SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
So, how do I actually get rid of this widget. I can move it around, but I can't just get rid of it; and I poked around KDE's settings which I am sure I overlooked. I just want it gone!
Ah, the infamous "cashew." I'm pretty sure that you cannot remove it in KDE 4. It is one of those interesting design decisions. You can remove it in Plasma 5. The best you can do in KDE 4 is hide it in a corner, unless I'm mistaken.
Edit: I just found this after a quick search. It sounds like a hack, but maybe it will work for you.
Ah, the infamous "cashew." I'm pretty sure that you cannot remove it in KDE 4. It is one of those interesting design decisions. You can remove it in Plasma 5. The best you can do in KDE 4 is hide it in a corner, unless I'm mistaken.
Edit: I just found this after a quick search. It sounds like a hack, but maybe it will work for you.
I hate that it cannot simply be removed. In the grand scheme of things, I will probably never use KDE - over all though it is ok - even memory usage it is around 532M per htop. I actually would love to use KDE, but honestly I just do not like Akonadi, and I shudder to think just how much more resource hungry KDE Plasma 5 is. Its still a nice looking DE, but I probably can get the same amount of functionality in GNOME MATE which is much lighter.
I actually would love to use KDE, but honestly I just do not like Akonadi, and I shudder to think just how much more resource hungry KDE Plasma 5 is. Its still a nice looking DE, but I probably can get the same amount of functionality in GNOME MATE which is much lighter.
If it's any consolation, you can use the KDE and Plasma window managers with Xfce, and possibly Mate as well. That gives you the benefit of a much more configurable window manager (allowing you to fine-tune window snapping, for example), while keeping your Xfce or Mate panel.
All you have to do is to login to KDE/Plasma and configure the window manager to your liking. Then replace xfwm4 with either kwin (kde4), kwin_x11 (plasma5, xorg) or kwin_wayland (plasma5, wayland) in the file below:
Just a note, Jeebizz, KDE does not require Akonadi. Only some features do. If you don't use those features you can safely remove it from autostart, and if you later find you miss some function, it is easily put back. Gnome otoh is progressively locking in to Wayland and systemd, so if those concern you at all, beware. IIRC, Mate is based on older Gnome so may not be headed that way. You likely know more about that than I, as I don't care for Gnome at all.
Just a note, Jeebizz, KDE does not require Akonadi. Only some features do. If you don't use those features you can safely remove it from autostart, and if you later find you miss some function, it is easily put back. Gnome otoh is progressively locking in to Wayland and systemd, so if those concern you at all, beware. IIRC, Mate is based on older Gnome so may not be headed that way. You likely know more about that than I, as I don't care for Gnome at all.
yes I found that out if you see this post from another thread about KDE. I don't know anything about Wayland, as far as systemd is concerned this is what is worrying - these projects (GNOME, etc) should not be bending to the whims of systemd - as at that point how would such projects work properly in say a BSD? I do not use GNOME3 and no real interest in it as I just don't like how it looks and functions, I would rather use MATE then.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.