LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2022, 04:09 PM   #31
volkerdi
Slackware Maintainer
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Minnesota
Distribution: Slackware! :-)
Posts: 2,524

Rep: Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493Reputation: 8493

Quote:
Originally Posted by yanyan View Post
Bumping this thread in case somebody might have some new insight into this.

For the past 7 months i've just been putting up with what appears to be really poor disk throughput on my new Slackware 15.0 install. My primary hard drive is mainly affected by this. External USB hard drives appear to have better performance. And just today, i decided to watch a DVD using an external DVD-ROM drive. The drive throughput according to gkrellm maxes out at 1 MB/s, my DVDs are unwatchable. The video player i'm using is xine. CPU usage is low.
Since you'd previously been running 11.0, I'm going to assume that your installation is 32-bit.

Try this:

Code:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/highmem_is_dirtyable
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-15-2022, 04:10 PM   #32
twy
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 99

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by yanyan View Post
Bumping this thread in case somebody might have some new insight into this.

For the past 7 months i've just been putting up with what appears to be really poor disk throughput on my new Slackware 15.0 install. My primary hard drive is mainly affected by this. External USB hard drives appear to have better performance. And just today, i decided to watch a DVD using an external DVD-ROM drive. The drive throughput according to gkrellm maxes out at 1 MB/s, my DVDs are unwatchable. The video player i'm using is xine. CPU usage is low.

I don't know what else i could possibly check. I've compiled and recompiled the kernel. The cpufreq governor is set to "conservative", but even "performance" does nothing, only makes the CPU run hotter.

I'm thinking of downgrading the kernel to the version that i used the longest on this machine, 2.6.31. Will this work on such a new distribution?
When I upgraded to slackware64-15.0, which uses linux kernel 5.15.x, I also experienced really poor disk throughput on my disks. I'm not sure if it matters, but my disks are configured as:
gpt (partitions for small boot disk + large root disk on 8x1TB HDDs)
raid1+raid6 (8-member raid1 for unencrypted boot, 8-member raid6 for encrypted main system/root disk)
luks (encryption layer on raid6 disk)
lvm (logical volumes on raid6\luks disk, in which actual root and swap disks are made)
ext4 (filesystem used on raid1 boot disk and root LV disk; I also have a 32+GB swap LV but with 32GB ram it is not used much)

To fix my problem, I have been running linux kernel 5.10.x on slackware64-15.0. For some reason, 5.10.x is not slow like 5.15.x. Also, 5.10.x has long term support until Dec 2026, while 5.15.x support ends Oct 2023. Try using 5.10.x. I compile a custom kernel based on the slackware .config for generic 5.15.x, then "trimmed" of at least many driver/modules I know I do not need. I compile in most of the drivers that I need, especially modules for hard disk controller and network card. ALSA audio is modular, and my sensors module is modular because I load it with kernel parameter in /etc/modprobe.d/.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-15-2022, 04:39 PM   #33
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by scuzzy_dog View Post
I'm running kernel 4.14.295 currently on Slack15. I have better results with vmware with that than 5.x.x kernels. And in general.

It's a Long Term Support until January 2024.

Compiled from source.
Interesting performance info on 4.14 vs 5.15, scuzzy_dog.

Are you running a 32-bit or a 64-bit System ?

In addition, 4.14 EoL is in Jan 2024 which is a little later than the 5.15 EoL at Oct 2023

I wonder if the same performance difference is true for 4.19 on 32-bit ?

It will be around until Dec 2024 ...

-- kjh

p.s. I took too long googling 32-bit performance and ext4 and 5.15. In the meantime, volkerdi and twy posted some interesting suggestions.

p.p.s. I did find this: Ext4 filesystem performance tuning which also pointed at this: Ext4 Filesystem but I am not sure if you're running ext2,ext3,ext4 ...

Last edited by kjhambrick; 12-15-2022 at 04:51 PM. Reason: too slow
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-15-2022, 08:16 PM   #34
the3dfxdude
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 735

Rep: Reputation: 362Reputation: 362Reputation: 362Reputation: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by yanyan View Post
Thanks for the reply.

I just checked /var/log/messages. ata1 is running at full speed of 1.5 Gbps.

Do you think this could be related to the kernel build? For example, missing a driver or a config option that ended up causing things to run at a lower speed? Recently i found out that i forgot to include the ATA SFF chipset drivers when i needed to use the built-in CD-ROM and it wouldn't work, and i saw that ATA SFF included support for ICH8 SATA. Excitedly i recompiled the kernel with the ATA SFF drivers, hoping that things would go back to normal, but nothing. Alternatively, could i have included a driver or config option that's somehow causing conflicts and causing the lower speed?

ADD: I grabbed the installers for kernel 2.6.37.6 from Slack 13.37. I'm having trouble compiling 2.6.39 on my stock gcc.


ADD: Well shit. I got the "FATAL: kernel too old" panic when i booted up 2.6.37.6.
No I don't think there would be a serious regression or missing driver in the kernel. But to take the guess work out of setting up your own config, you could take the kernel packages from each release of slackware and carefully install each version in parallel with your slackware 15 kernel and try each one to hopefully find one that "works". BTW, are you compiling your own kernels? And I'm also curious if you are running in 32-bit mode.
 
Old 12-15-2022, 09:41 PM   #35
yanyan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by keefaz View Post
could you post output with
Code:
dmesg | grep ata1

Yes.

Code:
# dmesg | grep ata1
[    0.511745] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xfeaff800 port 0xfeaff900 irq 29
[    0.824778] ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
[    0.825720] ata1.00: ATA-8: Hitachi HTS543225L9SA02, FBEAC50F, max UDMA/133
[    0.827932] ata1.00: ATA Identify Device Log not supported
[    0.827993] ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 32), AA
[    0.831244] ata1.00: ATA Identify Device Log not supported
[    0.831306] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-15-2022, 09:44 PM   #36
yanyan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by volkerdi View Post
Since you'd previously been running 11.0, I'm going to assume that your installation is 32-bit.

Try this:

Code:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/highmem_is_dirtyable

Hi Patrick! Thanks for the response!

Did this now. Going to observe the results. Hopefully this could help with improving disk reads in addition to writes.

Yup, previous 11.0 install was 32-bit. Stuck with 32-bit for 15.0


Thank you for Slackware, Pat.

Last edited by yanyan; 12-15-2022 at 10:28 PM.
 
Old 12-15-2022, 09:46 PM   #37
yanyan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by twy View Post
When I upgraded to slackware64-15.0, which uses linux kernel 5.15.x, I also experienced really poor disk throughput on my disks. I'm not sure if it matters, but my disks are configured as:
gpt (partitions for small boot disk + large root disk on 8x1TB HDDs)
raid1+raid6 (8-member raid1 for unencrypted boot, 8-member raid6 for encrypted main system/root disk)
luks (encryption layer on raid6 disk)
lvm (logical volumes on raid6\luks disk, in which actual root and swap disks are made)
ext4 (filesystem used on raid1 boot disk and root LV disk; I also have a 32+GB swap LV but with 32GB ram it is not used much)

To fix my problem, I have been running linux kernel 5.10.x on slackware64-15.0. For some reason, 5.10.x is not slow like 5.15.x. Also, 5.10.x has long term support until Dec 2026, while 5.15.x support ends Oct 2023. Try using 5.10.x. I compile a custom kernel based on the slackware .config for generic 5.15.x, then "trimmed" of at least many driver/modules I know I do not need. I compile in most of the drivers that I need, especially modules for hard disk controller and network card. ALSA audio is modular, and my sensors module is modular because I load it with kernel parameter in /etc/modprobe.d/.

Finally, somebody else with a similar problem. I'll try a 5.10.x based on your recommendation and report back, thank you.

My disk config is way simpler than yours, just 3 MBR partitions:

Code:
Device     Boot    Start       End   Sectors   Size Id Type
/dev/sda1  *          63  62508914  62508852  29.8G  7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
/dev/sda2       62508915  70332569   7823655   3.7G 82 Linux swap
/dev/sda3       70332570 488392064 418059495 199.3G 83 Linux
/dev/sda3 is ext3.

Last edited by yanyan; 12-15-2022 at 09:50 PM.
 
Old 12-15-2022, 09:54 PM   #38
yanyan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by the3dfxdude View Post
No I don't think there would be a serious regression or missing driver in the kernel. But to take the guess work out of setting up your own config, you could take the kernel packages from each release of slackware and carefully install each version in parallel with your slackware 15 kernel and try each one to hopefully find one that "works". BTW, are you compiling your own kernels? And I'm also curious if you are running in 32-bit mode.

For a few days after install, i just used the stock huge-smp kernels and modules. Performance was somewhat worse and i thought a recompile with CPU optimizations, built-in drivers rather than modules, etc., would improve performance. Given that 15.0 glibc threw a "kernel too old" panic, i suppose trying the older releases won't work?

I've been running my self-built kernels from day 1 since 1999. This 15.0 install is 32-bit.
 
Old 12-15-2022, 10:25 PM   #39
yanyan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by scuzzy_dog View Post
I'm running kernel 4.14.295 currently on Slack15. I have better results with vmware with that than 5.x.x kernels. And in general.

It's a Long Term Support until January 2024.

Compiled from source.

This is interesting, thanks. I'll try with a 5.10.x first before going down to 4.x.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-16-2022, 05:48 AM   #40
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
All --

This thread is interesting because I am running ext4 on 5.15.y and I've noticed odd, periodic pauses when running a few SlackBuilds with many files.

For example, kernel-firmware.SlackBuild and kernel-modules.SlackBuild.

I have been ignoring it, thinking I would eventually get around to tuning my System for the ext4 FileSyatems on my NVMe Drives.

This morning I gathered a concrete example showing the pauses when running the Slackware64 15.0 kernel-firmware.SlackBuild.

I don't want to pollute yanyan's Thread with a lot of semi-off-topic stuff so I could open another thread -- Linux 5.15 and ext4 Performance.

Or should I post my logs here ?

Thanks for this thread yanyan !

-- kjh

Last edited by kjhambrick; 12-16-2022 at 06:18 AM.
 
Old 12-16-2022, 07:11 AM   #41
yanyan
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 27

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjhambrick View Post
All --

This thread is interesting because I am running ext4 on 5.15.y and I've noticed odd, periodic pauses when running a few SlackBuilds with many files.

For example, kernel-firmware.SlackBuild and kernel-modules.SlackBuild.

I have been ignoring it, thinking I would eventually get around to tuning my System for the ext4 FileSyatems on my NVMe Drives.

This morning I gathered a concrete example showing the pauses when running the Slackware64 15.0 kernel-firmware.SlackBuild.

I don't want to pollute yanyan's Thread with a lot of semi-off-topic stuff so I could open another thread -- Linux 5.15 and ext4 Performance.

Or should I post my logs here ?

Thanks for this thread yanyan !

-- kjh

Go ahead and post your tests and findings here. The thread title after all is "possibly poor disk performance after Slackware 15.0 upgrade." Perhaps other people with similar problems but didn't know it would find this thread. It would be interesting to see if your problem is ext4-related; for all we know the problem is in the block layer, for example. Or AHCI. Or FS. It could be anywhere.
 
Old 12-16-2022, 07:43 AM   #42
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
Thanks yanyan.

This post may be related to yanyan's performance issue.

I've noticed odd, periodic pauses when running a few SlackBuilds with many files.

For example, kernel-firmware.SlackBuild and kernel-modules.SlackBuild exhibit odd pauses.

I have been ignoring it, thinking I would get around to tuning my System for the ext4 FileSystems my NVMe Drives.

Here is a concrete Example from this morning.

I use the official kernel-firmware.SlackBuild quite frequently to rebuild and update my kernel-firmware.

Script #1 below is a Log Wrapper for Pat's kernel-firmware.SlackBuild. It unbuffers the output and prefixes each line of output with a timestamp and writes to a log.

Note: I see very-similar delays without the log-wrapper so the delays are not related to the logging ...

Script #2 below is a gawk script to find and print the delays in the LogFile from Script #1.

This is the output from Script #2. Note the delays between the pairs of Adjacent Rows in the LogFile.

Colon-Delimited:

Col[1] is the row number in the log
Col[2] is the seconds since the epoch
Col[3] is the log line from kernel-firmware.SlackBuild

Note: I added the extra lines to show the pauses.

Code:
     1:./.do-kernel-firmware.SlackBuild startup  at Fri Dec 16 04:21:14 CST 2022
     2:1671186074: Cloning into 'linux-firmware'...

remote: Compressing objects: 100% (193/193), done.
remote: Total 15498 (delta 158), reused 122 (delta 79), pack-reused 15225
Resolving deltas: 100% (9812/9812), done. (0/9812)
Updating files: 100% (2876/2876), done. (1513/2876)

    12:1671186096: ./copy-firmware.sh /tmp/package-kernel-firmware/lib/firmware
    13:1671186099: 

  3006:1671186100: lib/firmware/iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-hr-b0-77.ucode
  3007:1671186131: lib/firmware/iwlwifi-QuZ-a0-jf-b0-48.ucode                             # 31-sec delay

  3249:1671186132: lib/firmware/mellanox/mlxsw_spectrum2-29.2010.1232.mfa2
  3250:1671186139: lib/firmware/mellanox/mlxsw_spectrum2-29.2010.1406.mfa2                #  7-sec delay

  3405:1671186140: lib/firmware/netronome/nic-sriov/nic_AMDA0097-0001_4x10_1x40.nffw
  3406:1671186180: lib/firmware/netronome/nic-sriov/nic_AMDA0097-0001_8x10.nffw           # 40-sec delay

  4378:1671186180: lib/firmware/ti-connectivity/wl1251-fw.bin
  4379:1671186187: lib/firmware/ti-connectivity/wl1251-nvs.bin                            #  7-sec delay

  4486:1671186187: usr/doc/
  4487:1671186218: WARNING:  zero length file lib/firmware/ath11k/WCN6750/hw1.0/wpss.b08  # 31-sec delay

  4490:1671186218: 
  4491:./.do-kernel-firmware.SlackBuild complete at Fri Dec 16 04:23:38 CST 2022 ... RetCode = 0
I wonder now if this could be an issue with the ext4 module in the 5.15 Kernel ?

-- kjh

Script #1 - write kernel-firmware.SlackBuild output to a log with timestamps.
Code:
#!/bin/sh

DoName="kernel-firmware.SlackBuild"
LogNam="$DoName.log"

echo "$0 startup  at `date`"                                            |tee    $LogNam

unbuffer ./$DoName 2>&1 |gawk '{ printf( "%d: %s\n", systime( ), $0 )}' |tee -a $LogNam
RetCode=$?

echo "$0 complete at `date` ... RetCode = $RetCode"                     |tee -a $LogNam
exit $RetCode
Script #2 - Find Delays .gt. 1-sec in the LogFile
Code:
gawk '
BEGIN{ 

   FS = ":"
   N = T = P = 0
   M = 1
   L = ""  
}
{ 
   N ++
   T = $1+0

   if ( T != P )
   { 
      if (( T != P+1 ) && ( L != "" ))
      { 
         printf( "%6d:%s\n",M,L )
         printf( "%6d:%s\n",N,$0 )
      }
      P = T 
   }
   M = N
   L = $0 

}' kernel-firmware.SlackBuild.log
# this is my /etc/fstab
Code:
/dev/nvme0n1p6   swap                swap        defaults,noatime                        0   0
/dev/nvme1n1p1   swap                swap        defaults,noatime                        0   0
/dev/nvme2n1p1   swap                swap        defaults,noatime                        0   0
/dev/nvme3n1p1   swap                swap        defaults,noatime                        0   0
LABEL=ROOT       /                   ext4        defaults,noatime                        1   1
LABEL=DLD        /dld                ext4        defaults,noatime                        1   2
LABEL=HOME       /home               ext4        defaults,noatime                        1   2
LABEL=OPT        /opt                ext4        defaults,noatime                        1   2
/dev/nvme0n1p2   /boot/efi           vfat        noauto                                  1   0
/dev/nvme0n1p4   /dos                ntfs3       noauto,fmask=133,dmask=022              0   0
devpts           /dev/pts            devpts      gid=5,mode=620                          0   0
proc             /proc               proc        defaults                                0   0
tmpfs            /dev/shm            tmpfs       defaults                                0   0
# Finally, my NVMe's are nowhere-near full:
Code:
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/nvme0n1p7  1.6T  191G  1.3T  14% /
/dev/nvme1n1p2  1.8T  505G  1.2T  31% /dld
/dev/nvme2n1p2  1.8T  304G  1.4T  19% /home
/dev/nvme3n1p2  1.8T  644G  1.1T  39% /opt
cgroup_root     8.4M     0  8.4M   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
devtmpfs        8.4M     0  8.4M   0% /dev
tmpfs            14G     0   14G   0% /run/user/0
tmpfs            14G  1.7M   14G   1% /run/user/1000
tmpfs            34M  2.1M   32M   7% /run
tmpfs            68G  322M   68G   1% /dev/shm

Last edited by kjhambrick; 12-16-2022 at 07:52 AM. Reason: spelling
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-16-2022, 08:57 AM   #43
the3dfxdude
Member
 
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 735

Rep: Reputation: 362Reputation: 362Reputation: 362Reputation: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjhambrick View Post
Thanks yanyan.

This post may be related to yanyan's performance issue.

I've noticed odd, periodic pauses when running a few SlackBuilds with many files.

For example, kernel-firmware.SlackBuild and kernel-modules.SlackBuild exhibit odd pauses.

I have been ignoring it, thinking I would get around to tuning my System for the ext4 FileSystems my NVMe Drives.

Here is a concrete Example from this morning.

I use the official kernel-firmware.SlackBuild quite frequently to rebuild and update my kernel-firmware.
Do you have a 32-bit kernel as well?

Funny, two days ago I was tar xvf'ing the kernel-firmare.txz from Pat that just came out and noticed a pause. But it was not a long pause. It was maybe under 5 seconds. It was not a bad kind of pause. I just figured it was the specific file. Yes when I had the other power supply in, it would pause, once or twice after a while, and got progressively worse and eventually the system would essentially grind to a halt when using the disk. With this other power supply, and neither of you seem to have a hardware issue; I think we have ruled out a hardware issue.

When I was trying to isolate the problem I had earlier this year, I booted different live cds, loading straight to ram, and then I would dd the content of the hard disk over to a usb drive that I knew had no problem, being on a different bus and power supply. I liked this method because it kept the main hard drive read only, and just reading from the drive was enough to cause resets on the SATA bus which I would notice based on the time it took to copy 500GB. So I would try different things (including kernel versions), and I did read over potential ext4 problems and switches, but none of those made a difference. I performed the same tasks trying different hardware configurations too, which, was found to be the power supply. I also rebooted and reattempted the test several times to make sure the test was telling me I found the problem or not. But by that time, the test was probably 95% reliable on finding a SATA reset on each pass.

So I don't suspect ext4 problems in this kernel. I find the ext3->ext4 upgrade interesting, but I don't see how it would trigger any issue. For me I installed ext4 on this drive for a 64-bit install of slackware 14.1 when I switched to 64-bit finally in 2017.

I might try to unzip the kernel-firmware some, but I'm afraid that the disk caching might change the result.
 
Old 12-16-2022, 09:17 AM   #44
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by the3dfxdude View Post
Do you have a 32-bit kernel as well?
<<snip>>
the3dfxdude --

No, this is Slackware64 15.0 with linux-5.15.83 compiled using Pat's 5.15.80 GENERIC .config as a starting point via make oldconfig.

The only change to my .config since Pat's 5.15.80 .config was one new Variable introduced in 5.15.81:
Code:
INET: Source port perturbation table size (as power of 2) (INET_TABLE_PERTURB_ORDER) [16] (NEW)
I took the default as recommended.

-- kjh

Last edited by kjhambrick; 12-16-2022 at 09:26 AM. Reason: clarify version for new .config Varb ; generic, not huge
 
Old 12-16-2022, 09:30 AM   #45
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
Here is an interesting Phoronix Link that I stumbled on yesterday EXT4 Has A Nice One-Line Performance Fix For Cases When Delayed Allocation Is Disabled.

It was slated for 5.20 last June but there is little context ( what file ??? maybe ./fs/ext4/inode.c ??? )

And there was no 5.20 -- we got 6.0.y instead.

Anyhow, I don't see the patch in 6.0 or 6.1 ...

-- kjh
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iSCSI write performance very poor while read performance is excellent dinominant Linux - Server 1 10-10-2012 10:51 AM
Software Raid 6 - poor read performance / fast write performance Kvothe Linux - Server 0 02-28-2011 03:11 PM
[SOLVED] Poor Performance After Upgrade to 13.0 From Radeon 9800PRO With Open Source Driver kd5zex Slackware 8 09-05-2009 08:23 PM
poor graphics performance after kernel upgrade (2.6.11.6) geomatt Slackware 6 04-06-2005 11:14 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration