AM   #7009
Andypoo
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2019
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 66

Rep: Reputation: 57
Just leaving this here..

efivar-20191015_ca85d51-x86_64-3 still contains the regression that prevents installation on eMMC. Please run fetch-efivar.sh to pull a new version.

Details:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post6127519

Thanks!

Last edited by Andypoo; 03-07-2021 at 10:23 AM.
 
Old 03-07-2021, 12:04 PM   #7010
richarson
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2020
Location: Argentina
Distribution: Fedora 38 KDE
Posts: 112

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisretusn View Post
If you decide to start using -current then you should know you will have to change it. My guess for the reason, is 14.2 is the stable release version thus mirror points to 14.2 because that is the default for the stable release version of Slackware. As it sits right now, if you have slackware-14.2 installed you will hose your system up since the "default" is set to slackware64=14.2 unless you change the mirror.
But if you're already running -current why would mirrors file revert to 14.2? I think that was the question.
For 14.2 of course mirrors should point to a 14.2 mirror by default (if at all, se below).

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisretusn View Post
That said, I don't believe there should be a default mirror set in /etc/slackpkg/mirrors. I think /etc/slackpkg/mirrors should not have a default at all. Let the use pick a mirror as it was in the past.

My
I respectfully disagree, especially since "MIRRORS.SLACKWARE.COM [...] FINDS A NEARBY MIRROR" which seems like a nice thing to do by default.
It'd be different if it pointed to say, a US mirror.

But of course that's just IMHO.

Cheers!

Last edited by richarson; 03-07-2021 at 12:07 PM. Reason: Remove an extra word in mirrors quote
 
Old 03-07-2021, 01:08 PM   #7011
USUARIONUEVO
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,335

Rep: Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930Reputation: 930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andypoo View Post
Just leaving this here..

efivar-20191015_ca85d51-x86_64-3 still contains the regression that prevents installation on eMMC. Please run fetch-efivar.sh to pull a new version.

Details:
https://www.linuxquestions.org/quest...ml#post6127519

Thanks!
I intersting on this fix , cause some portable devices have a emmc drive.
 
Old 03-07-2021, 01:25 PM   #7012
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,505

Rep: Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320
Quote:
Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO View Post
I intersting on this fix , cause some portable devices have a emmc drive.
Let me fix for you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by USUARIONUEVO View Post
I'm interested on this fix , because tons of portable devices have an eMMC drive.
And not only. All those Chinese mini-PCs or development boards sporting an x86 CPU, also they have as main storage an eMMC chip.

Let's hope that the eMMC support would not be the next "missing feature" like was on Slackware 14.2 the support for NVMe drives...

Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 03-07-2021 at 01:35 PM.
 
Old 03-07-2021, 01:53 PM   #7013
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,058

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
All those Chinese mini-PCs or development boards sporting an x86 CPU, also they have as main storage an eMMC chip.
Which is just an SD card soldered to the main board, so when it will die the mini PC will be dead as well. Indeed that minimize the costs for the manufacturer. Thanks, but no, thanks, I prefer an SSD. No worry, they are ready to sell you an external SSD in addition...

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 03-07-2021 at 01:56 PM.
 
Old 03-07-2021, 02:15 PM   #7014
LuckyCyborg
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,505

Rep: Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320Reputation: 3320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier View Post
Which is just an SD card soldered to the main board, so when it will die the mini PC will be dead as well. Indeed that minimize the costs for the manufacturer. Thanks, but no, thanks, I prefer an SSD. No worry, they are ready to sell you an external SSD in addition...
Excuse me, but I do not understand well your point.

You requested to NOT support the eMMC drives because they are of lesser quality compared with SSDs, and Slackware will kill them?

Please note that I do not talked about the eMMCs qualities and performances, BUT rather about they being supported by Slackware as main system drive.

IF you have some particular information that Slackware -current is an eMMC killer, please be kind to disclose it because this is a really huge issue!

If you do this, you will save many people computers, as they can chose to install something else which does not broke their devices.

For example Ubuntu or even Windows 10 - I heard many people that they works well on their eMMC based devices for really long time.

Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 03-07-2021 at 06:32 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-07-2021, 03:11 PM   #7015
mats_b_tegner
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 946

Rep: Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649Reputation: 649
Mutt 2.0.6 was released on March 6, 2021. This is a bug-fix release, with some cleanup and small fixes.
ftp://ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/mutt-2.0.6.tar.gz
 
Old 03-07-2021, 04:13 PM   #7016
Didier Spaier
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slint64-15.0
Posts: 11,058

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyCyborg View Post
You requested to NOT support the eMMC drives because they are of lesser quality compared with SSDs, and Slackware will kill them?
Not at all. They are supported in Slint, and given a fitting file system in 'auto' mode:
Code:
choosefilesystems() {
    echo "filesystems" >>$INSTALL/log
    DRIVENAME=$(cat $INSTALL/drivename)
    echo ext4 > $INSTALL/fstype
    if printf "$DRIVENAME"|grep -q mmc; then
        echo f2fs > $INSTALL/fstype
    fi
    FSTYPE=$(cat $INSTALL/fstype)
}
I was just expressing a personal choice, sorry for the off topic

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 03-07-2021 at 04:19 PM.
 
Old 03-07-2021, 10:18 PM   #7017
metalforever
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 3
I'm sorry, I really cant figure out this issue and I need help.

1. vanilla full install of the 15.0 alpha w/ newest nvidia driver for 2070 super and KDE

Every time i exit X, such as to restart the computer or to control-alt-backspace into the terminal I get a black screen and the monitor says no signal (kde works fine) and I have to hard reset my computer because its still running.
 
Old 03-08-2021, 02:10 AM   #7018
elcore
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2014
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,753

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalforever View Post
I'm sorry, I really cant figure out this issue and I need help.

1. vanilla full install of the 15.0 alpha w/ newest nvidia driver for 2070 super and KDE

Every time i exit X, such as to restart the computer or to control-alt-backspace into the terminal I get a black screen and the monitor says no signal (kde works fine) and I have to hard reset my computer because its still running.
Same problem here, with drivers version 340.x it was possible to switch to another (vesafb?) driver and back, while there was only a warning in the log.
Drivers above 390.x do not support this at all, no warning and no signal. I think starting the kernel with 'nomodeset' is now a requirement for some cards.
Anyway this problem is specific to binary driver, nouveau which is the default driver in Slackware does not yet have such limitations.
 
Old 03-08-2021, 04:55 AM   #7019
Petri Kaukasoina
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,791

Rep: Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470Reputation: 1470
sysklogd v2.2.2
 
Old 03-08-2021, 07:34 AM   #7020
metalforever
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 27

Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by elcore View Post
Same problem here, with drivers version 340.x it was possible to switch to another (vesafb?) driver and back, while there was only a warning in the log.
Drivers above 390.x do not support this at all, no warning and no signal. I think starting the kernel with 'nomodeset' is now a requirement for some cards.
Anyway this problem is specific to binary driver, nouveau which is the default driver in Slackware does not yet have such limitations.
How did you fix it? I can't run the open source drivers for this card.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Requests for -current (20151216) rworkman Slackware 3441 12-28-2017 03:50 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration