SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
How does the relationship of release of Slackware relate to hardware capability of a PC?
What I mean to ask is, in general, I presume a 10 year old PC is likely to have difficulty running 13.37 and might be better off with an earlier release or am I wrong?
My current PC is 5 years old and has an AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 3800 processor and 2MB of RAM. It manages fine with Slackware 64 13.0. I have installed 13.37 on another partition but not decided whether to move to it or not. One thing I was wondering was - is 13.37 more demanding of resources for my ageing PC or could it be on the contrary - the newer kernel is actually more efficient and and less demanding of resources?
How does the relationship of release of Slackware relate to hardware capability of a PC?
What I mean to ask is, in general, I presume a 10 year old PC is likely to have difficulty running 13.37 and might be better off with an earlier release or am I wrong?
Slackware 13.37 runs very well on old hardware and new hardware. I'm running 13.37 on a PIII 866 MHz IBM with 320 MB RAM, an IBM Celeron 850 MHz with 768 MB RAM, and a Dell 2.80 GHz Intel Dual Core unit with 2 GB RAM. I'm running Slackware-current on my other Intel dual core box.
It is in most cases not the kernel that slows a machine down, but the applications and the desktop environment you are using. A 10 year old PC should run fine with 13.37, if you use Fluxbox and lightweight applications. You don't want to run KDE 4 on such a machine, since it is really a resource hog.
I am currently trying to install Linux to an iMac G3 400MHz with 512MB RAM, and I would be glad if there would be a recent release of Slackware for PowerPC. Sadly, it isn't, so I think I will go for Frugalware.
So short answer: Have a look that you don't run resource hogs and you will be fine with 13.37 and an old computer.
A 10 year old PC should run fine with 13.37, if you use Fluxbox and lightweight applications. You don't want to run KDE 4 on such a machine, since it is really a resource hog.
My older units run XFce just fine, but, Flux would indeed be faster on older hardware.
Slack64 13.37 + enlightenment (E17) seems to be faster for me than 13.1. This is on a five year old laptop - Core 2 Duo T7200, 4 GB RAM, 100 GB HDD, NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS w/ 512 MB RAM, blah, blah, blah.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.