just upgraded slackware from kernel 2.4.22 to 2.6.6
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It even found my C-media soundcard above. I compiled alsa support into the 2.6 kernel. I ran alsaconf and I received the no isa or pci cards found. Here are my lsmod results:
amazingly theres hardly anything in there?? What should I do. I'm very happy to have slackware with the 2.6.6 kernel but without sound i'm doomed. Please help me.
This has been told sooooo many times. Anyways, if you have compiled ALSA support into the kernel, try to compile it as a module rather 'into' the kernel. This should mostly fix the problem.
Distribution: SlackWare 10.1+, FreeBSD 4.4-5.2, Amiga 1.3,2.1,3.1, Windors XP Pro (makes a fair answering machine)
Posts: 287
Rep:
Yep, you must redo the kernel from the start...
As for myself I have had ZERO luck with 2.6 level kernels. I just cannot seem to get them to work at all.
I can do 2.4.# and 2.5.# with my eyes closed..... So that ain't the issue...
Distribution: SlackWare 10.1+, FreeBSD 4.4-5.2, Amiga 1.3,2.1,3.1, Windors XP Pro (makes a fair answering machine)
Posts: 287
Rep:
Interesting....
This is the first I had seen about upgrades of anything on slack to use the 2.6.# kernels.
I had assumed since the docs stated that 9.1 was "kernel 2.6 ready" that it was updated for the kernel.
Better fine print is needed...
I would assume now that this has come to light that this may be why we see so many post in the forum about kernel 2.6.# compile and running issues.
Also noted during an investigation of this I saw that even slack current was only using kernel version 2.4.26. That would indicate to me slack is "not" 2.6.# stable nor ready. Which could explain the problems encountered using 2.6.# and the number of off slack upgrades needed.
I have seen within the forum a mention of a 2.6.# kernel by Pat out there somewhere though I have not seen the src myself...
As I have stated elsewhere in the forum "I would use kernels above 2.4.26 with slack with caution" If you desire a totally stable system and/or running a secure server you should NOT use slack-current nor kernels outside the slack levels (2.4.26).
IMO
The newer version of module-init-tools must only be required by 2.6.6, (and maybe later).
I've been running 2.6.5 for a while now and all I had to modify was my fstab, (no longer needed umask), and I'm still running version 0.9.14 of module-init-tools.
Last edited by pave_spectre; 05-31-2004 at 07:52 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.