SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Minislack became Zenwalk. Don't bother with it - use the Real Slackware.
Eric
That's a rather blunt way to put it, although I do agree. Still, Zenwalk's not that bad. I tried that before I tried Slackware, the XFCE version they used was quite leaky memory-wise, and their philosophy of one tool/app for one job is seriously flawed, but otherwise it was ok.
their philosophy of one tool/app for one job is seriously flawed, but otherwise it was ok.
But this philosophy only applies to the default installation - and the choices are quite good in my opinion. After installation you can get whatever you want from their repository. After all I think this approach is more useful than having 25 never used console nntp clients or all the latest crap for kde - which you all get with a default slack install. Zenwalk is quite a good alternative to slackware for the not-so-experienced user.
Btw: I never experienced any memory leaks with Zenwalk 5.0.
I tried Zenwalk 5.0 in a moment of frustration with Slackware package management, and I have to say that I was very very impressed. It is quite zippy and recognized all my hardware out of the box. I simply cannot say a bad thing about it.
I came back to Slackware pretty quickly, but I would not hesitate to recommend Zenwalk to a Linux newbie who wants some creature comforts but at the same time have the ability to learn the Slackware way of doing things. Slackware is still there under the hood, package management and all, if you are willing to learn it.
Not everyone coming from Windows can handle Slackware right off the bat, and I think Zenwalk provides a great opportunity for someone to get their feet wet in Linux, and then graduate to Slackware when they are ready for a more challenging and rewarding distro.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.